The Validity of Receivables Transfer (Cessie) After A Bankruptcy Declaration (A Case Study of The Curator Team of PT Perinco Graha Lestari V. PT Bank DBS Indonesia)

Authors

  • Habib Akbar Universitas Andalas
  • Busyra Azheri Universitas Andalas
  • Misnar Syam Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3463

Keywords:

Bankruptcy; Cessie; Secured Creditor; Curator; Bankruptcy Estate

Abstract

This study examines the validity of debt transfer (cessie) conducted by a secured creditor after a bankruptcy declaration through the dispute involving the Curator Team of PT Perinco Graha Lestari against PT Bank DBS Indonesia and the assignee of the transferred receivables. The legal issue arises because, after the debtor is declared bankrupt, all assets of the debtor become subject to a general confiscation under the administration of the curator, while secured creditors still retain rights over the collateral attached to their receivables. This study aims to analyze the validity of cessie after a bankruptcy declaration and to examine the disparity in judicial considerations at the Commercial Court, Cassation, and Judicial Review levels. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research consisting of legislation, court decisions, and legal literature related to bankruptcy and cessie. The results show that the transfer of receivables by secured creditors after a bankruptcy declaration cannot be assessed solely under civil law provisions, but must also consider the principle of general confiscation and the curator’s authority under the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Law. The differing judicial considerations between the Commercial Court and the Supreme Court reflect variations in legal reasoning regarding the position of cessie after bankruptcy within the Indonesian bankruptcy system, which may affect legal certainty in its application.

References

Aldila, M. R. dan D. A. Pratiwi, 2025, “Kedudukan Hukum Harta Kepailitan sebagai Aset yang Disita Negara dalam Perkara Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Teknologi Sosial, Vol. 5, No. 12.

Asisah, S. N. A. et al., 2025, “Cessie, Subrogasi, dan Hawalah: Kajian Perbandingan Peralihan Hak dalam Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam,” Bustanul Fuqaha, Vol. 6, No. 2.

Balqis, A. et al., 2023, “Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan dan Hipotek kepada Debitur sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditur,” Diponegoro Private Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Dantes, K. F., 2019, “Kedudukan Harta Kekayaan Debitor yang Dibebankan Hak Tanggungan terhadap Putusan Pailit,” Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Vol. 1, No. 2.

Dirgantara, F. et al., 2025, “Peran Hukum Kepailitan dan PKPU dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Utang di Indonesia,” Lex Stricta, Vol. 4, No. 1.

Estera, F. et al., 2025, “Implikasi Hukum Wanprestasi dan Cessie,” Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 5, No. 2.

Fadhli, M., 2024, “Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis terhadap Harta Debitor Pailit,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, Vol. 4, No. 4.

Faisal, F., 2024, “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia oleh Kreditor Separatis,” Collegium Studiosum Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2.

Farhansyah, A. et al., 2024, “Validity of Surrendering Cessies Without Debtor Notification,” Sultan Jurisprudence, Vol. 4, No. 1.

Fuady, Munir. 2017. Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ginting, Elyta Ras. 2018. Hukum Kepailitan: Teori Kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, P. N. H. Simanjuntak, 2023, Hukum Lelang di Indonesia, Media Prenada, Jakarta.

Hermawan, M. B., 2025, “Pengaturan Hukum terhadap Hak Kreditur Konkuren,” IBLAM Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 3.

Hidayat, 2023, “Implikasi Hukum dari Ketidakabsahan Perjanjian Elektronik,” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, Vol. 9, No. 2.

Hutabarat, I. R. et al., 2022, “Analisis Yuridis Permohonan Pailit PT Bina Karya Sarana,” ARBITER, Vol. 4, No. 1.

Indrakusuma, J. et al., 2025, “Relevansi Insolvency Test dalam Sistem Kepailitan Indonesia,” Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, Vol. 6, No. 5.

Kharisma, A. P., 2023, “Kedudukan Hukum Kreditor Separatis,” Perspektif, Vol. 28, No. 2.

La Tenritata, A. et al., 2022, “Kepastian Hukum Terkait Pengalihan Piutang (Cessie),” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, Vol. 3, No. 2.

Pranata, I. G. F. A. et al., 2025, “Kepastian Hukum Kreditur Baru (Cessionaris),” Cendekia, Vol. 2, No. 8.

Rahmatusyam, A., N.R. Manan, M.A. Nurfaizal, A.P. Fitrianti, dan M. Najma, 2025, “Transfer Utang Sebagian (Cessie),” Iqtishad Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah & Keuangan Islam, Vol. 3, No. 1.

Saija, R., I. M. Tesalonika, dan H. Bakir, 2024, “Implikasi Ambiguitas Kreditur Separatis dan Kurator dalam Pembagian Boedel Debitor Pailit Menurut Perspektif Philosophy,” Pattimura Legal Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2.

Suherman, A. A. W., 2024, “Akibat Hukum Cessie tanpa Pemberitahuan Debitur,” UNES Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 4.

Tinambunan, E. dan J. Julyesther, 2025, “Kedudukan Hukum Cessie dalam Pengalihan Utang,” IKRA-ITH Humaniora, Vol. 9, No. 3.

Waruwu, Eliezer, 2025, “Kontradiksi Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis dengan Prinsip Paritas Creditorum dalam Pelaksanaan Kepailitan,” Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 13, No. 10.

Wulandari, V. P., 2024, “Tanggung Jawab Kreditor Baru terhadap Piutang Kreditor Lama,” Satya Dharma, Vol. 7, No. 1.

Yusvaldi, R. et al., 2023, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Debitur atas Akta Cessie,” UNES Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 4.

Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat, 2024, Putusan Nomor 26/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain-lain/2024/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2025, Putusan Nomor 44 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2025, Putusan Nomor 27 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02

How to Cite

Akbar, H., Azheri, B., & Syam, M. (2026). The Validity of Receivables Transfer (Cessie) After A Bankruptcy Declaration (A Case Study of The Curator Team of PT Perinco Graha Lestari V. PT Bank DBS Indonesia). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(5), 3063–3675. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3463