The Urgency of Regulating Anti-Circumvention Rules in Indonesia and ASEAN: The Case of Alleged Circumvention of Indonesian Refined Sugar to Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3395Keywords:
International Trade Law, Anti Dumping, CircumventionAbstract
This study examines how the absence of anti‑circumvention rules in ASEAN and Indonesia weakens the effectiveness of anti‑dumping measures, as seen in the case of alleged circumvention of Indonesian refined sugar to Vietnam. The purpose of this study is to determine the implications of the absence of anti‑circumvention rules in ASEAN on the circumvention of anti-dumping measures as seen in the Indonesia–Vietnam case, and to determine the urgency of regulating anti‑circumvention rules in ASEAN in an effort to prevent the circumvention of anti‑dumping measures in Indonesia and ASEAN. The research method used is normative juridical, coupled with a case study of the alleged Indonesia–Vietnam circumvention, as well as a comparative study of various anti‑circumvention legal instruments in Vietnam, the European Union, and the United States. The results show three main implications. First, legal uncertainty over Vietnam’s unilateral measures; Second, procedural fragmentation that hinders cooperation; and third, the failure to set a binding precedent. The comparative study shows that clear regional rules (clear definitions, objective testing, structured procedural standards, exemptions for genuine operators, and strengthened rules of origin) enhance legal certainty while limiting the abuse of measures. The conclusion that can be drawn is that ASEAN needs to immediately regulate anti‑circumvention rules, along with strengthening rules on origin certification. Gradual implementation at the intra‑ASEAN level will build regional habits and common ground, protect domestic industries, and reduce legal and trade friction.
References
Alhayat, A. P. (2017). Ketidakefektifan Kebijakan Anti-Dumping Produk Impor Baja Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Awal. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 11(2), 143–168.
Alhayat, A. P., & Muslim, A. (2017). REPEALING CIRCUMVENTION AGAINST ANTI-DUMPING ACTIONS IN INDONESIA: CASE STUDY OF EXISTING CONDITION IN SELECTED STEEL SECTORS AND BENCHMARKING FROM WTO MEMBERS’ BEST PRACTICES. In Kasan, Supardjo, P. Dewi, A. Asra, A. Suryana, R. Oktaviani, V. M. Khuong, A. Schauki, A. A. Patunru, C. Intaravitak, E. Munadi, Feryanto, F. F. Hastiadi, K. Verico, M. A.P, N. Penghuy, N. B. Parwanto, R. B. Serafica, W. R. Susila, & Z. Salim (Eds.), A New Paradigm in Trade Governance to Increase Domestic Efficiency and to Strengthen Global Competitiveness (pp. 507–517). Trade Analysis and Development Agency Ministry of Trade, Republic of Indonesia.
Alhayat, A. P., Muslim, A., Sari, N. B., Wulandari, A., Simanjutak, Y. H., S.R., M. S. E., & Sukisno. (2016). Laporan Akhir Kajian Potensi Kerugian dalam Praktek Circumvention oleh Negara Mitra Dagang.
Anti-Dumping Agreement (Implementation of Article VI of the GATT)
ASEAN Secretariat. (n.d.). SUBMISSION FORM FOR CASES OF THE “MATRIX OF ACTUAL CASES” ON TRADE BARRIERS.
ASEAN Secretariat. (2015). ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025. ASEAN Secretariat.
ASEAN Secretariat. (2023). Matrix on Actual Cases on NTMs/Trade Barriers (as of 3-5 April 2023).
ASEAN Secretariat. (2025a). ASEAN Key Figures 2025.
ASEAN Secretariat. (2025b). Matrix on Actual Cases on NTMs/Trade Barriers (as of 9 – 11 October 2025).
ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement
Chairul, R. P., & Anrina, F. (2025). CIRCUMVENTION CHALLENGES IN THE WAKE OF TRUMP’S TARIFF POLICIES: INDONESIA’S STRATEGIC RESPONSES. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum , 27(3), 553–590.
Choi, C. H. (2023). IS AN ANTI-CIRCUMVENTION SYSTEM OF ANTI-DUMPING DUTY NEEDED? EVIDENCE FROM THE KOREA IMPORT CASE . AJWH, 18(277), 277–308.
Crochet, V., & Zhou, W. (2023). PREVENTING THE ANTI-CIRCUMVENTION INSTRUMENT FROM UNDERMINING DEVELOPMENT THROUGH INVESTMENT. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 72(3), 601–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589323000192
DDTC News. (2025, October 18). Indonesia Jajaki Kolaborasi dengan Pusat Bantuan Hukum WTO. https://news.ddtc.co.id/berita/nasional/1814558/indonesia-jajaki-kolaborasi-dengan-pusat-bantuan-hukum-wto
Decree No. 10/2018/ND-CP (Vietnam)
Deng, J., Li, J., Mai, J., Shi, Y., & Zhu, L. (2025). Trade circumvention in free trade areas. Journal of International Money and Finance, 150(103232).
Dewanty R.K., E. H. (2012). RULES OF ORIGIN SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PENANGANAN PRAKTIK ILLEGAL TRANSHIPMENT. Yuridika, 27(2), 157–171.
Enforcement and Compliance, I. T. A. D. of Commerce. (2023). Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Scope Determination and Final Affirmative Determinations of Circumvention With Respect to Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. In Federal Register (Vol. 88, Number 162, pp. 57419–57433). U.S. Government.
Enforcement and Compliance, I. T. A. D. of Commerce. (2025). Monosodium Glutamate From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention . In Federal Register (Vol. 90, Number 102, pp. 22702–22703). U.S. Government.
Gao, H., & Zhou, W. (2025). (When) Can Trade Wars Be Good? World Trade Review, 24(4), 515–519.
Government Regulation No. 34 Year 2011 concerning Antidumping Measures, Countervailing Measures, and Trade Safeguard Measures.
Hasiana, D. (2024, February). Modus Pelaku Dumping Mengemplang Tarif BMAD di Indonesia. https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/29021/modus-pelaku-dumping-mengemplang-tarif-bmad-di-indonesia/2
Islam, Md. R. (2024). Reviewing Trade Remedies and Bangladesh and Looking Beyond the LDC-Phase. Bangladesh Journal of Tariff and Trade, 6, 25–38.
Kobayashi, T. (2014). Revisiting the Role of Anti-Circumvention Provisions under the wto Agreement: Lessons for East Asia. Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134484-12340037
Komite Anti Dumping Indonesia. (2023). Laporan Evaluasi Dampak Pengenaan Bea Masuk Antidumping (BMAD): Biaxially Oriented Polyethylene Terephthalate (BOPET), Hot Rolled Coil of Other Alloy (HRC Alloy), Lysine.
La Defense. (2025, November 5). Trade Remedies in Vietnam 2026: Strategic Protection & Legal Defense for Global Businesses. https://investtovietnam.com/trade-remedies-in-vietnam-2026-strategic-protection-legal-defense-for-global-businesses/#4-Anti-circumvention-enforcement
Lu, J., & Milkov, D. (2026). Understanding China’s 2024–25 Export Frontloading from the Lens of Product-Level Export Baskets.
Medina, A. F. (2025, October 20). ASEAN Transshipment and US Tariffs – Balancing Opportunity and Risk. https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/asean-transshipment-and-us-tariffs-balancing-opportunity-and-risk/
Mirza, F. I., & Lailah, F. N. (2025). Indonesia’s International Trade Policy During The Covid-19 Pandemic: Imposition of Anti-Dumping Duties on Hot Rolled Coil Products of Other Alloys From China. Jurnal Sains Politik , 3(1), 68–92.
Ostoni, L. (2005). ANTI-DUMPING CIRCUMVENTION IN THE EU AND THE US: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR MULTILATERAL PROVISIONS UNDER THE WTO? Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 10(2), 407–438.
Perez, A. C. (2024). Interpretation or international treaties: Recommendations to legal researchers. DIXI, 26(2).
Phan, T. T. L., & Lee, J. (2025). FTAS AND FRAGMENTATION OF TRADE REMEDY RULES — LESSONS DRAWN FROM EXPERIENCES OF VIETNAM. AJWH, 20(269), 269–313.
Pistikou, V., & Ketsetsidis, A. (2023). How does the level of the anti-dumping duty affect the trade re-routing phenomenon? Intellectual Economics, 18(2), 329–359. https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-24-18-2-05
Prasetyo, A., & Wirdyaningsih. (2025). THE URGENCY OF ANTI-CIRCUMVENTION ARRANGEMENTS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH THE UNITED STATES AND ISLAMIC LAW PERSPECTIVES. Istinbáth: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam, 24(1), 31–50.
Primadista, T., & Runturambi, A. J. S. (2022). The Analysis of Trade Circumvention, Threats and Risk to the Duties and Functions of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DJBC) Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 5693–5703.
Regulation (EU) 2016/ 1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016
Secretary General, M. of T. (2025). LAPORAN RAPAT PEMBAHASAN RANCANGAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG- UNDANGAN TENTANG TINDAKAN PENGAMANAN, TINDAKAN ANTIDUMPING, DAN TINDAKAN IMBALAN.
Sok, B., & Chinket, T. (2022). IN THE ABSENCE OF GLOBAL RULE, JUSTIFICATIONS OF ANTI-CIRCUMVENTION MEASURES QUESTIONED. ITrade Bulletin, 2(2), 14–17.
Sood, M., Mahmuluddin, & Zulkarnaen. (2024). Pengaturan Antidumping Dalam Perdagangan Internasional Dalam Rangka Melindungi Produk Industri Dalam Negeri. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 9(1), 1–15.
Sriwat, J., Sarntikasem, A., & Chasombat, S. (n.d.). Navigating Through Thailand’s Framework of Trade Measures, and the Dilemma Between Facilitating Free Trade and Protecting its Domestic Industry . Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://www.nishimura.com/en/knowledge/publications/navigating-through-thailands-framework-of-trade-measures-and-the-dilemma-between-facilitating-free-trade-and-protecting-its-domestic-industry
Sud, J. D. (2016). Circumvention of Anti-Dumping Measures: Law and Practice of India. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 11(11/12), 508–514.
Sukegawa, S. (2025, June 6). Can Asean Overcome the Stigma of Being a ‘Circumvention Hub’: The Pitfalls of ‘China Plus One’ and the Test of ASEAN’s Export Reliability. https://mysinchew.sinchew.com.my/news/20250606/mysinchew/6594666
Tannenbaum, C. R., Boyle, R. J., & Tandon, V. (2025). Weekly Economic Commentary. Northern Trust.
the Panel. (1990). EEC- REGULATION ON IMPORTS OF PARTS AND COMPONENTS (L/6657- 37S/132) .
Trade Minister Regulation No. 14 of 2024 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of the Indonesian Anti-Dumping Committee.
Vermulst, E. (2015). EU Anti-Circumvention Rules: Do They Beat the Alternative? (57).
Vietnam Law on Foreign Trade Management No. 05/2017/QH14
VNS. (2026, April 3). South Africa Halts Anti-circumvention Probe into Tyre Imports from Việt Nam and ASEAN. Việt Nam News. https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/1778746/south-africa-halts-anti-circumvention-probe-into-tyre-imports-from-viet-nam-and-asean.html
Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum (M. Tajuddin, Ed.). Publika Global Media.
Woon, T. Y. (2024, July 16). Economic Letter From Asia: Trade Shifts in ASEAN. https://www.haver.com/articles/economic-letter-from-asia-trade-shifts-in-asean
Yen, MA. P. T. H., Nhung, MA. N. H., & Vy, P. T. (2025). The U.S. Tariff War under Trump 2.0 and Its Impacts on Vietnam’s Economy. ISRG Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(6), 396–409.
Yiau, C. N. (2025, August 26). Parliament approves law to close duty evasion loopholes via product rerouting. The Edge Malaysia.
Yu, Yanning. (2008). Circumvention and anti-circumvention measures : the impact on anti-dumping practice in international trade. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
ZHOU, W. (2016). Circumvention and Anti-Circumvention: Rising Protectionism in Australia. World Trade Review, 15(3), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745615000762
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fasri Dimas Kristian Pramono, Huala Adolf, Purnama Trisnamansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
