International Interim Awards Enforcement under the Indonesian Arbitration Law and UNCITRAL Model Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.536Keywords:
Arbitration, Alternative Resolution, Business Law, Economic LawAbstract
The Indonesian umbrella regulation for arbitration, Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, is silent regarding the enforcement of interim awards which creates uncertainty of law. This is in contrast to the arbitration-friendly regulations stemming from the UNCITRAL Model Law that are found in Asia’s leading arbitral seats such as Hong Kong and Singapore. Presently, there is a growing demand for seats to adopt a mechanism for enforcing interim awards in international arbitration, as the absence of such enforcement undermines the efficacy of an effective justice system in transnational trade. Therefore, an analysis is needed to review the enforcement of interim awards under the Indonesian arbitration law and how it compares to the UNCITRAL Model Law, the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance, and the Singapore International Arbitration Act. Through the research, we found that there is a discrepancy both in the existence of an enforcement mechanism for interim awards and in the consistency between the law and practice in Indonesia, Hong Kong, and Singapore. In order for Indonesia to enhance its appeal as an arbitral seat, the uncertainty regarding the enforcement of interim awards must be remedied.
References
Anindita, S., & Amalia, P. (2018). KLASIFIKASI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL MENURUT HUKUM INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM INTERNASIONAL. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 2(1), 51.
Bantekas, I. (2023). Court-Ordered Interim Measures in International Arbitration: A Comparative Approach. Journal of Law and Commerce, 41(2), 277.
BAPPENAS. (2020). Appendix of Presidential Regulation No. 18 of 2020 concerning National Medium-Term Development Plan 2020-2024 (p. I.4).
BKPM. (2022). INDONESIA INVESTMENT GUIDEBOOK. https://ppid.bkpm.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Indonesia_Investment_Guidebook.pdf
Born, G. (2009). International commercial arbitration (p. 3884). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Campbell, M. (2024). The Model Law Approach to International Commercial Arbitration (p. 4). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Castello, J. (2012). Generalizing about the Virtues of Specificity: the Surprising Evolution of the Longest Article in the UNCITRAL Model Law. World Arbitration & Mediation Review, 6(1), 7–34.
Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 05/PDT/ARB.INT/2009/PN.JKT.PST.
CVG v. CVH [2022] SGHC 249.
Dilboboev, N. (2022). Issues for Enforcement of Decisions of the International Investment Arbitration on Interim Measures. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8, 5.
Dymond, T. (2024). The Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards - Global Arbitration Review. Globalarbitrationreview.com. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/insight/know-how/challenging-and-enforcing-arbitration-awards/report/hong-kong
Entriani, A. (2017). ARBITRASE DALAM SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA. An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 3(2), 281.
GE Transportation (Shenyang) Co., Ltd v. A-Power Energy Generation Systems, Ltd., ARB No. HKIAC/A11074.
GE Transportation (Shenyang) Co Ltd v Lu Jinxian HCCT No.16 of 2012.
Harahap, P. (2019). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION DECISIONS IN INDONESIA AND SOME FOREIGN COUNTRIES. Yuridika, 34(1), 122.
Judge, Z. (2017). KEBERLAKUAN PUTUSAN PROVISI ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA (STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 062 TAHUN 2008 (ARB062/08JL). Lex Jurnalica, 14(3), 144.
MacArthur, E. (2017). REGULATORY COMPETITION and the GROWTH of INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION in SINGAPORE. Appeal Law Review, 23(165), 171.
Muhaimin. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum (p. 26). Mataram University Press.
Myburgh, A., & Paniagua, J. (2016). Does International Commercial Arbitration Promote Foreign Direct Investment? The Journal of Law and Economics, 59(3), 622.
Permana, A., & Ansari, T. (2023). PENERAPAN SECURITY FOR COSTS DALAM UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA. Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara, 13(2), 149.
Prasad, P. (2017). Arbitration in Singapore and Hong Kong. International Immersion Program Papers , 57, 2–3.
Queen Mary University of London, & White & Case LLP. (2012). 2012 International Arbitration Survey: Current and Preferred Practices in the Arbitral Process. https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2012_International_Arbitration_Survey.pdf.
Queen Mary University of London, & White & Case LLP. (2021). 2021 International Arbitration Survey: Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World. https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/LON0320037-QMUL-International-Arbitration-Survey-2021_19_WEB.pdf
Rab, A. (2022). Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration A Comparative Review of the Indian Experience (p. 23). Wolters Kluwer Law International.
Respondek, A. (2023). Asia Arbitration Guide (p. 68). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Reyes, A. (2017). The Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (p. 97). Taylor & Francis.
Reyes, A., & Gu, W. (2018). The Developing World of Arbitration A Comparative Study of Arbitration Reform in the Asia Pacific (p. 148). Oxford Hart Publishing Ltd Hart Publishing.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum (p. 12). Penerbit Universitas Indonesia .
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: suatu tinjauan singkat (p. 50). Rajagrafindo Persada.
Tempo. (2008). Astro Perkarakan Grup Lippo di Arbitrase. Tempo. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/139021/astro-perkarakan-grup-lippo-di-arbitrase
UNCITRAL. (2024). Status: UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), with amendments as adopted in 2006 | United Nations Commission On International Trade Law. Un.org. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_arbitration/status
Wagle, S. (2011). Investing across borders with heterogeneous firms: do FDI-specific regulations matter? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS5914, 20–22.
Wibowo, G. (2023). Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Asing di Indonesia, Ini Aturannya - Klinik Hukumonline. Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/eksekusi-putusan-pengadilan-asing-di-indonesia--ini-aturannya-lt4d48c7e08e001/
Yuhelson. (2018). Hukum Arbitrase (p. 24). CV Arti Bumi Intaran.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Labib Wajdi, Huala Adolf, Prita Amalia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
