Reformulating the Definition of International Arbitral Awards in Indonesia: Responding to Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/2024 and a Comparative Analysis with the Regulation of International Arbitration in Other Countries

Authors

  • Tesalonika Putri Pinuram Rambe Purba Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
  • Prita Amalia Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
  • Purnama Trisnamansyah Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2220

Keywords:

International Arbitration Awards, Foreign Arbitration Awards,, Constitutional Court Decision 100/2024,, Seat vs Venue, AAPS Law, International Arbitration, Comparative Arbitration Law.

Abstract

This article discusses the urgency of reformulating the Definition of International Arbitration Awards as a legal implication following the Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/PUU-XXII/2024 on the implementation of international arbitration awards in Indonesia. The removal of the phrase "deemed" from Article 1 number (9) of the AAPS Law marks a shift towards a more assertive territorial approach in determining the international status of an arbitration award. Although this step strengthens legal certainty, there are still serious challenges related to the unclear concept of "place of arbitration" in the AAPS Law and the absence of explicit parameters to define the elements of international arbitration. Through normative legal methods and comparative studies of arbitration practices in countries such as Singapore, Australia, England, Hong Kong, and France, this article suggests a more comprehensive reformulation of the definition of international arbitration. This reformulation needs to include clear legal boundaries, a distinction between national and international arbitration, and a more structured execution mechanism to support a modern and pro-investment arbitration system in Indonesia.

References

Adolf, H. (2015). Dasar-Dasar, Teori, Prinsip dan Filosofi Arbitrase. Keni Media.

Adolf, H. (2019). Peraturan dan Prosedur Arbitrase. Keni Media.

Born, G. B. (2020). International commercial arbitration. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

Born, G. B. (2021). International arbitration: law and practice. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

Diandra, S., & Amalia, P. (2017). Klasifikasi putusan arbitrase internasional menurut hukum Indonesia ditinjau dari hukum internasional. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 2(1), 1–20.

Kjos, H. E. (2013). Territorialized and Internationalized Arbitration Tribunals. Oxford University Press.

Lew, J. M., Mistelis, L. A., & Kroll, S. M. (2003). Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.

Moses, M. L. (2024). The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (4th, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Paulsson, J. (1981). Arbitration unbound: award detached from the law of its country of origin. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 30(2), 358–387.

Pulido, I. E. R. (2025). La deslocalización del arbitraje comercial internacional. Principios y prácticas en la aplicación de medidas cautelares. Vniversitas, 74. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj74.dica

Redfern, A., & Hunter, M. (2015). Law and Practice of International Arbitration (6th, Ed.). Oxford University Press.

Safudin, E. (2018). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Arbitrase. Intrans Publishing.

Tuegeh Longdong, T. (2021). Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing dan Permasalahannya. Karya Kita.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Purba, T. P. P. R., Amalia, P., & Trisnamansyah, P. (2025). Reformulating the Definition of International Arbitral Awards in Indonesia: Responding to Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/2024 and a Comparative Analysis with the Regulation of International Arbitration in Other Countries. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(6), 4761–4773. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2220