The Effectiveness of Legal Protection For Daily Wage Workers in The Property Sector: A Substantive Justice Perspective

Authors

  • Ahmad Yanuar Alvaro Sebelas Maret University
  • Rosita Candrakirana Sebelas Maret University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3534

Keywords:

Legal Protection; Daily Wage Workers; Property Sector; Substantive Justice; Labor Law; Wage Protection

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of legal protection for daily wage workers in the property sector from a substantive justice perspective, using PT Syailendra Adidaya Group as a case study. The study is motivated by the increasing use of daily wage workers in the property industry, which often creates vulnerabilities regarding wage protection, legal certainty, and the fulfillment of workers’ normative rights. Although Indonesian labor law provides comprehensive regulations concerning employment relationships and wage protection, practical implementation frequently reveals discrepancies between legal norms and workplace realities. The urgency of this research lies in the need to examine whether legal protection can be considered effective when formal labor standards are not fully implemented but employment relations remain stable and socially accepted. This research employed a normative legal approach supported by empirical data through statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through library research and semi-structured in-depth interviews with selected informants at PT Syailendra Adidaya Group and analyzed using a prescriptive legal method. The findings indicate that legal protection for daily wage workers has not been fully effective from a normative perspective due to the absence of written employment agreements and wage practices that do not entirely comply with statutory standards. However, the employment relationship demonstrates a form of substantive justice supported by economic considerations, business sustainability, and mutually accepted employment arrangements. The study concludes that effective labor protection should integrate legal certainty, social legitimacy, and substantive justice to ensure balanced and sustainable industrial relations in the property sector.

References

Afrita, I. (2015). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial di Indonesia. Absolute Media.

Anwar, M. (2019). Peran Serikat Pekerja Dalam Menetapkan Upah Minimum Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Upah Bagi Tenaga Kerja. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua, 6(1), 767–789. https://doi.org/10.32493/SKD.v6i1.y2019.3040

Anwar, M. (2020). Dilema PHK dan Potong Gaji Pekerja Di Tengah Covid-19. ’Adalah:, 4(1), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i1.15752

Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.7.1.20-33

De Stefano, V., & Aloisi, A. (2018). European legal framework for “digital labour platforms.” JRC Science Hub, 1–70. https://doi.org/10.2760/78590

E.H.S.K. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Upah Pekerja Pada Home Industri. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(3), 1–11.

Felicia, F., & Afdal, W. (2020). Efektivitas Layanan Terpadu Satu Atap (LTSA) Kota Batam Dalam Menekan Jumlah Pekerja Migran Indonesia Yang Illegal Di Luar Negeri. Journal Of Judicial Review, 22(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i1.826

Husni, L. (2016). Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Izzati, N. R., & Kwang, E. N. (2025). Regulating Platform Work in Indonesia: Exploring Legal Options for Workers’ Protection. J-Naker, 20(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.47198/jnaker.v20i3.622

Muin, F. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (Tinjauan Terhadap UU Nomor 39 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penempatan dan Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia). Jurnal Cita Hukum, 3(1), 11–24.

Oktafina, D., Samangun, C., & Siswani, C. B. (2025). Legal Review Analysis of the Protection of Workers’ Wage Rights in the MSME Sector in Manokwari. GOLDEN RATIO OF LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY REVIEW, 5(1), 155–167. https://goldenratio.id/index.php/grlspr

Prassl, J., & Risak, M. (2016). UBER, TASKRABBIT, & CO: PLATFORMS AS EMPLOYERS? RETHINKING THE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CROWDWORK. Oxford University Research Acrchieve, 1–30.

Radbruch, G. (1946). Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 13.

Rahman, A. H. (2021). Sistem Upah Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Konsep Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State). Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Majalengka, 3(2), 45–57.

Sadnyini, I. A., & Tobing, M. G. L. (2020). Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan Terhadap Pekerja Harian Hotel Bintang Lima Di Kabupaten Badung. Soumatera Law Review, 3(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v3i1.4340

Soekanto, S. (2008). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Universitas Indonesia.

Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris sebagai Strategi Penguatan Perspektif Kajian Ilmu Hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v4i3.116

Sunggono, B. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suteki, & T. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Syuhada, S., Tasman, A., & Hardiani, H. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Pada Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) di Kota Jambi. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 5(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v2i2.2261

Yo’el, S. M. (2018). Politik Hukum Perlindungan Upah Tenaga Kerja Pada Lingkungan Industri Di Era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. Jurnal Yustitia, 19(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.0324/yustitia.v19i1.402

Zulfikar, M. (2025). Protecting Domestic Workers: The Urgency of Legal Reform. Lex Favor Reo, 1(1), 68–82.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Ahmad Yanuar Alvaro, & Rosita Candrakirana. (2026). The Effectiveness of Legal Protection For Daily Wage Workers in The Property Sector: A Substantive Justice Perspective . Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(5), 4053–4063. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3534