Juridical Analysis of the Cooperation Agreement Between Gema Santi Hospital and Udayana University Concerning Medical Specialist Doctor Education Program at Gema Santi Regional General Hospital, Nusa Penida
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3588Keywords:
Cooperation Agreement, Legal Protection, Legal Liability,Specialist Doctor Education Program, Regional Hospital.Abstract
Health development in archipelagic regions faces a critical shortage of specialist doctors, addressed by placingSpecialist Doctor Education Program Participants at Gema Santi Hospital via a Cooperation Agreement. However, this agreement lacks clear boundaries for clinical authority and definitive legal protection. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the regulatory frameworks governing legal protection and liability forSpecialist Doctor Education Program during medical disputes related to the agreement's implementation. This investigation constitutes normative legal research, operationalized through statutory and conceptual approaches. The processing of primary and secondary legal materials was conducted qualitatively, employing descriptive, interpretive, evaluative, and argumentative analytical techniques to dissect the prevailing norms and contractual clauses. The juridical analysis reveals that legal protection forSpecialist Doctor Education Program remains critically weak because the agreement exclusively regulates administrative logistics without attaching precise Clinical Privileges for the ambiguous "Independent Senior Resident" terminology This liability construct reveals a contradiction between institutional vicarious liability and individual criminal risks Furthermore, the agreement fails to accommodate professional liability insurance and prematurely directs prospective disputes to the District Court without prior medical mediation. In conclusion, the current agreement lacks comprehensive legal protection and juridical certainty, possessing high potential to trigger criminalization and impose disproportionate financial burdens upon medical professionals. It is strongly recommended that both institutions draft an addendum mandating the issuance of Clinical Privileges, the integration of professional indemnity insurance, and alternative dispute resolution clauses.
References
Adnyana, I. G. N. A., & Sukadana, I. K. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban hukum perdata dokter terhadap kelalaian dalam pelayanan medis di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah. Kertha Semaya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(4), 812–826.
Aktariyani T. Legal protection of resident doctors in handling COVID-19 patients in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia. 2020.
Budiyono, A., & Saraswati, N. K. (2024). Malpraktik medis: Karakteristik pertanggungjawaban perdata dokter dalam perjanjian terapeutik. Penerbit Liberty.
Gunawan, I. W. E., & Budiartha, I. N. P. Pertanggungjawaban hukum rumah sakit dan dokter dalam pelaksanaan informed consent pada tindakan bedah mayor. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 14(2), 189–204. 2025.
Pradnyana, I. M. D. Efektivitas peran Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (MKDKI) dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi dokter di Provinsi Bali (Tesis, Universitas Udayana). Repository Universitas Udayana. 2024.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1959 Nomor 75.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2012 Nomor 158, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5336.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 105, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6887.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 244, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5587.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 116, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4431.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2014 tentang Tenaga Kesehatan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 198, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5607.
Saputra, R., & Hartono, B. (2023). Perlindungan hukum represif bagi tenaga medis terhadap tuduhan malpraktik kedokteran berdasarkan teori Hadjon. Jurnal Jurisprudence Kedokteran, 5(2), 112–126.
Utami, S. W. Keberadaan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (MKDKI) sebagai instrumen perlindungan hukum represif profesi dokter. Jurnal Hukum Kedokteran dan Kesehatan, 7(3), 210–225.
Widiastuti, N. M. L. (2024). Hubungan kelengkapan informed consent dengan perlindungan hukum dokter spesialis kandungan terhadap potensi gugatan pasien. Jurnal Medika Udayana,
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Putu Bramantra Tangsakha Kesuma, I Wayan Parsa, Luh Nyoman Alit Aryani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
