Ownership Patterns of Land Rights from the Perspective of Customary Law Communities in Waropen Regency Papua Province

Authors

  • Daniel Tanati Faculty of Law, Cenderawasih University, Papua, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.361

Keywords:

Ownership, Land Rights, Perspectives, Waropen Traditional Law Community

Abstract

Ownership of land rights in the Waropen customary law community is very important because the land is a legacy of their ancestors which is used to meet their daily needs. The aim of this research is to find out more about land ownership rights from the perspective of the Waropen customary law community. The approach used is empirical, which looks directly at the reality that occurs among the Waropen traditional law community regarding ownership of land rights which are considered a legacy from their ancestors and are used to meet their daily needs. Data obtained from field observations, both primary and secondary, are then analyzed systematically so that the data can be accounted for. The results of this research reveal that the Waropen Indigenous people recognize 2 (two) types of land rights, namely ownership rights and use rights. Residents of the Waropen indigenous community can have property rights in the form of individual rights, family property rights which are the same as household property rights, and clan property rights or customary rights. Property rights in the Waropen language are called Mipena (Sanggei Village) or Risanau. Mipena or risanau in the traditional concept is originally a former garden. Former garden land refers to ownership of land or an area that is owned. Meanwhile, the right to use is the right to use or collect proceeds from land controlled by the state or land owned by another person, based on a mutual agreement between the land owner and the person who will use the land. In the Waropen indigenous community, this right of use can be differentiated into several groups of users of land rights, including the right to use for fellow Waropen people, this transfer is facilitated by the Government, the right to use for pastors, evangelists, teachers, health workers who come to dedicate themselves in the Waropen area and use rights are also given to traders from Bugis, Makassar, Java and Toraja as a place to carry out business activities.

References

Arie, Rohman, 2012, Pengaruh Keputusan Investasi, Keputusan Pendanaan, Dan Kebijakan Dividen Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan, Journal Of Accounting, Vol. 1, No. 2.

Abdulsyani, 1994, Sosiologi, Skematika, Teori dan Terapan, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Boedi Harsono, 2000, Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Himpunan Peraturan-Peraturan Hukum Tanah, Pasal 1, Peraturan Mentri Negara Agraria Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 5 Tahun 1999, ayat 3, Djambatan, Jakarta.

G. Kertasapoetra, et, al., 1985, Jaminan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Bagi Keberhasilan Pendayagunaan Tanah, Bina aksara, Jakarta.

____________, 1991, Hukum Tanah Jaminan UUPA Bagi Keberhasilan Pendayagunaan Tanah, Rineka Cipta, Bandung.

Geriya, I Wayan, 1985, Pola Kehidupan petani Subak Rejasa di Tabanan, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Jakarta.

Koentjaraningrat, 1979, Kebudayaan, Mentalitas dan Pembangunan, Universitas Idnosnesia, Jakarta.

Laksanto Utomo, 2016, Hukum Adat, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok.

Maria S. W. Soemarjono, 2010, Kebijakan Pertanahan Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi, Kompas, Jakarta.

Palenewen, J. Y. (2022). Hukum Agraria Dan Pendaftaran Tanah Di Indonesia.

Palenewen, J. Y. (2024). Hak-Hak Atas Tanah Dan Kekayaan Alam.

R. Soepomo, 1996, Kedudukan Hukum Adat, Pustakarya, Jakarta.

Rusmadi Murad, 2007, Menyingkap Tabir Masalah Pertanahan, Mandar Maju, Jakarta.

Slamet Santoso, 1983, Dinamika Kelompok, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Soepomo, 1963, Hubungan Individu dan Masyarakat dalam Hukum Adat, Gita Karya, Jakarta.

Ter Haar. Het Adatrecht ran Indie in wetenschap. praktijk en onderwijs.(dalam Moh. Koesnoe).

___________, 1960, Bab-bab tentang Hukum Adat, Djambatan, Jakarta.

Tanati, D. (2023). Land Ownership Rights According to Indigenous Peoples in Kwadeware Village, Waibu District Jayapura Regency. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(1), 629-634.

Tanati, D. (2023). Membuka Jendela Nilai Dan Norma Masyarakat Adat Kabupaten Waropen.

Tanati, D., & Palenewen, J. Y. (2024). Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria Pada Masyarakat Adat Papua.

Tanati, D. (2024). Patterns Of Resolution Of Customary Rights Disputes For Traditional Law Communities In Waropen District Papua Province. Russian Law Journal, 12(1).

Tanati, D. (2023). The Faisei Saubowoa Indigenous People's Kinship System in Sangei Village Waropen Regency. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(2), 140-144.

Tanati, D. (2019). The Pattern Settlement of Adat Delict of Waropen Tribe. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 89, 14.

Tanati, D. (2019). The Forms of Custom Offense (Sanctions) of Waropen Tribe of Papua. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 83, 84.

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Daniel Tanati. (2024). Ownership Patterns of Land Rights from the Perspective of Customary Law Communities in Waropen Regency Papua Province . Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.361