Legal Protection Theory for Inclusiveness Focusing on the Fulfillment of the Right to Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3611Keywords:
Inclusive, Labor, Foundation, Law, Legal ProtectionAbstract
Learning from local cases to be adopted in a global context, especially the right to work for people with disabilities and the role of foundations in Yogyakarta as intermediaries for disabled workers' partners with companies. This study focuses on how the law provides protection for the right of inclusion to work as a fulfillment of human rights and the role of foundations in this context. This research attempts to evaluate existing laws and policies related to inclusion and provide suggestions for legal development needed in the legal protection law frame. This research is a legal research using empirical legal methodology where reliable data is collected directly from field evaluation. The main techniques for collecting data are interviews with key informants and documentary research. This research utilizes qualitative analysis, which is conducted concurrently with the data collection procedure. This study concludes that to strengthen inclusiveness in inclusive labor standards, laws and internal regulations must be made to regulate.
References
Alizah, B., & Mawar, M. (2023). Implementasi Kebijakan Unit Layanan Disabilitas bidang ketenagakerjaan di dinas tenaga kerja kabupaten tangerang. Petanda: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Humaniora, 6(1), 78–87.
Broderick, A. (2015). The long and winding road to equality and inclusion for persons with disabilities: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20151120ab
Bruyère, S. M., Switzer, E., VanLooy, S., von Schrader, S., & Barrington, L. (2016). Translating Knowledge to Practice, and the Way Forward. Disability and Employer Practices: Research Across the Disciplines, 149.
Clark, B. S., & Elliott, J. E. (2001). John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Justice. Review of Social Economy, 59(4), 467–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760127100
Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., & Sincharoen, S. (2006). Understanding affirmative action. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57(1), 585–611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190029
Dennis, R. E., & Giangreco, M. F. (1996). Creating conversation: Reflections on cultural sensitivity in family interviewing. Exceptional Children, 63(1), 103–116.
Emerson, E., Fortune, N., Llewellyn, G., & Stancliffe, R. (2021). Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study. Disability and Health Journal, 14(1), 100965.
Gregg, B. (2011). Human rights as social construction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139059626
Grześkowiak, A., Załuska, U., Kwiatkowska-Ciotucha, D., & Kozyra, C. (2021). People with disabilities in the workplace: results of a survey conducted among Polish and Finnish employers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010934
Heymann, J. (2023). Needless barriers: Despite advances, equal rights for people with disabilities still lag far behind. Global Social Policy, 23(1), 184–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181221146029
Jurado-Caraballo, M. Á., & Quintana-García, C. (2024). Disability inclusion in workplaces, firm performance, and reputation. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.08.001
Katsui, H. (2020). The global disability rights realization in Finland: Deinstitutionalization of persons with intellectual disabilities. In Disability, globalization and human rights (pp. 61–74). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351043953-6
Kervégan, J. (2016). Towards an institutional theory of rights. I That Is We, We That Is I”: Perspectives on Contemporary Hegel, 68–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322967_005
Moore, S. F. (1973). Law and social change: the semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review, 7(4), 719–746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967
Nagae, A. (2015). Disability employment and productivity. Japan Labor Review, 12(1), 56–75.
Organization, I. L. (2015). World report on child labour 2015: Paving the way to decent work for young people. International Labour Organization.
Organization, W. H. (2022). Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. World Health Organization.
Pinilla-Roncancio, M., & Rodríguez Caicedo, N. (2022). Legislation on disability and employment: to what extent are employment rights guaranteed for persons with disabilities? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095654
Posner, E. A. (2008). Human welfare, not human rights. Columbia Law Review, 1758–1801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105209
Safira, M. E. (2017). Law is a tool of social engineering dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia ditinjau dari hukum Islam dan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Kodifikasia, 11(1), 181–208.
Saragih, E. P., Darwis, R. S., & Raharjo, S. T. (2024). TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN DAN PROGRAM INKLUSIF PEGAWAI DISABILITAS DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (JPPM), 5(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v5i3.46489
Simon, C. A. (2019). Education and social justice. In A Student’s Guide to Education Studies (pp. 20–28). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297212-4
Soekanto, S. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum.
Stein, M. A. (2007). A quick overview of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its implications for Americans with disabilities. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 31(5), 679–683.
Treviño, A. J. (2017). Social Control Through Law: Roscoe Pound. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129495
Wang, C. S., Whitson, J. A., Anicich, E. M., Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). Challenge your stigma: How to reframe and revalue negative stereotypes and slurs. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416676578
Wignjosoebroto, S. (2013). Pergeseran paradigma dalam kajian-kajian sosial dan hukum. Setara press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dyah Hapsari Prananingrum, Thyrone Jehuda Mandagi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
