Juridical Construction of Data Accuracy Principles in Personal Data Protection Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Singapore

Authors

  • Seroja Rizki Amelia Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3621

Keywords:

Data Accuracy, Legal Construction, Personal Data Protection, Digital Governance, Comparative Law

Abstract

The transformation of personal information into strategic commodities within digital ecosystems has elevated data quality governance beyond mere administrative concerns to a constitutional imperative. This study examines the juridical construction of the accuracy principle within Indonesia's Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law) and contrasts this with Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (PDPA). Using normative-comparative legal research enriched with statutory, conceptual, and comparative functionalism approaches, this research evaluates whether Indonesia's regulatory framework provides sufficient operational certainty for data controllers and adequate protection for data subjects. The analysis reveals that while Article 16 of the PDP Law nominally mandates accuracy, completeness, and consistency, the provision remains declarative and lacks definitional precision, temporal updating mechanisms, and clear liability parameters. Conversely, Singapore's PDPA operationalizes accuracy through the Accuracy Obligation and Correction Obligation, enforced by an independent Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) with investigative and sanctioning powers. This study proposes a juridical reconstruction of Indonesia's accuracy principle through periodic data audits, effective correction protocols, risk-based governance calibration, and the establishment of an independent supervisory authority with quasi-judicial competencies.

 

References

APJII. (2026). Report on Indonesian internet user penetration and behavior survey 2026. Indonesian Telecommunication Network Operators Association.

Bygrave, L. A. (2002). Data protection law: Approaching its rationale, logic and limits. Kluwer Law International.

Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press.

Cohen, J. E. (2019). Turning privacy inside out. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 20(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2019-0001

De Hert, P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2016). The new general data protection regulation: A sound instrument for the digital internal market? Computer Law & Security Review, 32(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.02.006

Greenleaf, G. (2023). Global data privacy laws 2023: 145 national laws, including 15 new laws, as GDPR nears its fifth anniversary. Privacy Laws & Business International Report, 181, 10–15.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Legal protection for the Indonesian people. Build Knowledge.

Ministry of Health of Singapore. (2019)). Public report on the SingHealth data breach. Ministry of Health Singapore.

Kötz, H., & Zweigert, K. (1998). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed.). Clarendon Press.

Kuner, C. (2013). Transborder data flows and data privacy law. Oxford University Press.

Lynskey, O. (2015). The foundations of EU data protection law. Oxford University Press.

PDPC. (2019). Guide to data protection practices for ICT systems. Personal Data Protection Commission Singapore.

PDPC. (2019). Public consultation on proposed amendments to the Personal Data Protection Act. Personal Data Protection Commission Singapore.

Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal philosophy (K. Wilk, Trans.). The legal philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin (pp. 43–224). Harvard University Press.

Republic of Indonesia. (2008). Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Statute Book of the Republic of Indonesia of 2008 Number 58.

Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Statute Book of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2016 Number 59.

Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. Statute Book of the Republic of Indonesia of 2019 Number 122.

Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection. Statute Book of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2022 Number 238.

Republic of Singapore. (2012). Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (No. 26 of 2012, as amended in 2020). Government of Singapore.

Rosadi, S. (2020). Cyber law and privacy protection in Indonesia. Aditama Review.

Rubinstein, I. S. (2013). Big data: The end of privacy or a new beginning? International Data Privacy Law, 3(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipt003

Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press.

Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7

Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.

Watson, A. (1993). Legal transplants: An approach to comparative law (2nd ed.). University of Georgia Press.

Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. Atheneum.

Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Normative and empirical methods in legal research: An exploratory study in Indonesia. Public Sphere: Journal of Socio-Politics, Government and Law, 3(3), 45–58.

Wiraguna, S. A. (2025). Exploration of research methods with normative and empirical approaches in legal research in Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 22(1), 66–72.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

Amelia, S. R., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2026). Juridical Construction of Data Accuracy Principles in Personal Data Protection Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Singapore. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(5), 4308–4316. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3621