Validity of the Deed of the General Meeting of Shareholders regarding the Dismissal of Directors Without Notice and Absence

Authors

  • Nurul Izzah Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Benny Djaja Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.384

Keywords:

Validity, GMS, Board of Directors

Abstract

This article is entitled the validity of the deed of the general meeting of shareholders regarding the dismissal of directors without notice and absenteeism, legal research methods with normative research types, using the statute approach and conceptual research approaches . The secondary data sources use primary legal materials in the form of regulations that are relevant to legal issues, and secondary legal materials which are opinions and legal theories that are relevant to the legal issues in this writing. So with this analysis, it can be concluded that the validity of the deed of the general meeting of shareholders regarding the dismissal of directors without notification and absence from the agenda of the GMS meeting that is, it is invalid, because according to the Company Law the decision cannot be taken by the GMS, if the director who will be dismissed is not present because he has not been notified of the meeting regarding his dismissal. However, the GMS deed becomes valid upon the dismissal of a director who is not present at the GMS meeting, if the director has been notified regarding his dismissal at the GMS meeting and he refuses not to attend.

References

Al Ichsan, A. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Peserta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham dalam Risalah di Bawah Tangan. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 2(2), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol2.iss2.art7

Dewi, M. (2016). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (Rups) Melalui Media Elektronik. Arena Hukum, 9(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00901.7

Dianti, Y. (2017). ??No Title No Title No Title. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., April, 5–24. http://repo.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/5510/5/BAB 2.pdf

Fitri, A. I., & Mahmudah, S. (2023). Peran Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Perseroan Terbatas di Kota Semarang. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1399–1410. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3198

Islah Mumpuni, M. (2023). Ketidakpastian Pengaturan Risalah RUPS Telekonferensi Berlandaskan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Bagi Notaris. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 3(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.20885/jon.vol3.iss1.art2

Joesoef, I. E. (2022). Pembuktian Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Secara Elektronik Berdasarkan Kaedah Virlijden Dan Wilsverklaring. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An, 5(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i2.672

Kartika, E. D., & Laitupa, S. (2022). Government Responsibilities in Fulfilling Victims’ Rights During the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Phase After the Earthquake in Sulai Village, Ulumanda District, Majene Regency. Musamus Law Review, 5(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.35724/mularev.v5i1.4593

Khoirunisya, A., Studi, P., Hukum, M., Pascasarjana, S., & Bogor, U. D. (2022). ANALISIS YURIDIS KONFLIK KOMPETENSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPETENCY CONFLICT SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES FOR TERMINATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS THROUGH STATE COURTS. 42–49.

Mada, Z. Z. K. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Yang Memiliki Persentase Kepemilikan Saham Yang Seimbang Pada Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v8i1.1877

Nailul Fikriya, T. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Direksi Pada Perseroan Terbatas Milik Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 5(3), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss3.art6

Pradipto, N., Kartika, C. R., & Kusuma, A. J. (2020). Pemberhentian Terhadap Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Kepailitan Melalui Circular Resolution. 86–106.

Puspitaningrum, J. (2018). Keabsahan Dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (Rups) Perseroan Terbatas (Pt) Media …. Legal Pluralism: Journal of Law Science, 8, 152–174. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229022384.pdf

Rizkianti, S. I. S. dan W. (2020). Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Perusahaan Terbuka Dalam Masa Pandemi Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 16/POJK.04/2020. Call for Paper National Conference For Law Studies: Pembangunan Hukum Menuju Era Digital Society, 577. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/1509-5136-1-SM.pdf

Rosdiana, A. C. (2021). Peran Notaris Dan Keabsahan Akta RUPS Yang Dilaksanakan Secara Elektronik (Dilihat Dari Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 16/POJK.04/2020 Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Indonesian Notary, 3(15), 213–230.

Rukmanto, M. A. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Keabsahan Akta RUPS yang Dibuat Oleh Notatis Secara Elektronik (Cyber Notary) Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Kekuasaan, 2(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.24167/jhpk.v2i1.5096

Utista, K., Otiana, C., Pasek, I. G., & Wisanjaya, E. (2023). Keabsahan Akta Autentik Dalam Pembacaan Akta RUPS Apabila Para Pihak Tidak Mengaktifkan Kamera / Tidak Saling Melihat. 8(01), 1–12.

Yanova, M. hendri, Komarudin, P., & Hadi, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Analisis Problematika Hukum Dengan Metode Penelitian Normatif Dan Empiris. Badamai Law Journal, 8(2), 394–408.

Yuwono, M. Y. (2015). Perkembangan Kewenangan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Perseroan Terbatas Di Indonesia. Notarius, 8(2), 212.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-27

How to Cite

Izzah , N., & Djaja, B. (2024). Validity of the Deed of the General Meeting of Shareholders regarding the Dismissal of Directors Without Notice and Absence. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.384

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May-June 2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Nurul Izzah , Benny Djaja

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).