Corporate Liability for Foreign Bribery: Reformulating Indonesia’s Legal Framework in Light of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

Authors

  • Christina Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam, Indonesia
  • Emiliya Febriyani Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam, Indonesia
  • Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3857

Keywords:

Foreign Bribery, Corporate Criminal Liability, OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Legal Certainty, Legal Reformulation

Abstract

This research examines Indonesia’s legal framework governing foreign bribery and the responsibility of corporations in relation to the anti-bribery standards developed by the OECD. It seeks to formulate directions for legal reform that may strengthen Indonesia’s participation in the international economic order, enhance good governance, and facilitate compliance with the requirements associated with OECD accession. A normative legal research design was applied through statutory, conceptual, and comparative analysis. The findings reveal several shortcomings in the existing Indonesian framework, notably the absence of an autonomous offence addressing foreign bribery and the absence of a corporate liability framework based on the failure to prevent bribery. These gaps result in the suboptimal alignment of Indonesian law with OECD anti-bribery standards and create legal uncertainty for Indonesian corporations engaged in international business activities. Therefore, legal reformulation is necessary through the criminalization of foreign bribery, strengthening corporate criminal liability based on failure to prevent bribery, and establishing a corporate anti-bribery compliance mechanism while taking into account the principles and characteristics of Indonesian criminal law.

References

Abdina, M. F., Ramadani, S., & Sumarno, S. (2025). Parameter Kesalahan Korporasi dalam Tanggung Jawab Pidana atas Kejahatan Korupsi Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016. Jurnal SOMASI (Sosial Humaniora Komunikasi), 6(2), 342–352. https://jurnal.ceredindonesia.or.id/index.php/somasi/article/view/1617

Alhakim, A., Sari, R. K., Febriyani, E., Jaya, F., & Nurlaily. (2025). Corruption Risks in Smart City Initiatives in Indonesia: Analysis of Legal Framework Adequacy. Kosmik Hukum, 25(3), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i3.26238

Badan Strategi Kebijakan Luar Negeri Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2023). Aksesi Indonesia ke OECD: Reviu Strategis Geopolitik, Geoekonomi, dan Implikasinya (Vol. 2, pp. 306–312). https://e-ppid.kemlu.go.id/file-service/storage/uploads/17785822096a0302c100c2f_Review_Kebijakan_Mandiri___Aksesi_Indonesia_ke_OECD_Reviu_Strategis_Geopolitik__Geoekonomi__dan_Implikasinya.pdf

Cason, C., & Hefni, H. A. (2024). Clearing the Hurdle of Corruption: Indonesia’s Path to OECD Accession. Jambe Law Journal, 7(2), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i2.379

Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. (2025). http://legalinstruments.oecd.org

Deviyanti, N. W. S. (2025). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM KASUS KORUPSI DI BANK PEMERINTAH. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat, 14(3). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/65630

Febriyani, E., Wibowo, B. R., & Ginting, J. (2025). CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN JORDAN, AUSTRALIA, AND INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DOCTRINES AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 10(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v10i2.11527

Fernando, Z. J., & Mardin, N. (2025). The Urgency of Addressing Foreign Bribery in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem. https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/entities/publication/558d4a70-8929-4395-9409-113ee0471a13

Ginting, J., Fadjar, R. F., & Talbot, P. (2024). Extraterritorial Jurisdictions: Implementation of Provisions of Foreign Bribery in United States, United Kingdom, and Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 22(2), 241–270. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol22.2.1717

Gultom, I. S., Anggoro, T. D., Handadari, A. S. K., Wicaksono, P., & Nugraha, R. B. A. (2023). Analisis Indeks Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Inklusif Pada Kawasan Konservasi Perairan di Bagian Timur Indonesia. Suluh Pembangunan: Journal of Extension and Development, 5(1), 1–10. http://jsp.fp.unila.ac.id/index.php/jsp/article/view/165%0Ahttps://jsp.fp.unila.ac.id/index.php/jsp/article/view/165/79

Halilah, S., & Arif, F. (2021). ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM MENURUT PARA AHLI. Siyasah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 4(2), 56–65. https://ejournal.an-nadwah.ac.id/index.php/Siyasah/article/view/334%0A

Hasnda, N. A. (2024). Eksistensi Perundang-undangan Anti Korupsi Indonesia dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Korporasi Multinasional: Analisis Teori Pilihan Rasional. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v15i2.4586

Helmi, M. I. (2024). Kebijakan Formulasi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Badan Usaha Milik Negara Berdasar Keadilan Pancasila. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 12(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.12.2.166-182

Kayla, S. A. (2025). Harmonisasi Hukum Internasional dan Praktik Negara Dalam Sengketa Batas Laut : Studi Kasus Indonesia dan Malaysia. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Published by Yayasan Daarul Huda Krueng Mane, 3(2), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15716283 This

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). (2026). KPK Tekankan Pemahaman Konvensi Anti-Penyuapan OECD Bersama DPR dan K/L. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). https://www.kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/berita/kpk-tekankan-pemahaman-konvensi-anti-penyuapan-oecd-bersama-dpr-dan-kl

Korotana, S. (2024). The Corporate ‘Failure to Prevent’ Principle in the UK Bribery Act 2010: Philosophical Foundations of Economic Crime. Statute Law Review, 45(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae007

Nashruddien Ms, I. A., Mandiana, S., & Setyabudhi, J. J. (2024). Corporate Criminal Law Liability in Corruption Crimes Based on Perma RI Number 13 of 2016. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 5(7), 3402–3411. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i7.1229

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1997). OECD convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions. In OECD Legal Instruments. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2011/03/convention-on-combating-bribery-of-foreign-public-officials-in-international-business-transactions_037f7856/2bfa620e-en.pdf?

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. In OECD Legal Instruments. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0378

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026). Outlook Anti‑Korupsi dan Integritas 2026: Indonesia (pp. 1–11). https://www.oecd.org/id/publications/outlook-anti-korupsi-dan-integritas-2026_d62f7e92-id/indonesia_c45ba2ab-id.html

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi, Pub. L. 13 (2016). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/209693/perma-no-13-tahun-2016

Priady, A. E. (2026). Peran Hukum Dalam Menjamin Kepastian Transaksi Bisnis Internasional di Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Citra Multidisiplin, 4(1), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v4i1.8675

Rosalinda, E., Safitri, W. D., Zahra.D., R. A. I. M., Tina, N. A., & Rosidin, K. (2025). TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM DALAM TRANSAKSI BISNIS INTERNASIONAL PADA DINAMIKA PERDAGANGAN BEBAS. JURNAL INOVASI HUKUM, 6(1), 62–70. https://ejurnals.com/ojs/index.php/jih/article/view/904

Saputra, R., Zaid, M., Wibowo, M. K. B., Hanum, W. N., & Triasari, D. (2025). Criminal Liability for Corruption of Bribery: Problems and Legal Reform. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 6(4), 2089–2140. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i4.22251

Sauni, H., Fernando, Z. J., Putra, D. A., Virdaus, S., & Hardianto, A. (2024). Beyond Borders: Shedding Light on Foreign Bribery through an Islamic Legal Lens. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2), 649–678. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.9752 Received:

Skandiva, R., & Harefa, B. (2022). Urgensi Penerapan Foreign Bribery Dalam Konvensi Antikorupsi di Indonesia. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.826

Sudirman, L., Tan, D., Tan, W., & Situmeang, A. (2024). International Laws and The Reality: The Complexity of Corporate Law in Empowering Human Rights. In Jambura Law Review (Vol. 6, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i1.22514

Sutrisno, A. (2025). PENERAPAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA: TANTANGAN TEORITIS DAN PRAKTIS. IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i2.611

Tan, W., Wan Rosli, W. R., Amboro, Y. P., Bajury, M. S. M., & Gunawan, E. (2025). Human Rights Protection in Business Practices: Between Social Responsibility and Legal Compliance. Lex Publica: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Asosiasi Pimpinan Perguruan Tinggi Hukum Indonesia, 12(1), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.12.1.2025.293

Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pub. L. 20 (2001). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/44900/uu-no-20-tahun-2001

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pub. L. 31 (1999). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45350/uu-no-31-tahun-1999

Wibawa, D. S., & Sholikah, D. I. (2026). Integrasi Hukum Internasional ke dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Prioris, 6(1), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v6i1.645 Integrasi

Wirawan, P., & Nanda, R. (2021). Accountability of Corporate Criminal Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Legal Ethics, 2(2), 97–104. https://ojs.udb.ac.id/index.php/IJLLE/article/view/1340

Downloads

Published

2026-09-21

How to Cite

Christina, Febriyani, E., & Hutauruk, R. H. (2026). Corporate Liability for Foreign Bribery: Reformulating Indonesia’s Legal Framework in Light of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(6), 4835–4850. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3857