Remission for Corruption Convicts: Contradiction between Human Rights and Just Sentencing Objectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3880Keywords:
Remission, Corruption Convicts, Proportional Remission, Restorative Justice, Sentencing ObjectivesAbstract
The granting of remission to corruption convicts remains a contentious issue in Indonesia's criminal justice system, reflecting a fundamental tension between the protection of convicts' human rights and the pursuit of just sentencing objectives. Remission is constitutionally and statutorily recognized as a right of convicts under Law No. 22 of 2022 on Corrections, grounded in the principle of equality before the law. Conversely, corruption as an extraordinary crime inflicts systemic harm on state finances and public welfare, rendering remission for corruption offenders potentially corrosive to deterrence. This normative legal study examines this contradiction within the framework of Indonesia's new Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. This study proposes a proportional remission framework based on restorative justice, rehabilitation, proportionality, and non-discrimination. The framework emphasizes objectively verifiable criteria, restitution and recovery of state losses where legally applicable, rehabilitation and reintegration efforts, and transparency in remission decision-making. Community-based restorative programs are considered as a possible future policy instrument only where they are supported by a clear statutory and regulatory basis.
References
Afrianto, I. T., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2024). Ideal Model of Policy Providing Remissions to Corruption Prisoners in Indonesia: Comparative Study between Indonesia and the Netherlands. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(6), 3997–4007. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i06-54
Aisyah, S. S., Meliala, A. E., & Sulhin, I. (2024). Public-Private Partnership Model of Correctional Institution: A Comparison Study in Various Countries. Journal of Social & Political Sciences, 7(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.07.03.499
Al Ghiffary, M. S., Tahir, H., & Syarif, K. A. (2026). A Socio-Juridical Analysis of The Status of Corruption As An Extraordinary Crime. Journal Lex Pinisi, 1(1), 47–52.
Al Hijrin, M. S., Fiaturrahman, M. I., & M. Imam Zarkasi Asadillah. (2021). Formulasi Kebijakan Pemberian Remisi Terhadap Narapidana Ditinjau Dari Aspek Politik Hukum. Journal Kompilasi Hukum, 6(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v6i2.77
Alfarizi, R. M., Suhartini, E., & Suprijatna, D. (2024). Model Kebijakan Pemberian Remisi Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Bogor Untuk Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum. Karimah Tauhid, 3(9), 10619–10638. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i9.15259
Andini, O. G., Nilasari, & Eurian, A. A. (2023). Restorative Justice in Indonesia Corruption Crime: A Utopia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.24247
Anjani, V. R. (2022). Ratio Dicendi Supreme Court Decision Number 28 P/Hum/2021 Concerning Abolition of Justice Collaborator as a Condition of Conditional Release for Convicted Corruptors in a Justice Perspective. Journal of Correctional Issues, 5(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.52472/jci.v5i2.107
Bahar, M. G. F., Firdaus, S. P., & Fairuza, H. H. (2024). Paradigm of Recodification of Corruption in Criminal Code Against its Designation as Extraordinary Crime. Arena Hukum, 17(3), 694–713. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2024.01703.10
Beno, M. E. K. P. (2025). The Granting of Sentence Remission to Corruption Offenders in the Perspective of Human Rights. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 13(3), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v13i3.309
Enggarsasi, U., & Sa’diyah, N. K. (2025). Digital Transformation in the Correctional System Towards Effective Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 9(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v9i2.47858
Harsya, R. M. K., Arini, R. E., & Novitasari, S. A. (2026). Restorative Justice in the National Criminal Code: An Analysis of Probation and Community Service under Law No. 1 of 2023. West Science Law and Human Rights, 4(03), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v4i03.2999
Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pemberian Remisi, Asimilasi, Cuti Mengunjungi Keluarga, Pembebasan Bersyarat, Cuti Menjelang Bebas, dan Cuti Bersyarat.
Koritansky, P. K. (2012). Thomas Aquinas and the Philosophy of Punishment. Catholic University of America Press.
Kurnia, A., Saleh, Muh. A., Sihotang, M., & Hutauruk, A. (2026). Analysis of the Policy on Restrictions on Remissions for Corruption Criminal Offenders. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 7(3), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.692
Larijani, M. A., & Abedifar, A. (2025). A Reappraisal of Particular Justice: Aquinas’ Interpretation and Evaluation of Aristotelian Justice. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 19(52), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2025.68573.4163
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2021). Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 28 P/HUM/2021.
Malaysia. (1995). Prison Act 1995 (Act 537).
Malaysia. (2000). Prison Regulations 2000.
Maulana, A., Zainurohmah, & Arifin, R. (2023). Elimination of Justice Collaborator Requirements in Granting Remissions for Corruptors in Indonesia: Progress or Setback in Legal Reform? Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i3.68206
Munir, A., & Subroto, M. (2025). Model Sistem Correctional based community untuk Rehabilitasi Sosial Narapidana Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.9963/vxawt230
Nabilla, G. A., & Marshanda, D. (2025). Penerapan Restorative Justice Untuk Tindak Pidana Korupsi Didasarkan Pada Prinsip Equality Before The Law (Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 28/P/HUM/2021). Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 10(2), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v10i2.281
Netherlands. (1921). Wetboek van Strafvordering.
Netherlands. (1987). Gratiewet.
Nugraha, F., & Wijayanti, S. N. (2026). Model Remisi Ideal Sesuai dengan Prinsip Keadilan dan Transparansi. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v7i1.28517
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi Normatif dan Empiris dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
Philippines. (1930). Act No. 3815: The Revised Penal Code.
Philippines. (1933). Act No. 4103: An Act to Provide for an Indeterminate Sentence and Parole for All Persons Convicted of Certain Crimes by the Courts of the Philippine Islands; to Create a Board of Indeterminate Sentence and to Provide Funds Therefor; and for Other Purposes.
Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10592: An Act Amending Articles 29, 94, 97, 98 and 99 of Act No. 3815, as Amended, Otherwise Known as the Revised Penal Code.
Putri, N. T. A., Ratnasari, A., & Firananda, G. A. (2024). Restorative Justice and Anti-Corruption Law: Toward a Progressive Penal Policy in Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 13(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.14421/hnqvpv26
Republic of Korea. (2007). Act on the Execution of Sentences and Treatment of Inmates.
Republik Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 99 Tahun 2012 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 32 Tahun 1999 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Hak Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan.
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan.
Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Rijadi, P., Sushanty, V. R., Ngaisah, S., & Rafli, L. O. (2025). Remission Policy for Corruption Perpetrators in the Perspective of Justice. Ius Positum: Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement, 3(4), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v3i4.685
Rosalia, R., & Wagiman, W. (2024). Pemberian Remisi Bagi Koruptor di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam, 11(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v11i1.9141
Singapore. (1933). Prisons Act 1933.
Wicaksana, V. W., & Januarsyah, M. P. Z. (2025). Kebijakan Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Tentang Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam KUHP Nasional: Perspektif Tujuan Pemidanaan. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(2), 709–720.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putra Eka Candra, Heni Siswanto, Fristia Berdian Tamza, Erna Dewi, Maya Shafira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
