Notarial Gatekeeping in Sovereign Investment: Formality Requirements and the Legal Consequences of Informality in Danantara's Investment Agreements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3972Keywords:
Sovereign Wealth Fund, Danantara, Civil-Law Notary, Authentic Instrument, Gatekeeper TheoryAbstract
Sovereign wealth funds are public bodies that commit capital through private-law contracts, yet scholarship on their governance has concentrated on the institutional layer of mandates, boards, and voluntary disclosure, leaving the transactional layer, where public capital is actually committed, without doctrinal attention. This study examines that layer in the case of Danantara, Indonesia's sovereign investment body established in February 2025. Using doctrinal and functional-comparative methods, it asks how Indonesian positive law regulates the involvement of civil-law notaries in Danantara's investment agreements, which transactions require an authentic instrument as a condition of validity, and what consequences follow when agreements affecting state capital are executed as private deeds. The analysis shows that the applicable formality rules are scattered across company, investment, treasury, land, and notarial legislation and are absent from the fund's own statutes. A three-tier typology distinguishing constitutive, evidentiary-functional, and discretionary formality is developed and applied to the fund's transaction modalities. Comparative evidence from Norway, Singapore, the Netherlands, and France shows that notarial gatekeeping is system-contingent. The novelty lies in reframing the authentic instrument as transaction-level verification that complements self-reported institutional governance and in proposing a proportionate formality clause for the fund's regulations.
References
Adjie, H. (2018). Hukum notaris Indonesia: Tafsir tematik terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.
Amar, J., & Lecourt, C. (2023). Sovereign wealth fund governance: A trade-off between internal and external legitimacy. International Business Review, 32(6), 102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102193
Anggraini, F. (2024). Analisis yuridis peran notaris dalam pembuatan akta pendirian perseroan terbatas berbasis penanaman modal asing. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(2), 373–390.
Arruñada, B. (1996). The economics of notaries. European Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149080
Backer, L. C. (2013). Sovereign investing and markets-based transnational rule of law building: The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund in global markets. American University International Law Review, 29(1), 1–122.
Bahoo, S., Alon, I., & Paltrinieri, A. (2020). Sovereign wealth funds: Past, present and future. International Review of Financial Analysis, 67, 101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101418
Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Indonesian law. Oxford University Press.
Cahyani, R. N. (2026). SOE dichotomy: Reconciling public obligations and corporate governance in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore. Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review.
Carosi, M. B. (2016). Le notaire latin est-il un gatekeeper? Quelques réflexions comparatives sur le rôle du notariat. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2735516
Chijioke-Oforji, C. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of sovereign wealth fund governance and regulation through the Santiago Principles and the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds [Doctoral thesis]. University of Manchester.
Clark, G. L., Dixon, A. D., & Monk, A. H. B. (2013). Sovereign wealth funds: Legitimacy, governance, and global power. Princeton University Press.
Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. Oxford University Press.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Grosman, A., & Megginson, W. L. (2023). Cross-country variations in sovereign wealth funds' transparency. Journal of International Business Policy, 6(3), 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-022-00131-2
Deffains, B., Lotti, P., & Ferrara, G. (2026). Notaries as “public good” intermediaries: Analysis of their functions using OECD PMR and the World Bank B-Ready indicators. Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica.
Freeman, J. (2000). The private role in public governance. New York University Law Review, 75(3), 543–675.
Gelpern, A. (2011). Sovereignty, accountability, and the wealth fund governance conundrum. Asian Journal of International Law, 1(2), 289–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251310000366
Ghifari, M., et al. (2026). Reconstructing PMN accountability in Indonesian state-owned enterprise governance. Jurnal USM Law Review.
Ghouma, H. H., & Ouni, Z. (2022). The sovereign wealth funds risk premium: Evidence from the cost of debt financing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 76, 102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102255
Hamdani, A. (2003). Gatekeeper liability. Southern California Law Review, 77(1), 53–121.
Helmi, T. T., et al. (2025). Peran advokat mengawal reformasi perekonomian dalam Danantara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(5), 3826–3839. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4905
Hermawan, D. J., et al. (2026). Assessing Danantara's alignment with the Santiago Principles: Indonesia's sovereign wealth fund legal regime in comparative perspective. Unram Law Review.
Illiyyin, D. Z. (2023). Peran notaris dalam menciptakan kepastian hukum bagi investor dalam investasi asing. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 3(2), 359–376.
Kim, S. H. (2008). Gatekeepers inside out. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 21(2), 411–463.
Kraakman, R. H. (1986). Gatekeepers: The anatomy of a third-party enforcement strategy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2(1), 53–104.
Kristianto, E., et al. (2025). Kepastian hukum atas kekuatan pembuktian akta notaris yang disangkal dalam proses peradilan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora.
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Masnun, M. A., et al. (2026). Financial reconstruction of state-owned enterprises in Indonesia as special state finances: Public or private law? Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune.
Megginson, W. L., & Gao, X. (2020). The state of research on sovereign wealth funds. Global Finance Journal, 44, 100466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2019.03.003
Megginson, W. L., López, D., & Malik, A. I. (2021). The rise of state-owned investors: Sovereign wealth funds and public pension funds. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 13, 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110420-090352
Megginson, W. L., Malik, A. I., & Zhou, X. Y. (2023). Sovereign wealth funds in the post-pandemic era. Journal of International Business Policy, 6(3), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-023-00155-2
Murray, P. L., & Stürner, R. (2010). The civil law notary: Neutral lawyer for the situation. C. H. Beck.
Nurhanto, N., et al. (2026). The notary's prudential principle as a safeguard for the validity of authentic deeds. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren.
Priyono, M. Y. S., & Gunadi, A. (2025). Implikasi hukum dan politik dalam pembentukan Danantara sebagai badan pengelola investasi nasional. International Journal of Economics Development Research, 6(4).
Resti, A. D., et al. (2026). Reconstructing Indonesian state-owned enterprise governance under the welfare state paradigm: Lessons from Malaysia and Norway. Jambura Law Review.
Rivero Silva, S. (2026). The good (civil law?) notary. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies.
Rwakigumba, R., et al. (2026). Sovereign wealth fund corporate governance in Southeast Asia: An examination of Santiago Principles. Journal of Governance and Regulation.
Sarjana, I. M., et al. (2025). Separated state assets in BPI Danantara and its relevance with business judgment rules. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI-Press.
Tan, D., et al. (2023). Exploring contemporary issues and key takeaways: A comparative analysis of civil-law notary laws in Indonesia and Louisiana. Journal of Judicial Review.
Truman, E. M. (2010). Sovereign wealth funds: Threat or salvation? Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Van Loo, R. (2019). The new gatekeepers: Private firms as public enforcers. Virginia Law Review, 106(2), 467–522.
Warsito, L. (2025). Kontribusi notaris dalam mendukung investasi asing di Indonesia. Jurnal Justicia, 14(1), 94–110.
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ivan Widjaja, Budi Parmono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
