Nature of Simple Proof as a Condition for Application for Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations and Bankruptcy Against Developers (developers) of Apartments and / or Flats After Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.484Keywords:
Simple Proof, PKPU, Bankruptcy, Developer Bankruptcy, Flat Bankruptcy, SEMAAbstract
The issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 3 of 2023 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Plenary Meeting of the Supreme Court Chamber in 2023 as Guidelines for the Implementation of Duties for the Courts, raises legal problems when correlated with the provisions on the principle of simple proof as a condition for postponement of debt payment obligations and bankruptcy as stipulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Article 8 paragraph (4). This paper uses normative legal research method with statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of the research show that the SEMA in question is not a product of legislation and has implications that are not binding in general, only applies to the internal environment of the Supreme Court, but the consequences of the circular letter are guidelines for judges to be able to reject bankruptcy applications and postponement of debt payment obligations against developers (developers) of apartments, flats.
References
Devi Andani, 2021, Simple Proof Principles in Application for Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal, Vol. 28 No.3
Erma Defiana Putriyanti, and Wijayanta T, 2020, Legal Review on the Application of Legal Evidence on the Application of Simple Evidence in Insurance Insolvency Cases, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 22, No. 3
M. Hadi Shubhan, 2014, Bankruptcy Law Principles, Norms and Practices in Courts, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2007, Legal Research. Kencana Prenada Group, Jakarta
Putra, I Gusti Made Agus Mega & Griandhi, Ni Made Yuliartini, 2015, Contradiction of Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 7 of 2014 with Constitutional Court Decision Number 34/ Puu-Xi/ 2013 Regarding Judicial Review. Journal of Kertha Negara 03, No. 02
Raihan Andhika, 2023, The Position and Legal Power of the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) in Indonesian Positive Law, Journal of Legal Science Publications, Vol.1 No.4
Siti Anisah, 2008, Protection of the interests of Creditors and Debtors in Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Total Media
Soebroto, A.C. Legal Position of Regulations/Policies Under the Regulation of the Minister of National Development Planning/Head of Bappenas
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrew Ardiyanto Dachlan, Ariyanto Hermawan, Hilmy Syaiful Rachmansyah, Agus Apria Widodo, Ivan Ilham Kusuma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
