Involvement of Notaries Who Commit Unlawful Acts in Making Deeds of General Meeting of Shareholders and Its Legal Consequences (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 2826 K/Pdt/2021)

Authors

  • Dewi Wulandari Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ariawan Gunadi Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.542

Keywords:

Notary, RUPS, tort, verification.

Abstract

The RUPS is the highest forum for making company decisions for the benefit of various parties, where shareholders have the opportunity to express opinions, vote, and make decisions regarding company policies. In the GMS, a notary plays a role in making the minutes of the GMS, which records and formulates the entire course of the GMS containing all decisions taken during the meeting, including the results of voting and discussion. The minutes must be signed by the notary and the chairperson of the meeting for legal certainty. In addition, the notary is responsible for ensuring that the GMS is conducted in accordance with applicable regulations, both in terms of form and substance. The notary must verify the validity of the meeting invitation, quorum, and voting rights of the shareholders. However, notaries are often negligent in performing their duties and authorities, which can be categorized as unlawful acts. This research is intended to analyze unlawful acts committed by notaries and the legal consequences arising therein for companies through Supreme Court Decision Number 2826 K/Pdt/2021, using normative juridical methods. The results showed that the unlawful act committed by the notary through the decision was negligence in verifying the results of the GMS due to the absence of the notary in the quorum. This resulted in the actions of a person who served as Director and President Director whose appointment was invalid. This made the notary involved as a defendant in the case and subject to civil sanctions.

References

Afifah, Kunni. 2017. Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris secara Perdata Terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Volume 2 Nomor 1.

Anjangsari, Sita Sesaria. Santoso, Budi. 2024. Tinjauan Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Jurnal Notarius,Volume 17 Nomor 1.

Ariani, Nunny Nurul, dkk. 2019. Tanggung Jawab NotarisTerhadap Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas yang Tidak Memenuhi Syarat. Jurnal Nuansa Kenotariatan Volume 4 Nomor 2.

Subekti, R. (1980). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sulihandari, H., & Rafiani, N. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Profesi Notaris. Jakarta: Dunia Cerdas.

Tanaka, Yasin. Asrori, Hudi. 2017. Peran Dan Tanggungjawab Notaris Dalam Keputusan Pemegang Saham Diluar Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (Rups)

Berdasar Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Repertorium Volume 4 Nomor 1.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-21

How to Cite

Wulandari, D., & Gunadi, A. (2024). Involvement of Notaries Who Commit Unlawful Acts in Making Deeds of General Meeting of Shareholders and Its Legal Consequences (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 2826 K/Pdt/2021). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(4), 936–942. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.542