Application of the Ex Aequo Et Bono Principle to the Reconsidered Arbitration Award (Case Study of the Decision of the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) NUMBER 43032/VI/ARB-BANI/2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.581Keywords:
Award; Arbitration; Ex Aequo et Bono.Abstract
In business cooperation agreements, it is important to establish measures to prevent future conflicts. This involves adding a "Dispute Resolution" clause in the agreement, which specifies how to handle conflicts using the application of the ex aequo et bono principle, either through the courts or arbitration. The purpose of the Research is to find out the arbitrators apply the principle of ex aequo et bono in arbitration awards, and the court's authority in handling arbitration award cases that are challenged in court. This research uses an empirical juridical method, which is research that seeks to see the law work in society, By using a case approach and statutory approach which aims to study the implementation of a law or legal rule carried out in legal practice and examine references related to the issue being studied, namely the Decision of the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (Bani) NUMBER 43032/VI/ARB-BANI/2020 jo Medan District Court Decision Number 831/Pdt/G/2021/PN Mdn jo Supreme Court Decision 1371 B/Pdt.sus-Arbt/2022. The results showed that the application of the concept of ex aequo et bono can be done if the parties agree to use this principle but it is carried out carefully by the arbitrator, The authority of the court in examining arbitral awards is limited to the annulment of arbitral awards at the first and appellate levels (Supreme Court), registration of arbitral awards and requests for execution of arbitral awards, However, arbitral awards that have reached the final stage of Appeal (Supreme Court) cannot be sued to the court because it is not the authority of the court to examine the case, this is in accordance with court decision number 326/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mdn.
References
Amriani, Nurnaningsih. Prinsip Transparansi Putusan Arbitrase Studi Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi Melalui ICSID Dan Pengalaman Di Beberapa Negara. Edited by Ridwan M.Said. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2019. https://mylibrary.umy.ac.id/koleksi/view/101344/Prinsip-Transparansi-Putusan-Arbitrase.
Adolf, Huala. Dasar-Dasar, Prinsip & Filosofi Arbitrase. Edited by Darlin Darmansyah. 3rd ed. Bandung: Keni Media, 2023. https://www.kenimedia.id/product/dasar-dasar-prinsip-filosofi-arbitrase-cetakan-ke-3/.
Efendi, Jonaedi & Prasetijo Rijadi. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Jakarta: Kencana.
Jayadi, Hendri. Hukum Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dan Teknik Negosiasi. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Publika Global Media, 2023. http://repository.uki.ac.id/13176/3/Buku Ajar Hukum Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Teknik Negosiasi.
Mafaid, Ahmad, Muhammad Khailid, Deni Purnama, Evriza Noverda Nasution, Rendi Fitra Yana, Rizki Maulana, Abd. Aziz Tambunan, et al. Peradilan Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Edited by Budi Sastra Panjaitan. CV Amerta Media. Purwokerto: CV. Amerta Media, 2022. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/18974/1/Editor Buku Peradilan %26 Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.pdf.
Natamiharja, Rudi. “Sengketa Internasional” International Organization. 2nd ed. Bandar Lampung: PUSAKA MEDIA, 2022. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/48038/1/HPSI.pdf.
Pelu, IEAS, and J Tarantang. Arbitrase (Paradigma Teoritik Arbitrase Syariah Dan Perkembangannya Di Indonesia). Edited by Ahmad Dakhoir. K-Media. Yogyakarta: K-Media, 2019. http://digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/2646/1/Arbitrase_.pdf.
S. M, Soerjono Soekanto. Penelitian hukum normatif:suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 2009.
Triana, Nita. Alternative Dispute Resolution (Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Dengan Model Mediasi, Arbitrase, Negosiasi Dan Konsiliasi). Edited by Apik Anitasari Intan Saputro. Yogyakarta: Kaizen Sarana Edukasi, 2019. https://repository.uinsaizu.ac.id/6834/1/alternatif dispute resolution.
W. Roosdiono, Anangga, and Chaidir Anwar Makarim. Kompilasi Tulisan Para Arbiter, Akademisi Dan Praktisi Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Edited by Anangga W. Roosdiono and Chaidir Anwar Makarim. Jakarta: Pt Fikahati Aneska, 2021. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Kompilasi_tulisan_para_arbiter_akademisi.html?id=HeYZ0AEACAAJ&redir_esc=y.
Yuhelson, H. Hukum Arbitrase. Edited by Ramlani S Lina. Pertama. Yogyakarta: CV. Arti Bumi Intaran, 2018.
Akbar, Ricco. “Ex Aequo Et Bono Di Dalam Penerapan Lembaga Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia.” BANI Arbitration Center. Jakarta, March 1, 2019. https://baniarbitration.org/newsletter#.
David, Tan. “Analisa Yuridis Pengesampingan Prinsip-Prinsip Keadilan Dan Kepatutan Dalam Proses Pengambilan Keputusan Oleh Arbiter.” Humani 11, no. 1 (2021): 38–56.
Fitriyanti, Fadia. “Penggunaan Asas Ex Aequo Et Bono Dalam Sengketa Bisnis Pada Arbitrase Nasional Dan Arbitrase Syariah,” no. April (2017): 324503. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/home/detail_pencarian_downloadfiles/842768.
Hadylaya, Michael Herdi. “Arbitrator’s Authority to Decide Ex Aequo et Bono: A Juridical Review.” Law Review 23, no. 1 (2023): 50.
———. “Harmonizing Arbitration?: Clarity , Consistency , and Consent in the Application of Ex Aequo Et Bono” 6, no. 01 (2024): 88–101.
Heliany, Ina. “Analisis Final and Binding Putusan Arbitrase Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan.” Jurnal Yure Humano 5, no. 2 (2021): 78–91.
Karlina Watti, Paula, Royke A Tarorereh, and Rudy M.K Mamangkey. “Peranan Pengadilan Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Proses Arbitrase” XI, no. 3 (2023): 342–346. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/47404/42165.
Lazi?, Milan, Giulio Palermo, and Sr?an Dragi?evi?. “Ex Aequo et Bono in International Arbitration.” Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava 2, no. 1 (2020): 47–66.
Memi, Cut. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kompetensi Absolut Antara Arbitrase Dan Pengadilan.” Jurnal Yudisial 10, no. 2 (2017): 115.
Ratu Nisa, Madha, and Abdul Muiz Nuroni. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Di Indonesia.” Cahaya Mandalika 3, no. 2 (2023): 2121–2133. https://ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/jcm/article/view/2542.
Siregar, Donald Hamonangan. “Eksistensi Arbitrase Internasional Terhadap Sengketa Investasi Asing Di Indonesia.” Cessie?: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 2, no. 1 (2023): 1–11. https://jurnal.arkainstitute.co.id/index.php/cessie/article/view/734.
Sitti Melantik Rompegading, Andi. “Legal Analysis of Cancellation Bani Reg. No. 13/Arb/Bani-Sby/I/2015 through A Court Decision.” Himalayan Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies 4, no. 1 (2023): 73–83.
Trihatmojo, Nanda Bagus, and Adi Sulistiyono. “Prosedur Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Privat Law 7, no. 2 (2019): 241.
Umam, Khotibul, and Muhammad Guntur Hamonangan Nasution. “Pemaknaan Dan Implementasi Prinsip Ex Aequo Et Bono Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Basyarnas” 9, no. 2 (2023): 456–484.
Vero, Arivani Caniago. “Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Solusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Luar Pengadilan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 8, no. 20 (2022): 304–313.
Waruwu, Ariful Hakim, Tan Kamello, T Keizerina Devi Azwar, and Abd Harris. “Kewenangan Arbiter Dalam Memutus Sengketa Bisnis Arbitrase Secara Ex Aequo Et Bono” 2, no. 12 (2023): 986–999.
Interview with Mr. Azwir Agus as Secretary of BANI (Indonesian National Arbitration Board Medan Representative) on May 03, 2024.
Law Number 30 Year 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) Decision Number 43032/VI/ARB-BANI/2020 Jo Medan District Court Decision Number 831/Pdt.G Jo Supreme Court Decision Number 1371 B/Pdt.sus-Arbt/2022.
Medan District Court Decision Number 326/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mdn Jo Medan High Court Decision Number 624/PDT/2023/PT MDN.
https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/14981-asas-ex-aequo-et-bono-perlu-diatur-secara-tegas-di-uu-arbitrase/ Diakses Pada 18 November Pukul 22:26 Wib.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Irgi Fahreza Chandra, Syofiaty Lubis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
