Legal Regulation of Forensic Autopsies in the Criminal Investigation Process: A Study of Concepts and Legal Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.667Keywords:
Forensic Autopsies, Criminal Investigation Process, Legal ReformAbstract
In criminal justice, forensic autopsies play a critical role in determining the cause and manner of death. Current provisions are unclear, leading to inconsistencies in the criminal investigation process. This study examines weaknesses in Indonesian law, particularly the ambiguity in regulating forensic autopsies, the obligation to conduct autopsies in suspected criminal deaths, and the procedures for notifying the victim's family. This study aims to provide an interpretation of the legal regulations concerning autopsies and to formulate regulatory reforms related to the conduct of autopsies in criminal investigation processes. The results of this study indicate that in criminal investigations, autopsies are crucial for determining the cause and manner of death, as well as providing scientific evidence linking the perpetrator's actions to the victim's death. However, ambiguity in interpreting the obligation to conduct autopsies under Article 134 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) leads to inconsistencies. To address this, clear regulations are needed to define when an autopsy is considered "very necessary," providing consistent guidance to investigators. Mandatory autopsies for all unnatural deaths would ensure thorough examinations. While families must be informed, their consent is not required, and obstructing an autopsy is a criminal offence, supported by Article 222 of the Criminal Code, as amended by Article 283 of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.
References
Advenier, A. S., Guillard, N., Alvarez, J. C., Martrille, L., & Lorin de la Grandmaison, G. (2016). Undetermined manner of death: an autopsy series. Journal of forensic sciences, 61, S154-S158.
Bakhtiar, H. S. (2022). Pentingnya Bukti Forensik Pada Pembuktian Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, 3(2), 36-43.
Bakhtiar, H. S. (2023). The Role And Nature Of Evidence: Forensic Insight. Jurnal Yuridis, 10(2), 10-22.
Bakhtiar, H. S. (2024). The Evolution of Scientific Evidence Theory in Criminal Law: A Transformative Insight. Media Iuris, 7(2), 221–240.
Bakhtiar, H. S., Sofyan, A. M., Muhadar, M., & Soewondo, S. S. (2019). The essence of autopsy in the criminal investigation process. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 9-16.
Bakhtiar, S. H. (2020). Hakikat Bedah Mayat (Autopsi Forensik) dalam Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana. Disertasi. Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin.
Buja, L. M., Barth, R. F., Krueger, G. R., Brodsky, S. V., & Hunter, R. L. (2019). The importance of the autopsy in medicine: perspectives of pathology colleagues. Academic pathology, 6, 2374289519834041.
Campobasso, C. P., Laviola, D., Grattagliano, I., Strada, L., & Dell'Erba, A. S. (2015). Undetected patricide: Inaccuracy of cause of death determination without an autopsy. Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 34, 67-72.
Carpenter, B., Tait, G., Quadrelli, C., & Thompson, I. (2016). Investigating death: The emotional and cultural challenges for police. Policing and Society, 26(6), 698-712.
Cross, N. (2023). Criminal justice, actus reus and mens rea. In Forensic Psychology, Crime and Policing (pp. 108-113). Policy Press.
Freeman, M. D. (2016). Traffic Injury Investigation. In Forensic Epidemiology (pp. 287-314). Academic Press.
Hamzah, A. (2015). Delik-delik tertentu (Speciale Delicten) di dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Jauhani, M. A., Pratiwi, Y. W., & Supianto, S. (2023). Autopsi Forensik Sebagai Upaya Mencapai Kepastian Hukum Pada Kasus Kematian Tidak Wajar. WELFARE STATE Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 71-88.
Kamijantono, H., Ravena, D., & Susiarno, T. H. (2023). Forensic Autopsy Implementation in Unnatural Deaths to Achieve Material Truth. European Journal of Law and Political Science, 2(4), 11-18.
Levy, B. (2015). The need for informatics to support forensic pathology and death investigation. Journal of pathology informatics, 6(1), 32.
Levy, B. (2015). The need for informatics to support forensic pathology and death investigation. Journal of pathology informatics, 6(1), 32.
Menezes, R., & Monteiro, F. (2023). Forensic autopsy. StatPearls.
Miner, A. S., Markowitz, D. M., Peterson, B. L., & Weston, B. W. (2022). Examining the examiners: How medical death investigators describe suicidal, homicidal, and accidental death. Health communication, 37(4), 467-475.
Saffary, A., & Saberi, R. (2020). The Relativistic Theory of Coincidence between Mens Rea and Actus Reus in Islamic and English Law.
Sofian, A. (2018). Ajaran kausalitas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Stasi, A., & Stasi, A. (2021). Actus Reus and Mens Rea. General Principles of Thai Criminal Law, 25-30.
Widowati, W., Ohoiwutun, Y. T., Nugroho, F. M., Samsudi, S., & Suyudi, G. A. (2021). Peranan autopsi forensik dan korelasinya dengan kasus kematian tidak wajar. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 1-18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
