Examining the Effectiveness of Using Bankruptcy as an Ultimum Remedy in Resolving Debt and Receivable Disputes: Case Analysis of PT Jawa Barat Indah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.692Keywords:
Bankruptcy, PKPU, Debt, Last Resort, DisputeAbstract
Bankruptcy is a condition that causes a person or legal entity to become incompetent in carrying out legal actions. The Bankruptcy Law was originally created to protect creditors by providing a clear and definite mechanism for resolving unpaid debts. Debtors who have difficulty paying their maturing debts and believe that they are unable to continue payments can submit a PKPU to the Commercial Court. In bankruptcy, there are several important principles, one of which is the existence of debt. Debt is the main requirement for filing for bankruptcy, because without debt a bankruptcy case cannot be filed. Bankruptcy should belast resort, namely as the last solution or the last solution of the last in solving the problem. But in reality in the bankruptcy case of PT Jawa Barat Indah, Bankruptcy was just like premium remedy or the first resort. The author will provide a review and portrait of three important things. First, regulation of debt principles in the Bankruptcy Law; Second, bankruptcy principle as last resort; and Third, analysis of the effectiveness of the use of bankruptcy in cases of disputes over debts against the case of PT Jawa Barat Indah. The method in this article is normative juridical, Law No. 37 of 2004 became the primary legal material, library research is the technique of collecting legal materials in this article. Secondary legal material uses theory last resort as a benchmark and tertiary legal material as an elaboration of certain terms. Research results: 1) The principle of debt in UUK-PKPU has two equally strong opinions, namely the narrow angle (principal debt and interest) and the broad angle (performance obligation in civil law). 2) Bankruptcy as the last action after reorganization efforts, to prevent gaps, while filing for bankruptcy requires prior understanding regarding the implementation of agreements and the involvement of Debtors and Creditors.
References
Abidin, A. Z. (1987). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Bagian Pertama (Cet. Ke-1). Penerbit Alumni.
Anisah, L., & Suarti, E. (2022). AKIBAT HUKUM DEBITOR MELAKUKAN PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM BERDASARKAN UNDANG UNDANG NO. 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 17(1), 107–117.
Bahari, A. (2019). PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KEIMIGRASIAN [Universitas Indonesia]. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/63674071/TESIS_TINDAK_PIDANA_IMIGRASI_III20200618-86945-chc73g-libre.pdf?1592536006=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DPENERAPAN_ASAS_ULTIMUM_REMEDIUM_DALAM_TI.pdf&Expires=1687878053&Signature=CSbvGRO3
Batam, T. P. F. H. U. I. (2020). Dinamika Hukum dalam Paradigma Das Sollen dan Das Sein (M. H. David Tan, S.H., M.H., M.Kn. Nur Hadiyati, S.H., M.H. Febri Jaya, S.H. (ed.); Edisi I). Inteligensia Media. http://repository.uib.ac.id/3742/1/1. 2020 Agustus - Dinamika Hukum A Lacuna of the Indonesian.pdf
Damanik, F. M. (2010). Akibat Putusan Pemailitan Perusahaan Pengembangan Terhadap PPJB Atas SRS (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 73/Pailit/PN.NiagaJkt.Pst.) (Issue 73) [Universitas Indonesia]. https://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-9/20325746-S24951-Febryna Maringga Damanik.pdf
Dewi, W. W., & Tjatrayasa, I. M. (2017). Akibat Hukum Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Terhadap Status Sita dan Eksekusi Jaminan Ditinjau Dari Undang Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Kertha Semaya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 1–6. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/download/19129/12630
Fuady, M. (2005). Hukum Pailit Dalam Teori dan Praktek (Edisi Revisi Disesuaikan dengan UU No. 37 Tahun 2004) (Cet. Ke-3). Mandar Maju.
Gultom, R. M. dan E. R. (2023). ASPEK KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG DALAM PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI NASIONAL. UNES LAW REVIEW, 5(4), 1744–1755. https://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/491
Hartono, S. S. (1993). Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran (Cet. Ke-1). Seksi Hukum Dagang Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada.
Hengky, I., & Amboro, F. Y. P. (2022). Quo Vadis Hukum Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 6(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v6i2.6318
Hiariej, Z. A. M. dan E. O. . (2021). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum (Pertama). Red & White Publishing.
Husna, T. R. N. dan M. F. (2016). ANALISIS MODEL PENYELESAIAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANGNOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN. LP2M UMNAW, 7(1), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12561.25446
Ismail, W. R. (2018). Inkonsistensi Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Dalam Memutus Permohonan Pailit Terhadap Perusahaan Efek [Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://edoc.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/7906
Juliantini, N. N., Arjaya, I. M., & Widiati, I. A. P. (2021). Prosedur Dan Akibat Hukum Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 03/PKPU/2010/PN.Niaga.Sby). Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 3(1), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.1.2021.101-105
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek Voor Indonesie), 1 (1847). https://www.dilmil-jakarta.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Kitab-Undang-Undang-Hukum-Perdata.pdf
Koentjoroningrat. (1977). Metode-Metode Penelitan Masyarakat (Cet. Ke-1). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kusumaningrum, M. (2011). PERKEMBANGAN PENGERTIAN UTANG MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DI INDONESIA [Diponegoro]. In Diponegoro University. http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/7130/1/LUZARDO-BUIATRIA-2017.pdf
Lamintang, P. A. . (1997). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia (ed. Revisi). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
M. Yasir Said, S. H. D. I. S. H. M. H. (2019). Pidana Kehutanan Indonesia: Pergeseran Delik Kehutanan Sebagai Premium Remedium (Cet. I). Nusamedia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=AglUEAAAQBAJ
Mantili, R., & Trisna Dewi, P. E. (2021). PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) TERKAIT PENYELESAIAN UTANG PIUTANG DALAM KEPAILITAN. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v6i1.618
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi) (Cet. Ke-13). Pranadamedia Group. https://doi.org/340.072
Nurwulan, S. (2017). RENEGOSIASI DALAM BENTUK RESTRUKTURISASI UTANG DALAM HAL DEBITUR CIDERA JANJI KARENA PAILIT PADA KREDIT PEMILIKAN RUMAH (KPR) DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(1), 107–121. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/SKD/article/download/795/660
Prodjodikoro, W. (2014). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia (R. Refika (ed.); 3rd ed.). PT Refika Aditama.
RUSLI, T. (2016). ANALISI TERHADAP PENYEHATAN PERUSAHAAN MELALUI PKPU YANG BERKEADILAN. JURNAL KEADILAN PROGRESIF, 7(2), 91–104. http://jurnal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/KP/article/view/745
Shubhan, M. H. (2008). HUKUM KEPAILITAN: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan (Pertama). KENCANA Prenadamedia Group. https://doi.org/9791486085
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan (Cet. Ke-1). Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Ed. Kedua,). Kencana. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Sejarah_Asas_dan_Teori_Hukum_Kepailitan/N_q2DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Sutan+Remy+Sjahdeini,+Sejarah,+Asas,+dan+Teori+Hukum+Kepailitan+Memahami+Undang-Undang+++No.+37+Tahun+2004+Tentang+Kepailitan+dan+Penundaan+Kewajib
Sridadi, A. R. (2009). KEDUDUKAN PEMEGANG HAK JAMINAN DAN KOMPETENSI PERADILAN PAJAK DALAM PENAGIHAN PAJAK. Jurnal Media Hukum, 16(1), 161–174. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/15478
Sukanto, S. (1990). Ringkasan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Empris. Ind-Hill-Co.
Tata Wijayanta, M. B. A. . (2021). CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY, KERJA SAMA LINTAS BATAS ANTAR LEMBAGA PERADILAN: Perbandingan Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Korea Selatan (Cet. Ke-1). UGM PRESS. https://doi.org/6233590183
Tejaningsih, T. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Separatis Dalam Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit [Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/9437
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Pub. L. No. 37, Database Peraturan BPK-RI 55 (2004). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/40784
Waluyo, B. (1996). Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek (Cet. Ke-2). SINAR GRAFIKA.
Yuliastuti, D. (2022). Kaleidoskop 2022: Sejumlah BUMN Pailit dan Bubar. Fortuneidn.Com. https://www.fortuneidn.com/news/desy/kaleidoskop-2022-sejumlah-bumn-pailit-dan-bubar-sepanjang-tahun-2022?page=all
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Millatus Shohihah, Nazhif Ali Murtadho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
