Juridical Analysis of Over Credit in Motor Vehicle Credit Agreement with Fiduciary Guarantee in View of Undang-Undang Nomor 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guarantee
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.700Keywords:
Over Credit, Credit Agreement, Juridical, FiduciaryAbstract
In the world of motor vehicle credit financing as stipulated in Pasal 23 ayat 2 of Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 concerning Fiduciary which explains that a debtor is prohibited from selling transferring and or mortgaging the object of fiduciary guarantee, except with the permission of the creditor, but in reality the practice of transferring (Over Credit) or mortgaging often occurs among the public as in case study Number. 130/PID SUS/2023/PN SKB. This research examines and analyzes related to over credit that occurs without the knowledge of creditors that occurs among the community, therefore researchers raise two problem formulations among them. First, the legal consequences to the creditor arising from the decision in case No. 130/pid sus/2023/pn skb. 130/PID SUS/2023/PN SKB. Second, the legal consequences for debtors who over credit without the knowledge of the creditor. This research uses an analytical descriptive method with a normative juridical approach, in which data and information are analyzed normatively. The results showed that it is important to be careful in determining a person who can be held legally responsible, because those who can be held legally responsible are legal subjects who carry out legal relations in this study are creditors and debtors.
References
Aripin, J., & Ahmadi, F. M. (2010). Metodologi penelitian hukum (Cet. pertama). Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Fuady, M. (2003). Jaminan fidusia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Guritno, T. (1996). Kamus perbankan dan bisnis. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.
Hernoko, A. Y. (2010). Hukum perjanjian asas proposionalitas dalam kontrak komersial. Jakarta: PT Kharisma Putra Utama.
Kitab Undang-unang Hukum Perdata
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Misael & Partners. (2024). Over kredit kendaraan bermotor tanpa sepengetahuan pihak leasing. Diakses melalui http://misaelandpartners.com/over-kredit-kendaraanbermotor-tanpa-sepenget ahuan-pihak-leasing/
Muda, A. A. K. (2003). Kamus lengkap ekonomi. Jakarta: Gramedia Press.
Muljadi, K., & Widjaja, G. (2010). Perikatan yang lahir dari perjanjian. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Patrik, P., & Kashadi. (2009). Hukum jaminan. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Poerwadarminta, W. J. S. (2016). Kamus umum bahasa Indonesia (Edisi ketiga). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Prayogo, S. (2016). Penerapan batas-batas wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam perjanjian. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 3(2), 280-287.
Rachmad, S. (2020). Hukum perikatan ajaran umum perjanjian. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Rusli, N. F. (2022). Analisa hukum terhadap objek jaminan fidusia yang dialihkan oleh debitur studi kasus di PT. Pegadaian (PERSERO) Pasar Butung Makasar. Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bosowa Makasar.
Rusli, N. F. (2022). Analisis hukum terhadap objek jaminan fidusia yang dialihkan oleh debitor (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Bosowa).
Santosa, I. N., Husnullabib, R. F., Zakaria, M. B., & Sianturi, S. (2022). Analisis kasus over kredit sengketa objek jaminan fidusia (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru Nomor 853/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Pbr). Diponogoro Private Law Review.
Santoso, M. A. (2014). Hukum, moral & keadilan sebuah kajian filsafat hukum (Cet. kedua). Jakarta: Kencana.
Satrio, J. (2011). Hukum perikatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Satrio, J., & Rachmad, S. (2010). Penjelasan hukum tentang cessie. Jakarta: Nasional Legal Reform Program.
Setiono, G. C. (2018). Jaminan kebendaan dalam proses perjanjian kredit perbankan (Tinjauan yuridis terhadap jaminan benda bergerak tidak berwujud). Transparansi Hukum. https://doi.org/10.30737/transph.v1i1.159
Solihin, I., & Ahmad. (2010). Buku pintar ekonomi syariah. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia Building.
Subagiyo, D. T. (2018). Hukum jaminan dalam perspektif undang-undangan jaminan fidusia (Suatu pengantar).
Subekti. (1987). Hukum perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermassa.
Sunaryo. (2013). Hukum lembaga pembiayaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Supriadi. (2018). Etika dan tanggung jawab profesi hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Susanti, D. I. (2019). Penafsiran hukum; teori & metode. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Undang-Undang No 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia
Zafrinal, Z. (2022). Analisis yuridis terhadap jual beli mobil melalui over kredit pada PT Astra Sedaya Finance Batam (Putusan Nomor: 14/Pdt. G/2020/Pn. Btm). Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Law, Bung Hatta University, 13(1), 5-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Puspawangi Prameswari, Temmy Fitriah Alfiany
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
