Review of Child Punishment In The Juvenile Criminal Justice System (A Coparative Study Between Indonesia And The United States)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.701Keywords:
Comparative Law, Juvenile Justice System, Indonesia, United StatesAbstract
Comparative law is one of the methods for learning the law. For legal researchers, aside from looking from the historic perspective, it is also useful to compare the laws between respective countries, be it a whole legal system as in between legal traditions of civil law and common law or comparing between a micro system such as juvenile justice systems in each country for some purposes. Researchers could benefit from using comparative law to look for similarities or differences between legal systems or in the future they could use it for solution in the domestic law to be even better. In this paper, we will compare youth justice system between Indonesia and United States, specifically California State. Youth justice system in Indonesia has this unique sub-system called diversion and restorative justice. The main purpose of it is so children who conflicted with the law have chances to redeem themselves and build reconciliation with the victims and their families. There are also different rights set for the children written in the Code such as the hearing process must be enclosed, and their identity must not be exposed by the media to public eyes. In the United States, there aren’t so many differences by the book except the bargaining, but they have a special procedure before the initial hearing that is the court will consider if the child’s crime is still fit within the juvenile court jurisdiction or sending them to the criminal court which called by judicial waiver. This means that the child is stripped of their special rights and will go to adult prison if the juvenile court decided they could not handle the case for its nature of crime. When the child is proven to be guilty, they also will be sent to adult prison. Finding similarities and differences between legal systems could be useful for research but doesn’t mean that the legal system is flawed or too good. It needs to be reminded that not all the system or sub-system could be applied to other countries since there are also differences in cultures and practices especially between Western and Asian society.
References
Burrow, John. “Reverse Waiver and the Effects of Legal, Statutory, and Secondary Legal Factors on Sentencing Outcomes for Juvenile Offenders.” Crime and Delinquency 54, no. 1 (January 2008).
California Courts. Juvenile Justice Court Process. 2020. https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/juvenile-justice/court-process (diakses Juni 12, 2023).
Cohen, Morris L. “The Common Law in American Legal System: The Challenge of Conceptual Research.” Law Library Journal 81, no. 13 (1989).
Cruz, Peter de. A Modern Approach to Comparative Law. Deventer: Kluwer, 1993. Daliyo, J.B. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Prenhallindo, 2014.
Glendon, Mary Ann, Michael Wallace Gordon, dan Christopher Osakwe. “Roman Civil Law, Canon Law, and Commercial Law.” Dalam Comparative Legal Traditions, oleh Mary Ann Glendon, Michael Wallace Gordon dan Michael Osakwe. St. Paul: West Publishing.Co, 1994.
Murdiyanto, Eko. Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta Press, 2020.
Nurhadinto, Fajar. “Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal TAPI's 11, no. 1 (2015).
Purwati, Ani. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori & Praktek. Surabaya: CV. Jakad Media Publishing, 2020.
Qamar, Nurul. Perbandingan Sistem Hukum dan Peradilan. Makassar: Pustaka Refleksi Books, 2010.
"UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak." n.d.
"Welfare and Institution Code – WIC Part 1. Delinquents and Wards of the Juvenile Court Chapter 2. Juvenile Court Law." n.d.
Zane, Steven N., Brandon C. Welsh, dan Daniel P. Mears. “Juvenile Transfer and Specific Detterence Hypothesis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” American Society of Criminology: Criminology & Public Policy 15, no. 3 (2016).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jesslyn Nathania
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).