Legality of the Position of Advocates as Reporting Parties in the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.724Keywords:
Advocate, TPPU, Conflict of Norms.Abstract
A mortgage aims to provide protection and legal certainty for stakeholders, one of which is the mortgage-holding creditor. However, in practice, this goal has not been fully realized, as existing mortgages can still be annulled by the court. Debtors must still be held accountable if the collateral bound by the mortgage is annulled by the court, such as for expenses already incurred by the creditors and for the loss of expected profits from the loan. Another effort creditors can make to reclaim their prioritized rights from the debtor is to require the debtor to replace the collateral annulled by the court with another asset of equal nominal value, and then impose a new mortgage on the replacement asset, such as in the form of a mortgage, fiduciary, hypothec, or pledge.
References
Arief, B. N. (2013). Criminal Law Capita Selecta (3rd ed.). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Arifin, I. (2021). Legal Study on the Proof of Elements of Concealment and Obfuscation in Money Laundering Cases (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK).
Bahreisy, B. (2018). Implementation of Money Laundering Laws on State Losses from Corruption Cases. Journal of Indonesian Legislation, 15(2), 104–105.
Berutu, A. G. (2019). Money Laundering Crimes in the Perspective of the Indonesian Penal Code and Islamic Criminal Law. Journal of Sharia Economic Law, 2(1), 2.
Darma, I. M. W. (2020). Legal Reform on Contempt of Court Delict in the Draft Indonesian Criminal Code 2019. Journal of Legal Studies, 16(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v16i2.3314
Darma, I. M. W. (2021). New Paradigm of Indonesian Criminal Law Policy to Formulate Sanctions for Cases of Customary Crimes. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 8(2), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v8n2.a6
Government Regulation No. 43 of 2015 on Reporting Parties in Money Laundering Prevention and Eradication in conjunction with Government Regulation No. 61 of 2021 on Amendments to Government Regulation No. 43 of 2015 on Reporting Parties in Money Laundering Prevention and Eradication.
Hanafi, M. F. & Firdaus, S. N. (2022). Implementation of Hans Nawiasky’s Theory in Indonesian Legislation. Journal of Democracy and National Resilience, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.13057/souvereignty.v1i1.192
Haswandi, Mulyadi, L., & Suhariyanto, B. (2017). Criminal Penalty System for Money Laundering Offenders (1st ed.). Jakarta: Research and Development Center for Law and Justice, Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
HS, S., & Nurbani, E. S. (2016). Application of Legal Theory in Thesis and Dissertation Research (1st ed., 4th print). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Imron, A. (2019). Enforcement, Prevention, and Eradication of Money Laundering Based on National Risk Assessment. Journal of Satya Kencana Dua: Dynamics of Legal Problems and Justice, 6(1), 682-711.
Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP)
Irfani, N. (2020). Principles of Lex Superior, Lex Spesialis, and Lex Posterior: Interpretation, Problems, and Usage in Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Journal of Indonesian Legislation, 16(3), 305-325. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711
Laowo, Y. S. (2022). Legal Study of Money Laundering. Journal of Justice Arrow, 1(1), 70–87.
Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Legislation
Law No. 15 of 2002 on Money Laundering
Law No. 15 of 2002 on Money Laundering in conjunction with Law No. 25 of 2003 amending
Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates
Law No. 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering
Lubis, F. (2020). Advocates vs Money Laundering. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama Publishing Group.
Lukman, N., & Ruchimat, T. (2019). Review on the Reporting Obligation of Financial Transactions by Advocates under Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates in Conjunction with Government Regulation No. 43 of 2015 on Reporting Parties in Money Laundering Prevention and Eradication. Journal of Adigama Law, 2(2), 1-20.
Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Legal Research (Revised ed.). Jakarta: Kenyan Prenada Media Group.
Mertha, I. K. (2016). Criminal Law Textbook. Faculty of Law, Udayana University Denpasar.
Ongkowijaya, Y., Helvis, & Markoni. (2021). Advocates’ Obligation in Preventing Suspicious Financial Transactions. Journal of Syntax Admiration, 2(11), 2185-2198. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v2ill.347
Pratiwi, L. (2018). Harmonization and Synchronization of Laws Regarding Differences in Regulation of Imported Goods in New Conditions. Journal of Law Ius Quia Iustum, 25(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art4
Regulation of the Head of the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center No. 11 of 2016 on the Procedures for Reporting Suspicious Financial Transactions for Professions.
Satriatama, D., W. H., & T. H. (2020). Efforts to Synchronize the Asynchrony of Warehouse Receipts Regulations in East Java. Novum: Journal of Law, 7(5), 111–123.
Soekanto, S. (2008). Introduction to Legal Research. Jakarta: University of Indonesia (UI Press).
Sudibyo, A., & Rahman, A. S. (2021). Deconstruction of the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law. Journal of Presumption of Law, Faculty of Law, Majalengka University, 3(1), 55-79.
Suyanto, H. W. (2018). Norm Conflict Between Government Regulation No. 78 of 2015 on Wages and Law No. 3 of 2003 on Employment. Justitia Journal of Law, 2(2), 331-341.
Suyanto. (2018). Introduction to Criminal Law (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Terina, T., & Renaldy, R. (2020). Problems of Notaries' Obligation to Report Suspicious Financial Transactions. Journal of Notarial Law Science, 8(2), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9il.606
Yanuar, M. A. (2020). Discourse on the Status of Money Laundering as an Independent Crime versus Follow-Up Crime Post Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XIII/2015. Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(4), 721. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1643
Yoserwan & Nani, M. (2021). Economic Criminal Law (1st ed., 1st print). Depok: Rajawali Pers
Yudistira, R. A. S. (2018). Advocates' Accountability as Gatekeepers in Relation to Money Laundering Crimes. Journal of Media Luris, 1(2), 350-372. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.vli2.8835.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Martina Nilamsari, I Made Wirya Darma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
