Institutional Gridlock in Food Security Policy: A Neo-Institutionalist Analysis of Urban Food Governance in Indonesia

Authors

  • Ahmad Ridwan Dalimunthe Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Indonesia
  • Nurliah Nurdin Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Indonesia
  • Muhadam Labolo Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Indonesia
  • Tumpak Haposan Simanjuntak Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.749

Keywords:

Reconstruction of Performance Measurement Model, Regional House of Representatives (DPRD),, Penta Helix, Regional Governance,, Regional Autonomy.

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of institutional gridlock in urban food security governance in Indonesia, focusing on the complexities of interactions among government institutions and their impact on policy effectiveness. Utilizing a neo-institutionalist approach, this research analyzes how institutional fragmentation, conflicts of interest, and the historical legacy of power centralization contribute to the formation of gridlock that hampers the effective implementation of food security policies in urban areas. Through comprehensive analysis of policy documents and academic literature, the study identifies patterns of institutional interaction, explores the manifestations and consequences of institutional gridlock, and evaluates the potential of institutional bricolage as a strategy to overcome existing structural barriers. The key findings indicate that institutional gridlock in this context results from the complex interaction between path dependency, institutional layering, and political fragmentation, which creates inertia against the necessary policy changes to address contemporary urban food security challenges. This study contributes to the development of a conceptual framework for understanding and addressing institutional gridlock in public policy governance in developing countries, particularly in the context of decentralization and rapid urbanization.

References

Bonanno, F. (2019). Why regions fail (or succeed). The Role of Government Institutions in the Long-Run. European Journal of Government and Economics (EJGE), 8(2), 114–144.

Dzionek-Koz?owska, J. (2015). New institutional economics’ perspective on wealth and poverty of nations. Concise review and general remarks on Acemoglu and Robinson’s concept. Analele ?tiin?ifice Ale Universit??ii» Alexandru Ioan Cuza «din Ia?i. ?tiin?e Economice, 62(Spec), 11–18.

Hagerer, I., & Hoppe, U. (2019). German Universities as Actors in Organizational Design–A Qualitative Study. HEAD’19. 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 395–404.

Hartati, S., Yahya, M. R., & Sutrisno, S. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM KETAHANAN PANGAN DALAM BIDANG PERTANIAN DI DESA MAYANG SARI. JDP (JURNAL DINAMIKA PEMERINTAHAN), 7(1), 107–119.

Held, D. (2016). Elements of a theory of global governance. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 42(9), 837–846.

Held, D., Kickbusch, I., McNally, K., Piselli, D., & Told, M. (2019). Gridlock, innovation and resilience in global health governance. Global Policy, 10(2), 161–177.

Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2012). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Irarrázaval, G. H. (2023). The fiscal origins of comparative inequality levels: an empirical and historical investigation. Economics Department Working Papers, 525.

Maseland, R. (2018). Is colonialism history? The declining impact of colonial legacies on African institutional and economic development. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(2), 259–287.

Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13(4), 475–499.

Prabayanti, H. (2022). Determinan Ketahanan Pangan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Pangan, 31(3), 191–198.

Putri, D. L., Abidin, Z., Prasmatiwi, F. E., & Kaskoyo, H. (2022). Kajian Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga pada Berbagai Agroekosistem di Kabupaten Lampung Utara. Jurnal Agrikultura, 33(3), 420–428.

Rumata, V. M. (2015). Dinamika Tata Kelola Kebijakan Industri Penyiaran dan Telekomunikasi Indonesia Menuju Konvergensi: Sebuah Studi Paradigma Interpretatif. Jurnal Penelitian Pos Dan Informatika, 5(1), 87–108.

Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9–29.

WARDIYANTO, B., & SETIJANINGRUM, E. (2023). Inovasi Kebijakan Badan Usaha Milik Desa untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Asli Desa dalam Perspektif Neo Institusionalisme. Journal of Social Development Studies, 4(2).

Downloads

Published

2024-09-23

How to Cite

Dalimunthe, A. R., Nurdin, N., Labolo, M., & Simanjuntak, T. H. (2024). Institutional Gridlock in Food Security Policy: A Neo-Institutionalist Analysis of Urban Food Governance in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(6), 2236–2242. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.749