Institutional Gridlock in Food Security Policy: A Neo-Institutionalist Analysis of Urban Food Governance in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.749Keywords:
Reconstruction of Performance Measurement Model, Regional House of Representatives (DPRD),, Penta Helix, Regional Governance,, Regional Autonomy.Abstract
This study examines the phenomenon of institutional gridlock in urban food security governance in Indonesia, focusing on the complexities of interactions among government institutions and their impact on policy effectiveness. Utilizing a neo-institutionalist approach, this research analyzes how institutional fragmentation, conflicts of interest, and the historical legacy of power centralization contribute to the formation of gridlock that hampers the effective implementation of food security policies in urban areas. Through comprehensive analysis of policy documents and academic literature, the study identifies patterns of institutional interaction, explores the manifestations and consequences of institutional gridlock, and evaluates the potential of institutional bricolage as a strategy to overcome existing structural barriers. The key findings indicate that institutional gridlock in this context results from the complex interaction between path dependency, institutional layering, and political fragmentation, which creates inertia against the necessary policy changes to address contemporary urban food security challenges. This study contributes to the development of a conceptual framework for understanding and addressing institutional gridlock in public policy governance in developing countries, particularly in the context of decentralization and rapid urbanization.
References
Bonanno, F. (2019). Why regions fail (or succeed). The Role of Government Institutions in the Long-Run. European Journal of Government and Economics (EJGE), 8(2), 114–144.
Dzionek-Koz?owska, J. (2015). New institutional economics’ perspective on wealth and poverty of nations. Concise review and general remarks on Acemoglu and Robinson’s concept. Analele ?tiin?ifice Ale Universit??ii» Alexandru Ioan Cuza «din Ia?i. ?tiin?e Economice, 62(Spec), 11–18.
Hagerer, I., & Hoppe, U. (2019). German Universities as Actors in Organizational Design–A Qualitative Study. HEAD’19. 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 395–404.
Hartati, S., Yahya, M. R., & Sutrisno, S. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM KETAHANAN PANGAN DALAM BIDANG PERTANIAN DI DESA MAYANG SARI. JDP (JURNAL DINAMIKA PEMERINTAHAN), 7(1), 107–119.
Held, D. (2016). Elements of a theory of global governance. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 42(9), 837–846.
Held, D., Kickbusch, I., McNally, K., Piselli, D., & Told, M. (2019). Gridlock, innovation and resilience in global health governance. Global Policy, 10(2), 161–177.
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2012). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Irarrázaval, G. H. (2023). The fiscal origins of comparative inequality levels: an empirical and historical investigation. Economics Department Working Papers, 525.
Maseland, R. (2018). Is colonialism history? The declining impact of colonial legacies on African institutional and economic development. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(2), 259–287.
Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13(4), 475–499.
Prabayanti, H. (2022). Determinan Ketahanan Pangan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Pangan, 31(3), 191–198.
Putri, D. L., Abidin, Z., Prasmatiwi, F. E., & Kaskoyo, H. (2022). Kajian Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga pada Berbagai Agroekosistem di Kabupaten Lampung Utara. Jurnal Agrikultura, 33(3), 420–428.
Rumata, V. M. (2015). Dinamika Tata Kelola Kebijakan Industri Penyiaran dan Telekomunikasi Indonesia Menuju Konvergensi: Sebuah Studi Paradigma Interpretatif. Jurnal Penelitian Pos Dan Informatika, 5(1), 87–108.
Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9–29.
WARDIYANTO, B., & SETIJANINGRUM, E. (2023). Inovasi Kebijakan Badan Usaha Milik Desa untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Asli Desa dalam Perspektif Neo Institusionalisme. Journal of Social Development Studies, 4(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Ridwan Dalimunthe, Nurliah Nurdin, Muhadam Labolo, Tumpak Haposan Simanjuntak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).