Legal Consequences of a Notarial Deed That Does Not Accord to the Facts And is Not Signed in the Presence of a Notary (Study Decision Number 46/Pdt.G/2023/PN Cbi)

Authors

  • Christy Chandra Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Tjempaka Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.820

Keywords:

Notarial Deed, Authority, Validity, Unlawful Acts

Abstract

Indonesia has established its country as a rule of law so one of the goals of a rule of law is to create legal certainty in every interaction between society and the state. The agreement made by a notary in a notarial deed is a manifestation of legal certainty. Laws Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Laws Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notaries has given authority to notaries to make authentic deeds. One of the problems that often occurs is that the contents of the notarial deed are not by the wishes of the person present and are not signed in the presence of a notary. The purpose of this research is to determine the validity of a deed that was not made according to the wishes of the appeared and was not signed before a Notary and its application in the case of Decision Number 46/Pdt.G/2023/PN Cbi. This research uses normative legal research methods with an approach to legal cases (case study) and statute approach using secondary data types and data collection techniques, namely interviews and document studies, as well as using legal analysis and prescriptive data collection techniques. Based on the results of this research, it is necessary to know that the validity and legal force of a deed that has been made by a Notary but not in the appeared, where the contents of the deed are not per the wishes of the appearer and is not signed in the presence of the Notary, then the action carried out by the Notary is unlawful acts regulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code so that the person appearing can ask the Notary to be held civilly responsible as in the case in decision Number 46/Pdt/G/2023/PN Cbi..

References

Polak, Veegens Oppenheim. Serba-Serbi Praktek Notariat. (Bandung : Tan Thong Kie, 1987).

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1993).

Tobing, G.H.S. Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. (Jakarta: Erlangga, 1996).

Ahmad Yani dan Gunawan Widjaja. Seri Hukum Bisnis Perseroan Terbatas. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000).

Notodisoerjo, Soegond. Hukum Notariat di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan. (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2006).

Asshidiqie, Jimly. Menuju Hukum Yang Demokratis. (Jakarta : Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2009).

Budiono, Herlien. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan. (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013).

Adjie, Habib, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik). (Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2013).

H.S, Salim. Teknik Pembuatan Suatu Akta (Konsep Teoritis, Kewenangan Notaris, Bentuk dan Minuta Akta). (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015).

P, Andi. Apa dan Siapa Notaris di Indonesia?. (Surabaya: Perwida Md Nusantara, 2015).

Darus, Muhammad Luthfan Hadi. Hukum Notariat dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2017).

Makarim, Edmon. Notaris dan Transaksi Elektronik, Kajian Hukum tentang Cybernotary atau Electronic. (Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020).

Wahyu Satya Wibowo et al. Integritas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. (Recital Review, Vol. , 2022).

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia, No. 75, 1959).

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 106, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4756).

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 117, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4432).

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 3, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5491).

Darusman, Y.M. “Kedudukan notaris sebagai pejabat pembuat akta autentik dan sebagai pejabat pembuat akta tanah”. Jurnal Hukum, Vol 7 No.1.

Admkn. “Perlunya Penguatan Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Jabatannya”. https://mkn.unissula.ac.id/perlunya-penguatan-kode-etik-notaris-dalam-pelaksanaan-jabatannya/.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. https://kbbi.web.id/tanggung%20jawab. 30 Juli 2024.

Siti Badriyah. ”Kerangka Konseptual: Pengertian, Tujuan, dan Cara Membuat”. https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/kerangka-konseptual/.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-12

How to Cite

Christy Chandra, & Tjempaka. (2024). Legal Consequences of a Notarial Deed That Does Not Accord to the Facts And is Not Signed in the Presence of a Notary (Study Decision Number 46/Pdt.G/2023/PN Cbi). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(1), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.820

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Christy Chandra, Tjempaka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).