Restitutio in Integrum in Criminal Regulation of Restitution for the Victims of Criminal Acts

Authors

  • Celine Endang Patricia Sitanggang Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Jennifer Kurnia Putri Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Albertus Hansen Setyabudi Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Sheyla Alif Alfiana Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.829

Keywords:

Restitutio in Integrum, Restitution, Victim

Abstract

This study aims to determine the application of the Restitutio in Integrum principle in Indonesian laws and regulations governing restitution to victims of criminal acts. It is currently known that the weakness of restitution execution power in Indonesia has made the fulfillment of restitution to victims difficult to realize. This is because there is no binding force, so that the implementation of restitution is oriented towards the goodwill of the perpetrator of the crime. The research method used in this article is normative juridical with statute approach and conceptual approach. This study argues that restitution arrangements in various laws and regulations in Indonesia do not accommodate forced efforts if the perpetrators of criminal acts do not carry out restitution. In this case, the lacuna results in the difficulty of executing payments that should be received by victims of criminal acts. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the application of the principle of restitutio in integrum which is studied through substance, structure, and legal culture as an effort to realize protection as well as justice for victims of inclusive criminal acts.

References

Afif, Said. “Konsep Negara Hukum Rule Of Law Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Jurnal Pionir LPPM Universitas Asahan Vol. 2, no. No. 5 (2018): 55–60.

Apriyani, Maria Novita. “Implementasi Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual” 17 (2021).

Arfiani, Arfiani Arfiani, Khairul Khairul Fahmi, Beni Kharisma Arrasuli, Indah Nadilah Nadilah, and Miftahul Fikri Fikri. “PENEGAKAN HUKUM SESUAI PRINSIP PERADILAN YANG BERKEPASTIAN, ADIL DAN MANUSIAWI?: STUDI PEMANTAUAN PROSES PENEGAKAN HUKUM TAHUN 2020.” Riau Law Journal 6, no. 1 (May 29, 2022): 48. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v6i1.7938.

Chandrawaty, Yenny. “PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP PEREMPUAN KORBAN HUMAN TRAFFICKING SEBAGAI WUJUD PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17, no. 4 (December 30, 2020): 459. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i4.755.

Cragg, Wesley. The Practice of Punishment: Toward a Theory of Restorative Justice. London, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 1992.

DiBari, Dennis F. “RESTORING RESTITUTION: THE ROLE OF PROXIMATE CAUSATION IN CHILD PORNOGRAPHY POSSESSION CASES WHERE RESTITUTION IS SOUGHT.” CARDOZO LAW REVIEW 33 (n.d.).

Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo, Zainal Abidin, Emerson Yuntho, and Wahyu Wagiman. MASUKAN TERHADAP PERUBAHAN UU NO 13 TAHUN 2006 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN. Jakarta: KOALISI PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN, 2014.

Faisal, Faisal, and Muhammad Rustamaji. “Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana Dalam RUU KUHP.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 10, no. 2 (July 30, 2021): 291. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p08.

Fakultas Hukum Terbaik di Medan Sumut. “Pengertian Supremasi Hukum,” May 11, 2023. https://fahum.umsu.ac.id/pengertian-supremasi-hukum/.

FUAD, MUHAMMAD BUSYROL. “Restitusi Korban, Jauh Panggang dari Api.” kompas.id, August 4, 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2023/08/03/restitusi-korban-jauh-panggang-dari-api.

Gavrielides, Theo. Restorative Justice Theory and Practice: Addressing the Discrepancy. Helsinki, Finland: European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, 2007.

Hibrawan, Aryatama. “IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE BY JUDGES THROUGH IMMOSING CONDITIONAL CRIMINAL DECISIONS,” n.d.

Hirsch, Andrew von, Roberts Julian, Anthony E Bottoms, Kent Roach, and Mara Schiff. Restorative Justice & Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms. England: Hart Publishing, 2003.

“Https://Www.Kompas.Id/Baca/Opini/2023/08/13/Pidana-Penjara-Pengganti-Restitusi.” Accessed April 18, 2024. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2023/08/13/pidana-penjara-pengganti-restitusi.

“Implementasi PP Restitusi Anak Korban Butuh Kemauan Aparat Penegak Hukum | ICJR.” Accessed February 22, 2024. https://icjr.or.id/implementasi-pp-restitusi-anak-korban-butuh-kemauan-aparat-penegak-hukum/.

Joshua, Dressler. Encylopedia of Crime and Justice: Juvenile Justice, Juvenile Court-Rural Crime. Vol. Vol. III. New York: Gale Group Thomson Learning, 2002.

LaFave, Wayne R. Principles of Criminal Law. Second Edition. USA: West A Thomson Bussines, 2010.

Manullang, E. Fernando M. “ORDERING RESTITUTION TO THE CRIME VICTIM.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 453–80. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.2.453-480.

Marasabessy, Fauzy. “RESTITUSI BAGI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA: SEBUAH TAWARAN MEKANISME BARU.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 45, no. 1 (February 24, 2016): 53. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol45.no1.9.

Mareta, Josefhin. “PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI PEMENUHAN RESTITUSI PADA KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA ANAK.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 15, no. No. 4 (Desember 2018): 309–19.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

Megret, Frederic. “Justifying Compensation by the International Criminal Court’s Victims Trust Fund: Lessons from Domestic Compensation Schemes.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1501295.

Mertokusumo, R.M. Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007.

Muladi, H. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.

Mulyadi, Lilik. “UPAYA HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN KORBAN KEJAHATAN DIKAJI DARI PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG RI.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 1, no. 1 (March 30, 2012): 1. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.1-34.

Putri, Theodora Syah. Upaya Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan. Jakarta: UI Press, 2006.

Rahmawati, Anissa, and Otto Yudianto. “PENGATURAN PEMBERIAN RESTITUSI DALAM SUATU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 22-K/PMT-II/AD/II/2022).” Bureaucracy Journal?: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. No. 2 (Mei-Agustus 2023): 1677–96.

Rizki, Akbari Anugerah, Praptadina Sri Bayuningsih, and Lovina. Studi Pemulihan Korban Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Cetakan I. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasasn Korupsi RI, 2021.

Sabri, Fadillah. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DENGAN RESTITUSI TERHADAP ANAK YANG MENJADI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA.” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 6, no. 4 (January 4, 2023): 398. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.293.

Satria, Hariman. “RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: PARADIGMA BARU PERADILAN PIDANA.” Jurnal Media Hukum 25, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0107.111-123.

Soeparman, H. Parman. Kepentingan Korban Tindak Pidana Dilihat Dari Sudut Viktimologi, Refika Aditama, Varia Peradilan. Majalah Hukum Tahun ke XXII., n.d.

Widowati, Christiani. “HUKUM SEBAGAI NORMA SOSIAL MEMILIKI SIFAT MEWAJIBKAN.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (June 30, 2015): 150–67. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v4i1.31.

Wijaya, Sandy Ari, and Widya Hartati. “Implementasi Kebijakan Asas Restitutio In Integrum Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Pertambangan Tanpa Izin” 04, no. 01 (2023).

Yulia, Rena. Viktimologi?: Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2010.

Zulkipli. “Kompensasi Dan Restitusi Bagi Korban Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Yang Berat.” Universitas Indonesia, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-12

How to Cite

Celine Endang Patricia Sitanggang, Jennifer Kurnia Putri, Albertus Hansen Setyabudi, & Sheyla Alif Alfiana. (2024). Restitutio in Integrum in Criminal Regulation of Restitution for the Victims of Criminal Acts. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(1), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.829