Nuclear Weapons From the Lens of the UN Charter

Authors

  • Syifa Syarifa University of Glasgow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.843

Keywords:

Nuclear Weapons, The UN Charter, Law

Abstract

Nuclear weapons have been a longstanding topic of debate in international law, as their presence brings up concerns about their legality and morality in relation to global peace and security, which are core principles of the United Nations (UN). This article analyses the provisions related to the possession, use, and threat of use of nuclear weapons under the UN Charter. Employing a qualitative approach and normative method, this article examines relevant legal documents and scholarly literature. The analysis shows that while the UN Charter does not directly regulate nuclear weapons, its principles have laid the foundation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). The possession of nuclear weapons is legally permitted for certain states under the NPT, provided they make sincere efforts toward achieving complete disarmament. Additionally, the use and threat of use of nuclear weapons must comply with the principles of international humanitarian law and customary law, which inherently cannot be fulfilled by nuclear weapons due to their nature.

References

Aljazeera. (2024, June 5). Putin warns West over Ukraine armaments, nuclear arsenal. Retrieved from Aljazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/5/putin-warns-west-over-ukraine-armaments-nuclear-arsenal-in-news-conference

Asmar, A. (2023, November 9). Palestine complains to IAEA about Israel's threat to drop nuclear bomb on Gaza. Retrieved from Anadolu Ajansi: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/palestine-complains-to-iaea-about-israels-threat-to-drop-nuclear-bomb-on-gaza/3048066

Asada, M. (2021). ‘Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament under International Law’. In R. Geiß, & N. Melzer, The Oxford Handbook of the International Law of Global Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Corn, Geoffrey. S. (2020). ‘The Essential Link between Proportionality and Necessity in the Exercise of Self-Defense’. In Claus Kreß, & Robert Lawless, ‘Necessity and Proportionality in International Peace and Security Law’, at 80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Erästö, T. (2019, Marc 6). The NPT and the TPNW: Compatible or conflicting nuclear weapons treaties? Retrieved September 2024, from SIPRI: https://www.sipri.org/commentary/blog/2019/npt-and-tpnw-compatible-or-conflicting-nuclear-weapons-treaties

Hood, A., & Cornier, M. (2023). Nuclear Threats Under International Law Part II: Applying the Law. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 7(1), 178-193.

IAEA. (1995). ‘Decision 3: Extension on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons’. The Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on non Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Accessed 29th of November 2023. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1970/infcirc140.pdf

IAEA. (1989). ‘Statute as Amended Up to 28 December 1989’. Accessed 29th of November 2023. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/about/statute.

IAEA. (1970). ‘Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons’. INFCIRC/140. Accessed 29th of November 2023. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/publications/documents/treaties/npt

ICJ. (1996). ‘The Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons’, Reports of Judgements, Advisory Opinions and Orders.

ILPI. (2014). ‘Nuclear Weapons Under International Law: An Overview’ Report, at 8. Geneva: Geneva Academy.

J., Gabrieli, G., Cozzi, P., Vallelonga, M., Schwikowski, C., Boutron, C., & Barbante. (2013). ‘Historical reconstruction of Plutonium contamination in the Swiss-Italian Alps’, 1, at 1. E3S Web of Conferences I. EDP Sciences.

Krasno, J., & Szeli, E. (2024). The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: Strengths, Weaknesses and Current Status. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 7, 277-285.

Kirgis, F. L. (2003, January 24). North Korea's Withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Prolideration Treaty. Retrieved from American Society of International Law: https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/8/issue/2/north-koreas-withdrawal-nuclear-nonproliferation-treaty

Kristensen, H., & Korda, M. (2022). SIPRI Yearbook 2022: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Reseach Institute.

Schmitt, M.N. (1998). The International Court of Justice and the Use of Nuclear Weapons. Journal: Naval War College Review, Volume 51, Issue 2, 99.

Stockholm Internasional Peace Research Institute. (2024). SIPRI Yearbook 2024: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security. Stockholm: SIPRI.

Srogosz, T. (2016). ‘Possession of Nuclear Weapons – Between Legality and Legitimization’. Journal of ICLR.

Sonata, D. L. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum [Normative and Empirical Legal Research Methods: Distinctive Characteristics of Legal Research Methods]. Fiat Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15-35.

The General Assembly. (1994). ‘Request for an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. A/RES/49/75. Available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N95/760/03/PDF/N9576003.pdf?OpenElement

The General Assembly. (2017). ‘Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons’. A/CONF.229/2017/8.

Available at: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n17/209/73/pdf/n1720973.pdf

The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, ‘the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflict’, Additional Protocol I, 1977. Accessed 27th of November 2023. Available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977

The Hague Convention IV with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land, No. 38, 1907. Accessed 27th of November 2023. Available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-iv-1907?activeTab=undefined

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

How to Cite

Syifa Syarifa. (2024). Nuclear Weapons From the Lens of the UN Charter. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(1), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.843