Legal Protection of the Office of Notary against the Principle of Confidentiality in View of Article 66 Paragraph (4) of the Notary Law

Authors

  • Nadhea Tungga Devi Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ariawan Gunadi Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.845

Keywords:

Notary Honor Council, Examination, Confidentiality

Abstract

This article is entitled “Legal protection of notary positions against the principle of confidentiality in review of Article 66 paragraph (4) of the UUJN”. The research method used is normative juridical research, using secondary data to analyze legal issues. The result of the research is that the legal protection of notaries in maintaining the confidentiality of the contents of their authentic deeds is not effective with the application of article 66 paragraph (4) of the UUJN by law enforcement in examining notaries. This is due to the absence of implementing regulations for article 175 of Law No. 6 of 2023 Jo article 66 paragraph (4) of UUJN, which has implications for the examination of notaries without protection and legal defense efforts to submit to law enforcement photocopies of the Deed Minute and/or letters attached to the Deed Minute or Notary Protocol in the Notary's storage which are confidential and guaranteed by law. Direct examination of notaries based on Constitutional Court Decision 20 PK/PID/2020 if MKN does not respond to law enforcement's request for notary examination (Article 66 (4) UUJN). 

References

Azhari, T., A, T. K. D., & Leviza, J. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.16/Puuxviii/2020 Dalam Perkara Pengajuan Yudicial Review Pasal 66 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undangundang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Wahana Inovasi, 11(1), 134.

Eka, N., Zahro, F., & Basri, A. H. (2023). Konsep Permohonan Keputusan Fiktif Positif Pasca Berlakunya Pasal 175 Angka 7 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 1(1), 1–23.

Iryadi, I. (2020). Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9(3), 481. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i3.484

Kasus, S., Mahkamah, P., No, A., & Pid, P. K. (2022). MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NOTARIS Amira Budi Athira , Siti Hajati Hoesin . …. 08(20), 565–579.

Kurniawan, M. H. (2021). Peran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Proses Peradilan Notaris Di Pengadilan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XVII/2019). Indonesian Notary, 3.

Maya, E. A. (2017). Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Pembinaan Terhadap Notaris. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v5i2.455

MRizky, A. (2020). ??No Title No Title No Title. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents.

Muslim, M. J. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Merupakan Perbuatan Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 1(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v1i1.637

Nurjannah, N., Ilmar, A., & Aspan, Z. (2018). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Pemeriksaan Notaris. Riau Law Journal, 2(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v2i2.5965

Pratama, S. M. (2020). Pengaturan Baru Keputusan Fiktif Positif Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dan Kaitannya Dengan Kompetensi PTUN. Jurnal RECHTSVINDING, November, 1–4.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Nadhea Tungga Devi, & Ariawan Gunadi. (2024). Legal Protection of the Office of Notary against the Principle of Confidentiality in View of Article 66 Paragraph (4) of the Notary Law. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(1), 500–508. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.845

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Nadhea Tungga Devi, Ariawan Gunadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).