The Existence of the Corruption Eradication Commission Leadership in Investigations After the Enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.922Keywords:
Existence, Investigation, KPK LeadershipAbstract
This study aims to show how the existence of the KPK Leadership as investigators after the enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019 and what its implications are. The preparation of this research was carried out using the type of Normative Juridical research with a statute-approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Based on the research conducted, the authority of the KPK Leadership as investigators has been lost since the enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019 and has had an impact on the failure to realize legal certainty in handling corruption cases, especially in the investigation process. By understanding the concept of authority based on the principle of legality, and by comparing the regulation of authority in the KPK Law and the Prosecutor's Law, it can be seen that regulations must be written clearly in accordance with the principle of lex scripta. It is necessary to carry out reconceptualization and written regulations related to the authority of the KPK Leadership. This research is expected to be able to provide insight to the public and can be a reference for everyone to realize legal certainty, justice and benefits, especially in handling corruption cases.
References
Adnani, A. (2021). Civil Society di Indonesia: Suatu Konsekuensi Logis Terwujudnya Good Governance. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 3(4), 90–96.
Alwi, H. (2022). Implikasi Hukum Hilangnya Kewenangan Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Pimpinan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya.
Amelia Ayu Paramitha, Ibnu Sam Widodo, Fakhry Amin, Muhammad Fajar Sidiq Widodo, Hutrin Kamil, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Achmad Taufik, Muhammad Aziz Zaelani, Saptono Jenar, Syaiful Anam, Ali Rahman, Suwandoko, Junaidi, Dika Yudanto, Dian Dewi Khasanah, Sir, & M. G. (2023). Hukum Administrasi Negara (A. Iftitah (ed.); Oktober 20). Sada Kurnia Pustaka. https://repository.sadapenerbit.com/index.php/books/catalog/book/98
Arif, M. F. (2023). ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK. Siyasah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 6(II).
Atmasasmita, R. (2020). A Reconstruction of The Principle of" No Punishment without guilt". Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Faubert, C., Décary-Hétu, D., Malm, A., Ratcliffe, J., & Dupont, B. (2021). Law enforcement and disruption of offline and online activities: A review of contemporary challenges. Cybercrime in Context: The Human Factor in Victimization, Offending, and Policing, 351–370.
Kanalu, N. (2020). The Pure Reason of Lex Scripta: Jurisprudential Philology and the Domain of Instituted Laws during Early British Colonial Rule in India (1770s--1820s). In Empire and Legal Thought (pp. 462–491). Brill Nijhoff.
Kansil, C. S. T., & Sundaynatha, R. A. S. (2023). Efektivitas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Sebelum dan Sesudah Menjadi Lembaga Pemerintah. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1), 951–954.
Keni, L. (2021). Penyerahan Berkas Penyidikan Perkara Dari Penyidik Kepada Penuntut Umum Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lex Crimen, 10(7).
Manan, B., Abdurahman, A., & Susanto, M. (2021). Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Yang Religius: Konsepsi Dan Tantangan Dalam Negara Berdasarkan Pancasila. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 5(2), 176–195.
Marbun, R. J., & Hasibuan, L. R. (2023). Government Intervention in Employment in Indonesia Based on Welfare State Theory. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 4(3), 574–579.
Nurdiana, K., Hamam, M. S. N., & Rifqi, M. J. (2023). Eksistensi Kode Etik Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) di Era Malpraktik Profesi Hukum. Logika: Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan, 14(02), 150–163.
Rizal, M. R. R., & Wondabio, L. S. (2023). Analisis inkonsistensi antara kinerja dengan kepercayaan publik pada komisi pemberantasan korupsi. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 7(2), 236–253.
Telaumbanua, D. (2020). Restriktif Status Dewan Pengawas KPK. Jurnal Education and Development, 8(1), 258.
Truu, M. (2022). The European Court of Human Rights and the Principle of Foreseeability (Lex Certa and Stricta): How to Determine Whether an Offence Is Clearly Defined in Criminal Law. Juridica Int’l, 31, 98.
Vukuši?, I. (2023). Lex Certa in Comparative Law. Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu, 73(1), 87–118.
Wahyuningrum, K. S., Disemadi, H. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2020). Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi: Benarkah Ada? Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 239–258.
Yulianto, Y. (2020). Politik hukum revisi undang-undang KPK yang melemahkan pemberantasan korupsi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 11(1), 111–124.
Zainuddin, M., & Karina, A. D. (2023). Penggunaan Metode Yuridis Normatif Dalam Membuktikan Kebenaran Pada Penelitian Hukum. Smart Law Journal, 2(2), 114–123.
Ziembi?ski, Z. (2020). Lex and Ius in the Period of Transformation. Przegl{k{a}}d Prawniczy Uniwersytetu Im. Adama Mickiewicza, 10, 111–129.
Zubi, M., Marzuki, M., & Affan, I. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hak-Hak Normatif Tenaga Kerja Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Omnibus Law). Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 3(3), 1171–1195.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Sahroni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
