Position and Legal Consequences of Evidence of Old Rights That Are Not Converted and Controlled by Other Parties (Study of Decision No. 94/Pdt.G/2023/PN Amb)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.927Keywords:
Conversion, Certificate, Eigendom Verponding, Unlawful Acts, Legal CertaintyAbstract
This research focuses on analyzing the legal position of holders of old certificates of title that have not been converted and the legal consequences of physical control of land by other parties who have land certificates. This study uses Decision No. 94/Pdt.G/2023/PN Amb as a case study to understand how courts balance the interests of disputing parties and apply agrarian law regulations in land ownership conflicts. This research was motivated by implementing the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) no. 5 of 1960, which requires converting Western rights such as Eigendom Verponding into rights recognized in the Indonesian legal system. This conversion process is regulated by Government Regulation (PP) no. 18 of 2021, but there are still many old rights holders who have not converted because they allow permits, the permit procedures are considered complicated and are permitted by law. Decision Case No. 94/Pdt.G/2023/PN Amb shows that the old right holder can maintain their rights if they can provide legal proof of ownership, even though another party physically controls the land. This research uses a normative juridical approach by examining statutory regulations, legal doctrine, and court decisions. The data analysis technique was carried out descriptively and qualitatively to evaluate the legal position of old rights and land certificates and their implications in agrarian disputes. Based on the analysis, physical control of land without legal proof of ownership is considered an unlawful act per Article 1365 of the Civil Code. The court in this case decided that the holder of the old right which had not been converted still had the right to the land, and the certificate obtained without a valid legal basis was declared invalid. This research highlights the importance of converting old rights to create legal certainty and prevent future land disputes. This conversion not only provides stronger legal protection for land owners but also ensures legal certainty for the next generation who inherits the land.
References
Ammar, Dikko. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Akibat Membangun Rumah di Atas Tanah Wakaf”. Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata. (Vol. 5 No. 2 Edisi Mei 2023).
Harsono, Boedi. (2003). Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Ibrahim, Moh. “Mengungkap Fakta Pembatalan Hak Kepemilikan Tanah Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960”. Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis. (Vol. 1 No. 1 Januari 2021).
Liadi, William Seven. “Kedudukan Eigendom Verponding dalam Hukum Pertanahan di Indonesia”. Jurnal Panorama Hukum. (Vol. 4 No. 1 Juni 2019).
Masriani, Yulies Tiena. “Pentingnya Kepemilikan Sertifikat Tanah Melalui Pendaftaran Tanah Sebagai Bukti Hak”. Jurnal USM Law Review. (Vol. 5 No. 2 Tahun 2022).
Moertiono, R. Juli. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Akibat Penguasaan Tanah Tanpa Hak”. Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata. (Vol. 2 No. 1 Januari 2020).
Mujiburohman, Dian Aries. “Legalisasi Tanah-Tanah Bekas Hak Eigendom”. Jurnal Yudisial. (Vol. 14 No. 1 April 2021).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Atas Tanah, Satuan Rumah Susun, dan Pendaftaran Tanah (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2021 Nomor 28, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6630)
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1997 Nomor 59, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3696)
Polwanti, Nola. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Hak Eigendom Sebagai Dasar Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Untuk Membatalkan Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan Diatasnya (Putusan Nomor 3042/K/PDT/2021)”. Jurnal Law of Deli Sumatera. (Vol II No. 1 Desember 2022).
Wibawa, Raden Ari Setya. “Analisis Yuridis Pendaftaran Hak Atas Tanah Secara Sporadik Melalui Konversi Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Di Kabupaten Semarang”. Jurnal Akta Notaris. (Vol. 3 No. 1 Juni 2024).
Winata, Meta Nadia. “Analisis Terhadap Tanda Bukti Hak Lama sebagai Petunjuk Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021”. Indonesia Notary. (Vol. 3 Article 44 2021).
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2014). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1960 Nomor 104, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 2043).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Achmad Dwi Saputra, Amad Sudiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
