The Cohabitation Snare of the Criminal Code Law: Legal Culture Perspective of Individualism and Social Mechanic Solidarity in Legal Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.998Keywords:
Cohabitation, Legal Culture, Theory of Social SolidarityAbstract
This research aims to analyze the emergence of the cohabitation article from the perspective of legal sociology. The research method used is an empirical juridical type. The data used are primary and secondary data. Data collection techniques were carried out by interviewing 3 (three) respondents from teenagers and parents, as well as library study techniques from relevant books and journals. Data processing is presented using qualitative descriptive techniques. The research results show that the cohabitation article was born from the legal culture of modern social values, one of which is individualism embraced by society, so this encourages the legal behavior of law makers to make legal changes by criminalizing cohabitation. From Durkheim's theory of mechanical solidarity, cohabitation becomes criminalization because there are groups of people who have collective similarities who feel that cohabitation is important to be criminalized.
References
Amiruddin dan H. Zainal Asikin. (2016). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.
Arif, A. M. (2020). Perspektif Teori Sosial Emile Durkheim Dalam Sosiologi Pendidikan. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 1(2), 1-14.
Bambang Waluyo. (2008). Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Bella, R. N. (1973). Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Daniel L. (1996). Seven Theories of Religion. Oxford University Press, New York.
Durkheim, Emile. (1895). The Rules of Sociological Method. Free Press, New York.
Durkheim, Emile. (1989). Sosiologi dan Filsafat, terj. Soedjono Dirdjosiswono. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Durkheim, Emile. (2003). The Elementary Forms of Religions Life, terj. Inyak Ridwan Muzir, Sejarah Agama. Ircsod, Yogyakarta.
Effran. (2024). Tren Kumpul Kebo Meningkat di Indonesia, ini Penyebab dan Dampak Negatifnya. Diakses pada https://Lampost.Co/Humaniora/Tren-Kumpul-Kebo-Meningkat-Di-Indonesia-Ini-Penyebab-Dan-Dampak-Negatifnya/, tanggal 27 Oktober 2024.
George Ritzer, D. J. G. (2007). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta.
Humas Kemenkumham Jabar. (2024). Dirjen HAM: KUHP Baru Mengenai Kohabitasi Dalam Hak Asasi Manusia. Diakses pada https://Jabar.Kemenkumham.Go.Id/Berita-Utama/Dirjen-Ham-Kuhp-Baru-Mengenai-Kohabitasi-Dalam-Hak-Asasi-Manusia, tanggal 27 Oktober 2024.
Ibnu Jamil, U. al-K. (2016). Pemikiran Emil Durkheim. Jurnal Sosiologi Research, 1(1).
Islam, J. S., Soleh, M., & Kuncoro, I. (2023). Menggali Budaya Baru Dan Implikasinya Bagi Keagamaan Gen-Z: Perspektif Sosiologi Dan Antropologi Masyarakat Di Era Kontemporer. Al Irsyad Jurnal Studi Islam 2(2), 2961–9025. https://doi.org/10.54150/alirsyad.v2i2.233
Kamiruddin. (2011). Fungsi Sosiologi Agama: Studi Profan dan Imanen Emile Durkheim. Jurnal Toleransi Dan Komunikasi Umat, 3(2).
Lukes S. (1978). , Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. Penguin Books, Harmonds Worth.
Muhammad Surya Bimantoro, Kamaruddin, & Arifai. (2024). Dampak Perubahan Nilai-Nilai Hukum Dalam Masyarakat Tradisional Dan Modern. Journal Publicuho, 7(3), 1419–1426. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v7i3.499
Narwoko, D. J. dan B. S. (2007). Sosiologi: Teks Pengantar dan Terapan. Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta.
Peter Beilharz. (2015). Teori-Teori Sosial: Observasi Kritis terhadap Para Fiosof Terkemuka. Pustaka Belajar, Yogyakarta.
Sigit Jatmiko. (2003). Teori-teori Sosial: Observasi Kritik Terhadap Para Filosof Terkemuka. Pustaka Belajar, Yogyakarta.
Sulistiyono, B., Negeri, K., Utara, J., & Purwadi, H. (2018). Urgensi Kriminalisasi Kumpul Kebo (Cohabitation) Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 6(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Putu Pipit Pricellia Eka Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
