Peer Review Proccess

The publication of articles in the Journal of Law, Humanities and Politics (JIHHP) is solely dependent on scientific validity and coherence as assessed by our editors and / or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is understandable and whether the work is a useful contribution. for that field. The Journal of Law, Humanities and Politics (JIHHP) acknowledges the efforts and suggestions made by its reviewers.

Initial Evaluation of Manuscripts

The editor will first evaluate all submitted manuscripts. While rare, it is worthy of receiving an extraordinary script at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are not original enough, have serious scientific flaws, or fall outside the aims and scope of the Journal of Law, Humanities and Politics (JIHHP). Those who meet the minimum criteria are forwarded to a team of reviewers for review.

Kind of peer review

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientific and reasonable, whether it is a duplicate of an already published work, and whether it is clear enough to be published. The method is blind peer review.

Review Report

Reviewers are asked to evaluate:

Errors (terms or procedures),
Experimental design,
The methodology used by the study was reported,
The significance and importance of the findings,
Originality and implications in the field,
Missing or inaccurate references,
Have the results / findings clearly presented and support the conclusions, and
Follow appropriate ethical guidelines.
Reviewers are not expected to correct or copy manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.


The reviewer advises the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. Editors will reach a decision based on this report and, if necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. The editor's decision is final.

Become a Reviewer

If you are not currently a reviewer for the Journal of Law, Humanities and Politics (JIHHP) but would like to be added to the reviewers list, please contact us. The benefits of a review for the Journal of Law, Humanities and Politics (JIHHP) include the opportunity to view and evaluate recent work in related research areas at an early stage, and to be recognized in our reviewers list. You can also cite your work for the Journal of Law, Humanities and Politics (JIHHP) as part of your professional development requirements.