Analysis of the Judgment of the Judge in the Settlement of Default Agreement Debts (Case Study Decision Number 515/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Jkt.Sel)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1105Keywords:
Judge's Consideration, Default, Civil Law PrinciplesAbstract
Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Settling Defaults in Debt Agreement (Case Study of Decision Number 515/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Jkt.Sel) aims to examine how judges assess default cases and reflect relevant civil law principles. This research uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach. The results showed that in the decision, the judge considered the authentic deed of acknowledgment of debt made by the defendant as valid evidence of the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant. Although the defendant acknowledged the debt, the judge found that the defendant did not fulfill its obligation to pay, which was considered a default. The judge also emphasized the importance of good faith in the execution of the agreement, asserting that the collateral in the form of land certificates provided by the defendant did not change the fact that the obligation had not been fulfilled. Finally, the judge granted the plaintiff's claim, affirming the protection of violated rights and demonstrating a commitment to upholding justice in the legal system. This decision reflects the application of fundamental civil law principles, emphasizing the importance of authentic deeds, the definition of default, and the need to comply with agreed obligations. Through careful analysis of evidence and enforcement of creditors' rights, this decision not only resolves the dispute but also educates the public on civil law, encouraging integrity and compliance in transactions
References
Achmad, A., & Wiwie, H. (2004). Sosiologi Hukum: Kajian Empiris Terhadap Pengadilan. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit IBLAM.
Aura Imtiyaz Qatrunnada Giatmokoputri, "Bentuk Penyelesaian yang Tepat Terkait Wanprestasi Developer atas Bangunan Pre Project Selling," Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol. 12, No. 9, 2024, pp. 2107-2126, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
Ngafifi, M. (2014). Kemajuan Teknologi dan Pola Hidup Manusia dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 2(1).
Nurmayda, S. (2024). Pertanggung Jawaban Perdata bagi debitor yang wanprestasi di atas perjanjian kredit modal usaha di bank konvensional (Studi kasus putusan perkara No. 24/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Mdn). Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Medan Area.
Pengadilan Negeri Kisaran. (n.d.). Mediasi. Diambil pada 18 Oktober 2024, dari https://www.pn-kisaran.go.id/2015-06-06-01-33-28/2015-06-22-15-03-59/materi-mediasi.html
Riyanto, B., & Sekartaji, H. T. (2019). Pemberdayaan Gugatan Sederhana Perkara Perdata guna Mewujudkan Penyelenggaraan Peradilan Berdasarkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan. Masalah-masalah Hukum, 48(1), 98–110.
Soekanto, S., & Mamuji, S. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sutahar. (2024). Penyesuaian Utang-piutang melalui Gugatan Sederhana sebagai Implementasi Azas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat dan Biaya Ringan. Journal Syntax Idea, 6(1). p–ISSN: 2723-4339, e-ISSN: 2548-1398.
Tim Hukumonline. (n.d.). Pengertian Wanprestasi, Akibat, dan Penyelesaiannya. Hukumonline. Diambil dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/unsur-dan-cara-menyelesaikan-wanprestasi-lt62174878376c7/
Tiodor, P. C. (2023). Pembuktian Wanprestasi Perjanjian Utang-piutang secara Lisan. Jurnal Krisna Law, 5(1), 27. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana.
Yoliandri Nur Sharky. (2024). Akibat Hukum terjadinya Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kerja Tanpa Adanya Jaminan. Journal Syntax Idea, 6(4), 9825. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2
Yunanto, "Menerjemahkan Keadilan dalam Putusan Hakim," Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. 7, No. 2, Oktober 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shafaa Alaadini Yuan, Gunawan Djajaputra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
