Determination of Suspects Based on Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Number 6 of 2019 Concerning Criminal Investigation (Case Study Number: 10/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Bdg)

Authors

  • Robiatul Adawiyah Narotama University Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Nynda Fatmawati O Narotama University Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1115

Keywords:

Determination of Suspects, National Police Chief Regulation Number 6 of 2019, KUHAP, Ruling of the Constitutional Court Number 21/puu-xii/2014

Abstract

This research aims to find out whether the arrangements for determining suspects in National Police Chief Regulation Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigations are in accordance with the provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This research uses normative research methods with a prescriptive approach. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained from library materials, such as books, journals and statutory regulations. The results of the research show that "the beginning of evidence" in National Police Chief Regulation Number 6 of 2019 do have several differences with the provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code who have been perfected by the ruling of the constitutional court number 21 / puu-xii / 2014. that there must be 2 sufficient tools of evidence and the investigator's objective conviction to satisfy the establishment of a suspect. But, contrary to the regulations of the 6/2019 capture, there was an SPDP that contained the identity of the suspect. This would be a conflict of norms, but the stipulations of the 6/2019 capture should be consistent with the requirements of KUHAP.

References

Arfa, F. A., & Marpaung, W. (2018). Islamic Law Research Methodology: Revised Edition.

Prenada Media.

Azis, Abdul. (2021). THE VALIDITY OF THE DETERMINATION OF SUSPECTS AS AN OBJECT OF PRETRIAL IN CORRUPTION CRIMES.

Hendrastanto, Y., Suryanata, K. A., Usman, A. S., & Agus, I. (1987). Capita Selekta Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia.

Hidayat, A. (2023). LEGAL REVIEW ON PRETRIAL DETERMINATION

SUSPECTED. Paramarta Discourse: Journal of Legal Science, 22(1), 7-14.

Huzaini, Muhammad. and Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan. (2021). "The Legal Position and Function of the Chief of Police Circular Letter Number. SE/7/VII/2018 Regarding the Termination of Investigation.". Widya Yuridika Law Journal.

Imilda, Aprilianti. (2020). "Police Discretion Based on National Police Chief Regulation Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation (Case Study on Mediation of Persecution Crime at Sumenep Police Station)". Wiraraja University Journal.

Kusuma, I. M. W. W., & Karma, N. M. S. (2020). Pretrial Legal Efforts in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Journal of Legal Interpretation, 1(2), 73-77.

Mukhlis, R. (2012). The Shifting Position and Duties of Police Investigators with the Development of Offenses Outside the Criminal Code. Journal of Legal Science, 4(1).

Pradana, A. N. (2020). Legal Basis for the Public Prosecutor to File Cassation against the Verdict of Release from All Legal Charges in the Case of Embezzlement in a Continuous Position. Verstek, 5(3).

Ramadhan, R. N. (2022). Legal Certainty in the Determination of Suspects in Cases of Mutual Reporting of Persecution. Indonesian Journal of Law Enforcement, 3(1), 40-58.

Sastrosoehardjo, Soehardjo. (1997). "Syllabus of Legal Philosophy Course". Diponegoro University Graduate Law Program.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Robiatul Adawiyah, & Nynda Fatmawati O. (2024). Determination of Suspects Based on Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Number 6 of 2019 Concerning Criminal Investigation (Case Study Number: 10/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Bdg). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(2), 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1115