Juridical Review of Defamation in the Context of Domestic Violence (KDRT) Evidence Videos Uploaded on Social Media

Authors

  • Robiatul Adawiyah Narotama University Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Nynda Fatmawati O Narotama University Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1488

Keywords:

Domestic Violence (DV), Defamation, Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law)

Abstract

Social media currently plays a significant role in everyday life, facilitating the sharing of information, including sensitive issues such as Domestic Violence (DV). Uploading videos as evidence of DV is often used as an attempt to seek public support or demand justice. However, this practice poses legal risks, particularly related to defamation, especially if the identity of the affected party is revealed. In Indonesia, defamation is regulated under the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), particularly Article 27, paragraph (3), which is frequently applied in social media-related cases. The dilemma arises in balancing the victim's right to disclose their experience of violence with the perpetrator's right to protect their reputation. These cases highlight the challenges of law enforcement in the digital era, where victims often turn to social media due to a lack of trust in formal legal systems, while others may use the law to defend their reputation. Data from the Ministry of Communication and Information (Kominfo) and the National Commission on Violence Against Women (Komnas Perempuan) show an increase in such cases, indicating the need for legal revisions that are more just and responsive to technological advancements and social dynamics.

References

Alviolita, Fifink Praiseda, and Barda Nawawi Arief, ‘Kebijakan Formulasi Tentang Perumusan Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia’, Law Reform, 15.1 (2019), p. 130, doi:10.14710/lr.v15i1.23359

Amrullah, Arif Fauzan, ‘Analisis Konten Prank KDRT pada Channel YouTube Baim Wong terhadap Perilaku Masyarakat’, JIKA (Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Andalan), 5.2 (2023)

Ardiputra, Septiawan, ‘Sosialisasi UU ITE No. 19 Tahun 2016 dan Edukasi Cerdas dan Bijak dalam Bermedia Sosial’, Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2.2 (2022), pp. 707–18, doi:10.54082/jamsi.314

Asmadi, Erwin, ‘Rumusan Delik Dan Pemidanaan Bagi Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Di Media Sosial’, 6 (2020)

A., S. W. E., Sjafriani, R. (2010). Kontroversi UU ITE: menggugat pencemaran nama baik di ranah maya. Indonesia: Degraf Pub.

Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) di dalam KUHP. (2015). Indonesia: Sinar Grafika. Hutabarat, S. A., Praja, S. J., Suhariyanto, D., Paminto, S. R., Kusumastuti, D., Fajrina, R. M., ... & Abas, M. (2023). CYBER-LAW: Quo Vadis Regulasi UU ITE dalam Revolusi Industri 4.0 Menuju Era Society 5.0. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Junia, ‘Analisis Tentang Pencemaran Nama Baik dan Penyalahgunaan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat di Media Sosial’, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 3.2 (2021), pp. 261–65, doi:10.22225/ah.3.2.2021.261-265

Karenisa, Kity, ‘Penghinaan Terhadap Simbol Dan Pejabat Negara Dalam Kajian Linguistik Forensik’, TELAGA BAHASA, 7.1 (2020), pp. 55–72, doi:10.36843/tb.v7i1.57

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Pasal 310, Pasal 311Pasal 27 ayat (3) UU ITE 2008 (sebelum diubah).

Liliana, D. Y., Kom, M., Andryani, N. A. C., Priandana, K., & Fitriyah, H. (2021). Buku Literasi Informasi: Women Against Disruptive Information on Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Cempluk Aksara.

Mangkepriyanto, E. (2019). Pidana, ITE dan Perlindungan Konsumen. GUEPEDIA.

Marpaung, Leden, 2009, Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2017, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Jakarta: KENCANA).

Matinya kebebasan berpendapat: ketika para korban UU ITE bertutur. (2021). Indonesia: Parist. Artikel Ilmiah.

Mauliya, Afina, and Triana Rosalina Noor, ‘Cyber Safety dalam Merespon Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online di Masa Pandemi Covid-19’, Ad- Dariyah: Jurnal Dialektika, Sosial dan Budaya, 3.2 (2023), pp. 82–98, doi:10.55623/ad.v3i2.136

Pasal 45 ayat (3) UU ITE 2016 (setelah diubah)UU 1/2024 tentang perubahan kedua UU ITE Media Elektronik https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/memviralkan-fakta-di-medsos--bisa-kena-pasal-pencemaran-nama-baik-lt5d83b35260ae6/ Diakses 07 September 2024.

Pramana, Darmawan Nuryudha, and ’ Subekti, ‘Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Korban Online Gender-Based Violence Dalam Peraturan Perundang- Undangan Di Indonesia’, Recidive?: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 9.2 (2020), p. 161, doi:10.20961/recidive.v9i2.47405

Wibowo, Ari, ‘Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Delik Pencemaran Nama Baik di Indonesia’, 7 (2012)

Winarno, Wahyu Agus, ‘Sebuah Kajian Pada Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE)’, 1 Peraturan Perundang – undangan.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

Robiatul Adawiyah, & Nynda Fatmawati O. (2025). Juridical Review of Defamation in the Context of Domestic Violence (KDRT) Evidence Videos Uploaded on Social Media. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(4), 2325–2332. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1488