Legal Certainty for Banks in the Use of Power of Sale Related to Repossessed Assets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1251Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Power of Attorney, AYDAAbstract
Banks, as financial institutions, have an essential role in the economy, including in terms of providing credit. In the process of granting credit, collateral is one of the main elements that guarantee the debtor's ability to fulfil his obligations. One form of collateral that is often accepted is land rights, which are bound through mortgage rights based on Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. This research aims to analyze the legal certainty related to the use of the power of sale by banks in relation to AYDA (repossessed collateral), as well as examine the legal aspects that need to be considered in its implementation. The research method used is a normative juridical approach, focusing on the analysis of relevant laws and regulations and related legal principles. The result of this research is that the position of a power of attorney to sell has a vital role in resolving bad debts, primarily related to the sale of collateral objects used as collateral in credit agreements. This power of attorney must meet the legal requirements of the contract stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and can take the form of a deed under the hand or an authentic deed. Legal certainty is critical in resolving bad debts through AYDA. The power of attorney to sell benefits the Bank by facilitating the execution of collateral, but it must also be balanced with strict supervision to avoid abuse of authority. This legal certainty also protects the rights of debtors, ensuring a transparent and fair process in the sale of assets. This increases public confidence in the banking system and provides protection for both parties. This research is expected to give a clearer understanding of the legality and legal implications of the use of a power of attorney to sell in the settlement of bad debts through AYDA.
References
Ali, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Detria, R. (2018). Kepastian Hukum Objek Hak Tanggungan Yang Dikuasai Bank Dalam Pelaksanaan Agunan Yang Diambil Alih (AYDA) Lebih Dari 1 (Satu) Tahun. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Dianawati, C. B., & Purnawan, A. (2017). Kajian Hukum Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Yang Dilelang Tanpa Proses Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Ke Ketua Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Akta, 4(2).
Dilapanga, N. M. (2021). Agunan Yang Diambil Alih?: Sebuah Mekanisme Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 5(1).
Hasibuan, M. A. S. (2020). Pembuatan Kuasa Menjual Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet oleh Bank Dengan Proses Aset yang Diambil Alih (AYDA). Jurnal Retical Review, 2(1).
Julyano, M. (2019). Penerapan Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepido, 1(1).
Nasution, B. J. (2016). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Mandar Maju.
Novidianto, T., & Retnowati, T. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Untuk Kredit Yang Diambil Alih (Take Over) Dengan Pelunasan Dan Jaminan Yang Dikeluarkan Tidak Pada Hari Yang Sama. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 10(1).
Prabandari, G. A. (2021). Penyelesian Kredit Yang DIjamin Hak Tanggungan Dengan AYDA Bank Melalui Lelang. Jurnal Notarius, 14(1).
Prasetio, B. (2015). Bagaimana Bank Melakukan AYDA? Https://Www.Hukumonline.Com/.
Pratiwi, C. (2023). Mekanisme Aset Yang Diambil Alih Pada Fasilitas Kredit Pemilikan Rumah PT Bank X. Jurnal Unes Law Review, 6(2).
Rahmadinata, Y. (2022). Pengalihan Piutang Secara Cessie Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Kredit dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Jaminan Hutang Debitur. Recital Review, 4(1), 25–61.
Salim, H. (2008). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Setyawan, A. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Penggunaan Surat Kuasa Jual Terhadap Penjualan Objek Hak Tanggungan Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet. Jurnal Selat, 4(1).
Siringoringo, R. (2012). Karakteristik dan Fungsi Intermediasi Perbankan di Indonesia. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 15(1).
Subekti, R. (2018). Aneka Perjanjian. Citra Aditya.
Suyanto, A. (2016). Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Melalui Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Tanpa Proses Gugatan Pengadilan. Prenadamedia Group.
Syamza, R. R., Yuhelson, & Tondy, C. J. (2023). Eksistensi Kuasa Menjual Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Debitur Macet Melalui Proses Ayda (Aset Yang Diambil Alih Oleh Bank). Sentri: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(7).
Tarigan, Y. P., Thaib, H., Maharani, U., & Zamakhsyari. (2023). Penyelesaian pembiayaan bermasalah pada Bank Syariah dengan mekanisme agunan yang diambil alih (AYDA) (Studi Kasus: PT Coffindo dan Bank Muamalat Cabang Medan Sudirman). Jurnal Normatif, 3(1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gneissa Beltsazar, Nun Harrieti, Agus Suwandono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
