Juridical Analysis of the Judge'S Decision in the Narcotics Courier Case (Study of Decision Number 28/Pid. Sus/2025/Pn Sng)

Authors

  • Ajeng Safitri Mudriyani Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Sartika Dewi Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Abas Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.2004

Keywords:

Drug Crimes, Couriers, Legal Analysis

Abstract

Law enforcement against narcotics crimes in Indonesia is a complex and crucial issue, especially for perpetrators who act as drug couriers. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations used by judges in sentencing narcotics courier fraudsters, focusing on Decision Number 28/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Sng. Based on the results of a survey by the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), an average of 50 people die each year due to drugs. This means that around 18,000 people die per year from smoking. The approach used is normative juridical, by examining laws and regulations, legal literature, and court decisions. This study is descriptive qualitative in nature, aiming to provide an understanding of the application of Article 114 Paragraph (2) of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics in judicial practice. The results of the study show that in sentencing, judges consider various aspects, such as the role of fraudsters in the narcotics distribution network, the amount of evidence, and cooperative attitudes in selling narcotics. Although the legal provisions regulate severe sanctions against perpetrators of drug trafficking, there is still room for judges to proportionally assess the role of couriers in a crime. This analysis is expected to contribute to the development of criminal law, especially in creating a fair and effective justice system in members of drug crimes

References

Anang Iskandar, Narcotics Law Enforcement (Jakarta: Elek Media Komputindo, 2019) p. 3

Johnny Ibrahim, Theory and Methodology of Normative Law Research (Malang: Bayu Media Publishing, 2006), 306.

Lysa Angrayni and Yusliati, The Effectiveness of Narcotics Addict Rehabilitation and Its Effect on the Crime Rate in Indonesia, Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia, Ponorogo, 2018, p.53.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Legal Research (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2010), 133.

Soedjono Dirdjosisworo, Indonesian Narcotics Law, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung 1990, p. 3.

Yulianto Achmad and Mukti Fajar, Dualism of Normative & Empirical Law Research (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Siswa, 2010), 34.

Zainab Ompu Jainah, Drug Crime as a Phenomenon of Transnational Organized Crime Legal Institutions Volume 8 No. 2 of 2013, p. 102.

Article 1 number 1 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.

Khalsa, J. H. (2007). Medical and Health Consequences of Marijuana

hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt52f93ee68a431/perlindungan-hukum-bagi children who are used as couriers-narcotics accessed on May 12, 2025, at 9:49 p.m.

Narcotics (n) in the Great Dictionary of the Indonesian Language (KBBI Online). Accessed via https://kbbi.web.id/kurir

Soyka, M., Apelt, S., Lieb, M., & Wittchen, H.-U. (2006). One-year mortality rates of patients receiving methadone and buprenorphine maintenance therapy: a nationally representative cohort study in 2694 patients. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

How to Cite

Safitri Mudriyani, A., Dewi, S., & Abas, M. (2025). Juridical Analysis of the Judge’S Decision in the Narcotics Courier Case (Study of Decision Number 28/Pid. Sus/2025/Pn Sng). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(5), 4133–4140. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.2004

Most read articles by the same author(s)