Juridical Analysis of the Position of Actors "Participating in Carrying Out" in the Distribution of Illegal Drugs Based on Law Number 36 of 2009 Regarding Health (Study Decision Number 210/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Kwg)

Authors

  • Nadia Syahida Faculty of Law, Buana Perjuangan University, Indonesia
  • Deny Guntara Faculty of Law, Buana Perjuangan University, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Abas Faculty of Law, Buana Perjuangan University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.399

Keywords:

Criminal Inclusion; Preparation Pharmacy; Drugs

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the regulations regarding Medeplegen's participation in Indonesian criminal law and to analyze criminal penalties for perpetrators of participation in the distribution of pharmaceutical preparations of illegal drugs. illegal in District Court Decision Karawang Number 210/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Kwg. Indonesia is a legal country that prohibits the circulation of pharmaceutical preparations or drugs forbidden without permission especially drugs the enter into the Psychotropic and Narcotics categories. But in reality, there are many distributors of pharmaceutical preparations in the form of drugs classified as psychotropics and narcotics without permits or illegally. Most of them do it not alone but in collaboration. This is included in the act of participation (Delneming), and then the party participating is called Medeplegen, as is the case in Decision Number 210/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Kwg. Qualitative and normative legal approaches are used as research methods taken from literature or material obtained from library research, and research specifications use analytical descriptive. The results of the research are: (1) That the distribution of pharmaceutical preparations with inclusions violates Article 197 of Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, "taking part" or "participation" (Medeplegen) is regulated in Article 55 of the Criminal Code, and in terms of the element " inclusion” namely in the form of conscious cooperation (bewuste samenwerking). (2) There is a difference between the application of the law and the reality of the verdict in Decision Number 210/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Kwg, where the amount of the fine is less than that stated in Article 197 of the Health Law, but the author sees and appreciates the considerations The Panel of Judges and pay attention to considerations regarding mitigating circumstances for the Defendant.

References

Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana; Bagian 2 (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014), 29.

Anton Sudanto, Penerapan Hukum Pidana Narkotika Di Indonesia (Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945), 139.

M. Hollyone N Singadimedja, Oci Senjaya dan Margo Hadipura, Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Jakarta: Adhi Sarana Nusantara Media, 2019), 163.

R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Bogor: Poilteia, 1993), 73.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika.

Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.

Peraturan Kepala Badan Pengawas Obat Dan Makanan Nomor 7 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Obat-Obat Tertentu Yang Sering Disalahgunakan.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Karawang Nomor 210/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Kwg.

Andi Rahmah, Nurmiati dan Nur Fahmi, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Sediaan Farmasi (Obat) Secara Ilegal Di Kota Makassar (Studi Putusan 1670/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks)”. Pledoi 1 No. 2 (2023): 77.

Muhammad Satrio Natigor Utomo dan Sulistyanta, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika Dengan Rehabilitasi Dan Putusan Pidana Penjara (Studi Kasus Putusan PN Yogyakarta)”. Recidive 11 No. 3 (2022): 259.

R. Gunawan & N. Serikat, “Tindak Pidana Narkotika Sebagai Transnational Organized Crime”. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 1 No. 3 (Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2019).

Siti Hidayatun, Widyawaty dan Yeni, “Konsep Rehabilitasi Bagi Pengguna Narkotika Yang Berkeadilan”. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan 1 No. 2 (Yogyakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 2020): 18.

Alian Setiawan, “Perbandingan Efektifitas Antara Ketamin Dengan Tramadol Untuk Mengurangi Akibat Penyuntikan Rocuronium”. Skripsi (Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2010): 6.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-04

How to Cite

Syahida, N., Guntara, D., & Abas, M. (2024). Juridical Analysis of the Position of Actors "Participating in Carrying Out" in the Distribution of Illegal Drugs Based on Law Number 36 of 2009 Regarding Health (Study Decision Number 210/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Kwg). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(4), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.399