The Effectiveness of Resolving Money Laundering Cases from Predicate Crime Customs Crimes with Cumulative Indictments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.2036Keywords:
Indictment, Cumulative, Customs, Money LaunderingAbstract
Corresponding Author: Customs crimes have become increasingly prevalent in Indonesia and have caused significant losses to the state. An effective approach to address this issue is by combining them with money laundering offenses through cumulative charges. The objective of this research is to examine the effectiveness of resolving customs and money laundering cases using cumulative charges. This study adopted a normative juridical method, utilizing the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. The research relied on secondary data, which included primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The data were analyzed using a descriptive analysis method. The results of this study showed that, in handling customs crime and money laundering cases, it is more appropriate to use cumulative indictments because this provides several advantages, including establishing customs crime as a predicate crime, recovering state losses, and ensuring effectiveness and efficiency in case resolution in court following the principles of uncomplicated, timely, and affordable justice. This was evidenced by Decision Number 580/Pid.B/2022/PN Btm, which applied cumulative indictments and in which the judge declared the defendant guilty of smuggling and money laundering
References
Aditya Subur Purwana & Hari Kusuma Setia Negara. (2023). Analisis Tipologi Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Kepabeanan. Jurnal Perspektif Bea dan Cukai, Vol. 7, No. 1, 131-146.
Aditya Subur Purwana & Hari Kusuma Setia Negara. (2023). Analisi Tipologi Tindak Pidana di Bidang Kepabeanan. Jurnal Prespektif Bea dan Cukai, Volume 7(Nomor 1), 131-146.
Agus Riyanto. (2019, Desember).Jurisdiction Of The Function Of The Indictment Letter In Proses Criminal Act Examination In Court. Petita, Vol. 1 No. 2, 196-215.
A. Karim Nasution. (1981). Masalah Surat Tuduhan Dalam Proses Pidana. Pantjuran Tujuh,.
Amin Suhaemin, Muslih & , Moch. Fahmi Firmansyah. (2024). Predicate Offence Dan Derifative Crime Sebagai Suatu Splitsing Case Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Dilakukan Oleh Korporasi. EduLaw : Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence, Volume 6 Nomor 1, 1-11.
Arifin Zulkarnain, Anatomi Muliawan. (2021). Analisa Yuridis Penerapan Tipikor Dan Tppu Dalam Rangka Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 130/Pid.Sus/Tpk/2017/PN.Jkt.Pst. JCA of LAW, Vol. 2 No. 1, 10-19.
Aulia Arif Nasution*1 , Sunarmi , Mahmud Mulyadi , Muhammad Ekaputra. (2019, Oktober). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Sebagai Alat Untuk Mencari “Beneficial Owner” Dalam Perkara Asal Kepabeanan dan Cukai. Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues, Vol.02, No.01, 403-408.
Bambang, W. (1996). Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
DJBC dan PPATK. (2022). Penilaian Risiko Pencucian Uang Sektor Kepabeanan dan Cukai. DJBC dan PPATK.
Dony Tarmizi. (2022, Mei). Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perbarengan Perbuatan. Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perbarengan Perbuatan Pidana (Concursus Realis), Volume 1 Nomor 1, 69-105.
Ginting, Y. P. (2021, Desember). Pemberantasan Pencucian Uang dengan Pendekatan Follow the Money dan Follow the Suspect. Mulawarman Law Review, Volume 6 Issue 2, 105-114.
Hamzah, A. (2022). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Edisi ke-2 ed.). Sinar Grafika.
Harviyani, S. A. (2021, September - Desember). Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan Untuk Mewujudkan Acces To Justice. Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 9 No. 3, 650-657.
Hidayat, R. (2022, September 29). Alasan Kejaksaan Gabungkan Dua Tindak Pidana Sambo dalam Satu Surat Dakwaan. Hukum Online. Retrieved may 20, 2025, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/alasan-kejaksaan-gabungkan-dua-tindak-pidana-sambo-dalam-satu-surat-dakwaan-lt63351ac3960dd/
Hidayat, W. (2022, Februari). Strategi Dan Cara Penyelesaian Pencegahan Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU). Sintaksis : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, Vol 2 No 1, 70-77.
H.S Brahmana. (2023, April 17). Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Pengadilan Negeri Lhoksukon. Retrieved May 220, 2025, from https://www.pn-lhoksukon.go.id/content/artikel/20170417150853209334910258f4781588e77.html#tabs%7CTabs_Group_name:tabLampiran
Ilham, M. H. (2019). Kajian Atas Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, dan Biaya Ringan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Pencari Keadilan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 246 K/Pid/2017). Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 7 No. 3, 212-219.
Ilona Estherina. (2024, November 14). Sri Mulyani Beberkan Modus dalam Transaksi Ilegal di Kepabeanan, Negara Rugi hingga Rp 41 Triliun | tempo.co. Tempo.co. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/sri-mulyani-beberkan-modus-dalam-transaksi-ilegal-di-kepabeanan-negara-rugi-hingga-rp-41-triliun-1168156
Kemenkeu RI. (2025, January 6). Kinerja Pendapatan Negara Tahun 2024 Tumbuh Positif. Kementerian Keuangan. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/berita-utama/Pendapatan-Negara-Tahun-2024-Tumbuh-Positif
Kemenkeu RI DJBC. (2024, November 14). Bea Cukai Tindak 31.275 Perdagangan Ilegal di 2024, Menkeu Sri Mulyani: Potensi Kerugian Negara Rp3,9 Triliun. Kementerian Keuangan. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/berita-utama/Bea-Cukai-Tindak-31-275-Perdagangan-Ilegal-di-2024
THE LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF PROSECUTION. (2023, April). The Prosecutor Law Review, Volume 1, No. 1, 1-36.
Marco Parasian Tambunan. (2016, Januari – Juni ,). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Mimbar Keadilan, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 100 – 113.
Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi ed.). KENCANA.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. PT Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Noverdi Puja Saputra & Marfuatul Latifah. (2020, Agustus). Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Kepabeanan. Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI, Vol. XII, No.15, 1-5.
Nurul Fahirah, Suwitno Yutye Imran, Waode Mustika & Nurul Fazri Elfikri. (2024, Maret). Upaya Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kasus Peredaran Hasil Tembakau Ilegal Oleh Aparat Bea Dan Cukai Gorontalo. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora, Vol. 1 No. 1, 01-10.
Pardosi Donnia , Hulman Panjaitan & Armunanto Hutahaean. (2023). Efektifitas Penegakan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Hasil Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, Volume 3 Nomor 5, Pardosi Donnia, Hulman Panjaitan , Armunanto Hutahaean.
Realisasi Penerimaan Bea Cukai Tembus Rp52,6 Triliun. (2025, March 19). Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai. Retrieved may 20, 2025, from https://www.beacukai.go.id/berita/realisasi-penerimaan-bea-cukai-tembus-rp52-6-triliun-.html
Rodrigo F. Elias & Nurhikmah Nachrawy. (2021). Konsep Perbarengan Tindak Pidana Pada (Concurcus) Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana . Lex Crimen, Vol. X/No. 5, 190-198.
ROZI, F. (2018, Desember). Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses Persidangan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Yuridis Unaja, VOL 1 NO 2, 19-33.
Ruslan Renggong. (2017). Hukum Pidana Khusus (Edisi Pertama ed.). Kencana.
Saragi, M. M. (2012, March 29). Bentuk-bentuk Surat Dakwaan | Klinik Hukumonline. Hukumonline. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/bentuk-bentuk-surat-dakwaan-lt4f4c5a4ea3527/
Siregar, D. C. (2025, Maret). Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika melalui Penerapan Rezim Anti Money laundering. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, Vol.5, No.1, 41-52.
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji. (1942). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.
Supriyadi Widodo Eddyono Yonatan Iskandar Chandra. (Oktober 2015). Mengurai Implementasi dan Tantangan Anti-Pencucian Uang di Indonesia. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.
Vonny A. Wongkar & Herlyanty Y. A Bawole. (2021, Maret). Syarat Materil Surat Dakwaan Menurut Pandangan Doktrin Serta Praktik Peradilan Pidana. Lex Crimen, Vol. X/No. 2/, 140-150.
Waluyo, B. (2024). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Tindak Pidana Khusus. Sinar Grafika.
Yanuar, M. A. (2019, Desember). Discourse between Positions of Money Laundering Offences as a Independent Crime and as a Follow Up Crime After The Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 90/PUU-XIII/2015. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 16(Nomor 4), 722-739.
Yenti Garnasih. (2017). Pencegahan Hukum Anti-Pencucian Uang dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia (Edisi 1 ed.). Rajawali Pers, Depok.
Yonatan Iskandar Chandra Siradj Okta. (2016). Kedudukan Tindak Pidana Asal (Predicate Crime) Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Universitas Atma Jaya, 154-169.
Yudha Bagus Tunggala Putra. (2024, Desember). Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Rechtens, Vol. 13, No., 181-198.
Yunus Husein & Roberts K. (2018). Tipologi dan Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Edisi 1 ed.). Rajawali Pers
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fadzal Mutaqin, Bambang Waluyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
