Evocation of Trade Disputes Through Arbitration of The World Trade Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2167Keywords:
Evocation, Dispute, Business, International.Abstract
Arbitration is an independent, final and binding mechanism for resolving international commercial disputes within the framework of the WTO. There are two major international agreements on arbitration, namely the New York Convention and the ICSD Convention/Washington, which contains provisions in the form of "the law of arbitration”. Arbitration concerns several things, including party autonomy, competence, legal obligations, good ethics, efficiency, audit and modification, privacy and confidentiality, separation, limitation of judicial involvement, venue, and fair and impartial treatment. The advantages of arbitration include fast resolution, confidentiality, and freedom to choose arbitrators. However, there are also disadvantages that must be considered. For example, if the parties do not fulfill the requirements of the good faith rule, then the arbitral award will lose full legal force and effect. Therefore, the selection of arbitration as a method of dispute resolution must be done carefully by considering all relevant aspects and principles.
References
(WTO), W. T. O. (2020). Annual Report on the Dispute Settlement Body. WTO Publications.
Abdurrasyid, P. (2002). Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa?: Suatu Pengantar. Fikahati Aneska.
Adolf, H. (1996). Pengantar Hukum Ekonomi Internasional. Rajawali Pers.
Adolf, H. (2012). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Rajawali Pers.
Agnes, M. T. (1995). Arbitrase Di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Amriani, N. (2012). Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Aprita, S., & Adhitya, R. (2020). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Asyhadie, Z. (2009). Hukum Bisnis. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Bown, C. P., & Hillman, J. A. (2019). WTO’s Dispute Settlement Crisis: What’s at Stake?
D, M. A. (2013). A Legal Principle of Special and Differential Treatment for WTO Disputes. Cambridge University Press.
Elsig, M., Pollack, M. A., & Shaffer, G. (2021). The Crisis of the WTO Appellate Body: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions. Journal of International Economic Law, 24(1), 1–20.
Erskine, D. H. (2003). Resolving Trade Disputes: The Mechanisms of GATT/WTO Dispute Resolution. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 2(1), 40–83.
GUPTA, R. N. (2021). Distributive justice in international trade. Global Trade Journal, 9(2), 77–92.
Herlina. (2007). “Dispute Settlement Under The World Trade Organization: Inequality Protection Between Developed and Developing Countries”, Voices Frim Asia: For a Just and Equitable World.
Ilsan, A. (1992). Kompendium Tentang Arbitrase Perdagangan Internasional. Pradnya Paramita.
Lawrence, I. A. (2020). The principle of pacta sunt servanda in international law. International Law Review, 221(1), 27–44.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ ARMIA. (2022). PENENTUAN METODE & PENDEKATAN PENELITIAN HUKUM. LEMBAGA KAJIAN KONSTITUSI INDONESIA (LKKI).
Pauwelyn, J. (2022). WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect from the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA)? World Trade Review, 21(2), 245–260.
Raj, B. (2008). International Trade Law: Interdisciplinary Theory and Practice. Matthew Bender & Company.
Santoso, A. P. A., Rifai, A., Wijayanti, E., & Prastyanti, R. A. (2022). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PUSTAKA BARU PRESS.
Shaffer, G., Elsig, M., & Puig, S. (2021). The Slow Transformation of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement System. American Journal of International Law, 115(3), 425–470.
Simatupang, R. B. (2003). Aspek Hukum Dalam Bisnis. Rineka Cipta.
Smith, J. (2021). The impact of US-China trade relations. World Trade Review, 15(1), 1–18.
Solikhin, R. (2023). Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasional Dalam Kerangka WTO: Mekanisme, Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Putusan Dan Tindakan Retaliasi Sebagai Upaya Pemulihan Hak. Padjadjaran Law Review, 11(1), 116–129.
Sovi, S. N., Hasbullah, A. R., Ardiyan, A. M., Setiawan, Rachmatulloh, M. A., Rais, P., Rizal, M. C., Zahro’, F., Dermawan, R., Widodo, M. F. S., Qamaria, R. S., & Kamil, H. (2021). RAGAM METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM. Lembaga Studi Hukum Pidana.
Stoll, P.-T., & Fchorkopf, F. (2006). WTO: World Economic Order, World Trade Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mas Rara Tri Retno Herryani, Iklima Nur Rahma, Mohammad Haris Yusuf Albar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
