Application of the Lex Favor Reo Principle to the Offense of Child Grooming under the National Criminal Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3676Keywords:
Asas Lex Favor Reo, Child Grooming, Normative Gap, Digital Sexual CrimesAbstract
This research is motivated by developments in national criminal law following the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code, which establishes the lex favor reo principle in Article 3. This principle mandates the application of the law most favorable to the defendant in the event of changes to legislation. Meanwhile, the rise of digital sexual crimes specifically child grooming presents a legal issue, as the act is not explicitly regulated in the National Criminal Code. This situation creates a dilemma between protecting the defendant's rights via the principle of legality and the need to protect children from digital sexual exploitation. Accordingly, this research addresses two issues: (1) the regulation of the lex favor reo principle within the National Criminal Code, and (2) the application of the lex favor reo principle to the crime of child grooming under the National Criminal Code. The study employs a normative-juridical research method, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. Legal materials include primary sources (legislation), secondary sources (legal books and journals), and supporting tertiary sources. The findings indicate that the lex favor reo principle in the National Criminal Code serves as a safeguard for human rights and substantive justice, requiring the application of the most lenient law to the defendant. However, applying this principle to child grooming reveals a normative gap, as child grooming is not explicitly defined as a specific criminal offense. Therefore, a reformulation of national criminal law is required one that is more adaptive to the evolution of digital sexual crimes to ensure legal certainty while providing maximum protection for children.
References
Andi Hamzah. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.
Andi Hamzah. Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) di Dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Becker, Howard S. “Labeling Theory Reconsidered.” Dalam Deviance and Social Control, disunting oleh Paul Rock dan Mary McIntosh, 41–66. London: Tavistock Publications, 1974.
Gultom, Maidin. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2010.
Gultom, Maidin. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2014.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Lemert, Edwin M. “Primary and Secondary Deviance.” Dalam Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behavior, 75–110. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1951. Marlina. Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017. Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2010.
Saraswati, Rika. Hukum Perlindungan Anak di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.
Sedarmayanti dan Syarifudin Hidayat. Metodologi Penelitian. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.
Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1985.
Sudarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2013.
UNICEF. The Best Interest of the Child. New York: UNICEF, 2008.
Wahyudi, Setya. Implementasi Ide Diversi dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2011.
Wahyudi, Setya. Implementasi Ide Diversi dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2011.
Waluyo, Bambang. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1996.
Wiyono, R. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945;
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak;
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak;
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia;
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana;
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2026 tentang Penyesuaian Pidana;
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak;
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 Tahun 2015 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dan Penanganan Anak yang Belum Berumur 12 (Dua Belas) Tahun;
Convention on the Rights of the Child (Konvensi Hak Anak) yang telah diratifikasi melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 1990;
Aji, W. S. “The Implementation of Diversion and Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 4, no. 1 (2019): 73. ht t ps://d oi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i01.23339.
Candra, S. A. C. S. A., R. Rodliyah, dan L. Parman. “The Best Interest of The Child Principle in The Juvenile Justice System.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 4 (2019): 490. ht t ps://d oi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i4.1017.
Elvina, Putri Ayu, dan Pujiyono. “The Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System of Children.” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 6, no. 4 (2023): 597–603. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i4.1198.
Hafrida. “Restorative Justice in Juvenile Justice to Formulate Integrated Child Criminal Court.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 8, no. 3 (2019): 439–457. https://d oi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.439-457.
Heriyanto, A., E. O. Hermansyah, dan D. Atmoko. “Legal Protection for Children in the Crime of Theft.” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 6, no. 1 (2022): 137. https://d oi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v6i1.21546.
Hirohito, A., S. Saefullah, dan M. Mardani. “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana.” VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas 4, no. 3 (2024): 2240–2252. https://d oi.org/10.47467/visa.v4i3.3968.
Iman, C. H. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perlindungan Anak dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 2, no. 3 (2013): 358–378. https://d oi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.3.2013.358-378.
JILS. “JILS V olume 4 Issue 1, May 2019.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 4, no. 1 (2019). ht t ps://d oi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i01.30206.
Maharani, F. “Challenges in Implementing Diversion for Child Offenders: A Case Study of the Malang Police Department.” Jurnal Legalitas 18, no. 1 (2025): 53. ht t ps://d oi.org/10.33756/jelt a.v18i1.27692.
Maulani, E., S. Sunardi, dan M. S. A. Muhibbin. “Kebijakan Diversi dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian yang Dilakukan oleh Anak untuk Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Anak.” Jurnal Mercatoria 16, no. 2 (2023): 139. ht t ps://d oi.org/10.31289/mercat oria.v16i2.10499.
Negara, A. S. “Diversion as a Crime Solution Towards Child Crime Perpetrator.” Ius Poenale 2, no. 1 (2021): 21. https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v2i1.2204.
Nurqalbi, V. “Analysis of Diversion Arrangements in the Beijing Rules and the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia.” European Journal of Law and Political Science 2, no. 1 (2023): 52. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.1.53.
Pujiani, R. S., M. A. Aksan, dan M. Sinta. “Seeking Justice for Indonesian Children: The Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia in the Context of Criminal Justice Reform.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 4, no. 2 (2022): 259. ht t ps://d oi.org/10.15294/ijals.v4i2.60033.
Putri, A. N., dan R. Setiawan. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak dalam Tindak Pidana 40 Kekerasan Seksual: Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Perlindungan Anak.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesia 8, no. 2: 145–160.
Rahman, F. “Contextualizing Restorative Justice through Diversion Mechanism: A Study of Ind onesia Juvenile Justice System.” Indonesia Law Review 9, no. 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v9n3.584.
Rismana, D., A. Maskur, R. M. L. F. Permonoputri, H. Hariyanto, dan H. S. S. Hariz. “The Legal Effectiveness of Juvenile Diversion: A Study of the Indonesian Juvenile Justice System.” Khazanah Hukum 7, no. 2 (2025): 190. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i2.44162.
Rizal, M., H. Tuasikal, dan A. S. R. S. Rakia. “Implementasi Diversi dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Anak di Wilayah Hukum Kabupaten Sorong.” Justitia Jurnal Hukum 8, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v8i1.22468.
Sa’bani, K., dan E. A. Zulfa. “Optimizing the Role of Correctional Institution in Resolving Cases Through Diversion at the Class I Correctional Institution of Tangerang.” Legal Brief 12, no. 1 (2023): 36. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i1.722.
Sarwadi, S., dan B. T. Bawono. “Restorative Justice Approach in Diversion System for Settlement of Criminal Cases for Children in Indonesia.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 3, no. 4 (2021): 396. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v3i4.13145.
Suardi, S., dan Y. Surya. “Penerapan Diversi terhadap Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan Secara Bersama-sama (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan Nomor: 6/PID.SUS-ANAK/2017/PT.MDN).” IBLAM Law Review 1, no. 2 (2021): 140. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v1i2.31.
Sudarwin, S. “The Diversion for Children Who are Doing Crime of Theft.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 11, no. 2 (2020): 152. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i2.a15108.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alex Julius Ananda Tambunan, Tahegga Primananda Alfath
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
