A Legal Analysis of Constitutional Court Ruling Decision Number 195/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the Affirmation of Direct Popular Elections for Regional Heads from the Perspective of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Authors

  • Juanda Juanda Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta
  • Ogiandhafiz Juanda Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3690

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, regional head election, democracy, popular sovereignty, 1945 constitution of the republic of indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning and constitutional implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 195/PUU-XXIV/2026 concerning the judicial review of Article 1 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 2015 on the Election of Governors, Regents, and Mayors, as last amended by Law Number 6 of 2020. The petition was submitted on the grounds that the phrase "directly" created legal uncertainty and potentially allowed the regional head election mechanism to be shifted to representative institutions. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials consist of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, statutory regulations, Constitutional Court Decision Number 195/PUU-XXIV/2026, and relevant legal literature and scientific journals. The findings indicate that the Constitutional Court declared the petition inadmissible because the petitioners failed to satisfy the legal standing requirements under the Constitutional Court procedural law. Nevertheless, the Court's legal considerations reaffirm the importance of popular sovereignty, constitutional democracy, and legal certainty in the regional head election system. The decision strengthens the understanding that regional heads must continue to be elected directly by the people in accordance with Article 1 paragraph (2) and Article 18 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution. This study concludes that the Constitutional Court's decision plays a significant role in preserving the consistency of local democracy, ensuring legal certainty regarding the regional election system, and reinforcing the principles of a democratic state governed by the rule of law in Indonesia

References

A. Books

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Huda, Ni'matul. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2019.

Isra, Saldi. Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Isra, Saldi. Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

B. Journals

Ansori. "Legalitas Hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah dalam Menyelenggarakan Pilkada." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2017.

Arizona, Yance. "Demokrasi Konstitusional dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2020.

Fahmi, Khairul. "Pergeseran Pembatasan Hak Pilih dalam Regulasi Pemilu dan Pilkada." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2017.

Lisma, dan Lita Tyesta A.L.W. "Implikasi Partisipasi Masyarakat pada Pilkada Serentak dalam Meningkatkan Demokrasi Konstitusional di Indonesia (Studi terhadap Pelaksanaan Pilkada Serentak di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan Tahun 2015)." Law Reform, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2017.

Prasetyo, Yogi. "The Stringent Support Requirements for Independent Candidates in Regional Elections: A Legal Self-Critique of Indonesian Democracy." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2024.

Pratama, Muhammad Rezky. "Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah: Analisis Kedudukan Hukum Pemantau Pemilihan sebagai Pemohon." Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023.

Putri, Intan Permata, dan Mohammad Mahrus Ali. "Karakteristik Judicial Order dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Amar Tidak Dapat Diterima." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2019.

Seran, Gotfridus Goris. "Konstitusionalitas dan Desain Pemilukada Langsung Serentak Nasional." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2019.

Simamora, Janpatar. "Perlindungan Hak Memilih sebagai Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara." Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013.

Simamora, Janpatar, dan Bintang M.E. Naibaho. "Strengthening of Legal Foundation of the Prosecutor's Office in the Constitutional System of the Republic of Indonesia." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2025.

C. Legislations

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Wali Kota menjadi Undang-Undang.

Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 menjadi Undang-Undang.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.

D. Constitutional Court Rulings

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 006/PUU-III/2005.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 195/PUU-XXIV/2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10

How to Cite

Juanda, J., & Juanda, O. (2026). A Legal Analysis of Constitutional Court Ruling Decision Number 195/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the Affirmation of Direct Popular Elections for Regional Heads from the Perspective of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(5), 4209–4219. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3690