The Legal Position of Foso and Boboso Customary Criminal Sanctions within the Framework of the National Criminal Code in the Jurisdiction of the Sultanate of Ternate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3705Keywords:
Customary Criminal Sanctions, Foso, Boboso, National Criminal Code, Ternate SultanateAbstract
Foso and Boboso have functional customary legal force within the scope of the Ternate customary community as informal law (living law) to maintain the order of the Ternate customary community, North Maluku. This study analyzes: (1) the legal position of the customary criminal sanctions of foso and boboso in the Se Atorang customary tradition in the Ternate Sultanate of North Maluku and (2) the prospects and challenges of transforming customary criminal law as additional punishment in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code in the Ternate Sultanate of North Maluku. The research method used in this study is an empirical legal research method with a live case study approach. The results of the study indicate that the origin of Article 66 paragraph (1) letter f provides recognition of customary sanctions against perpetrators of criminal acts. However, there are problems in its application. This is because customary criminal sanctions, known in Ternate customary law as "Foso se Boboso," are based on the Adat se-Atorang philosophy and the principle of the relationship between the Sultan and the People, which prioritizes the implementation of the "Ngofa se Nyeku" custom. Violations of norms, ethics, etiquette (politeness), and customary law by ngofa se nyeku members will be subject to tiered customary sanctions. Initial sanctions include stern warnings, advice, or guidance from traditional elders or the customary council (fala raha) or spiritual leaders (sowohi) within the customary structure of the sultanate in North Maluku.
References
Abdulrahman, M. J. (2001). Ternate bandar jalur sutera (A. Kamaluddin, Ed.). Ternate: Lembaga Informasi dan Transformasi Sosial. Retrieved from https://file-opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=933066
Absori, A., Nurhayati, N., Bangsawan, M., Budiono, A., Achmadi, A., & Nugroho, H. S. W. (2020). Green and Health Constitution of Green Open Space and Its Implementation in Surakarta. Journal of Global Pharma Technology, 12(9), 70–74. Retrieved from http://repo.poltekkesdepkes-sby.ac.id/2422/
Alhadar, F., & Tawari, R. S. (2017). FOSO dan BOBOSO: Ikhtiar Masyarakat Ternate Merawat Peradaban. Etnohistori, IV(1), 1–21. Retrieved from https://share.google/XLndSQgtIQTz3UKyi
Alting, H. (2010). Dinamika Hukum Dalam Pengakuan Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Atas Tanah (Masa Lalu, Kini, Dan Masa Mendatang). Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo. Retrieved from https://www.pustakaagraria.or.id/2022/03/dinamika-hukum-dalam-pengakuan-dan.html
Alwan, S., Arsad, J. H., Alauddin, R., Faisal, Laha, F., & Umarsangaji, A. (2022). Legal Considerations from Judges in Supreme Court Decree No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 Concerning the Acquittal of Exhibitionism Perpetrators and Their Implications as a Jurisprudence. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 12(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1401
Amal, A. (2006). Maluku Utara Perjalanan Sejarah 1250-1800 (T. A. Amal, Ed.). Ternate: Universitas Khairun Ternata Bekerja Sama Dengan Pemda Kabupaten Malut Dan Pemerintah Kota Ternate.
Amri, A. I., & Anggono, B. D. (2024). Implementasi Asas Equality Before The Law (Sebuah Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Negara Lain). Al-Syakhsiyyah Journal of Law & Family Studies, 5(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v5i2.7
Aprilianti, & Kasmawati. (2022). Hukum Adat di Indonesia. Bandar Lampung: Pusaka Media.
Arafat, M. (2025). Paradigma Pemidanaan Baru dalam KUHP 2023: Alternatif Sanksi dan Transformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v2i1.1047
Assegaf, R. S. (2023). KUHP Baru Tidak (Jadi) Melanggar Asas Legalitas. Retrieved July 1, 2026, from Hukum Online website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kuhp-baru-tidak-jadi-melanggar-asas-legalitas-lt64191772e84de/?page=3
Asyhari, M. (2008). Status Tanah–Tanah Kesultanan Ternate Dalam Perspektif Tanah Nasional. Mimbar Hukum, 20(2), 353–354.
Budiono, A., Yuspin, W., Nurani, S. S., Fairuzzaman, F., Pradnyawan, S. W. A., & Sari, S. D. (2023). The Anglo-Saxon System of Common Law and the Development of the Legal System in Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 22, 207–213. https://doi.org/10.37394/23202.2023.22.21
Bukido, R. (2017). Hukum Adat. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Customary Community of Ternate Sultanate. Peraturan Daerah Kota Ternate Nomor 13 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan Hak-Hak Adat Dan Budaya Masyarakat Adat Kesultanan Ternate. , (2009). Indonesia.
Djafar, I. A. (2005). Dari Maloku Kie Raba Hingga Negara Federal: Biografi Politik Sultan Ternate Iskandar Muhammmad Djafar Sjah. Bio Pustaka: Yogyakarta.
Fadilla, A. N., Kusumajakti, D. A. N., & Fauzi, R. M. (2024). Analisis Pengaturan Living Law dalam RUU KUHP yang Dituangkan pada Peraturan Daerah Ditinjau Berdasarkan Konstitusi. Jurist-Diction, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v7i2.56121
Faisal, F., & Ogli, T. M. A. P. (2025). Judicial Reasoning on Criminal Sanctions in Court Decision: Comparation between Indonesia and Uzbekistan. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 15(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v15i2.13649
Handayani, T. A., & Prabowo, A. (2024). Analisis hukum pidana adat dalam hukum pidana nasional. Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum, 5(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v5i1.95
Harahap, A. (2018). Pembaharuan hukum pidana berbasis hukum adat. Edutech, 4(2), 1–9. Retrieved from https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/edutech/article/view/2268
Hasim, R. (2018). Sultan dalam Sejarah Politik Ternate 1945-2002 (S. Abdulajid, Ed.). Ternate: LepKhair.
Hasim, R. (2019). Masyarakat dan Kebudayaan Ternate dalam Perspektif Sejarah. GeoCivic Jurnal, 2(2), 218.
Latifah, M., & Hairi, P. J. (2025). Pengaturan Pedoman Pemidanaan KUHP Baru dan Implikasinya pada Putusan Hakim. Negara Hukum Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v15i2.4573
Miers, D. (2025). Restorative Justice As A Boundary Object. Reconceptualizing Critical Victimology, 55(3), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978726031.ch-007
Murray, J. E. (1965). Introduction to the Morality of Law. VillaNova Law Review, 10(4). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol10/iss4/2
Nainggolan, M. (2025). Transformasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam KUHP Baru. Retrieved from Dandapala website: https://dandapala.com/opini/detail/transformasi-penegakan-hukum-pidana-dalam-kuhp-baru
Nurhaniffa, A., & Haryana, W. (2022). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal Dalam Mempertahankan Budaya Kampung Adat Cireundeu Di Era Modernisasi. Cendekia, 16(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.30957/cendekia.v16i1.714.mereka
Nurwahyuni, N., Sumartini, S., & Kholik, S. (2022). Kedudukan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Modern. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 4(1), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v4n1.p224-242
The Government of the Republic of Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP. , (2023).
Wahyudhi, D., Herlambang, H., & Sudarti, E. (2026). Integrasi Hukum Adat dalam Kerangka KUHP Baru: Evaluasi Pluralisme Hukum dan Tantangan Implementasi Restoratif Justice. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 3(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v3i2.5186
Wibowo, S., Dimyati, K., Absori, Wardiono, K., Ramon, T. M., & Budiono, A. (2023). Islamic Nomocracy: from the Perspectives of Indonesia, Spain and Russia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.25358
Yonatan Iskandar Chandra. (2024). Metamorfosis Hakikat Hukum Pidana Adat dalam KUHP Nasional. Retrieved from Hukum Online website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/metamorfosis-hakikat-hukum-pidana-adat-dalam-kuhp-nasional-lt6759cfa8a3e92/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Faisal, Robert Lengkong Weku, Nurlaila Kadarwati Papuluwa, Isyana Kurniasari Koronas, Arief Budiono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
























