Legal Certainty of Personal Data Protection in Indonesia: A Legal Analysis of the Implementation of Law No. 27 of 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3746Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Personal Data, Juridical Analysis, PDP Law, Supervisory InstitutionsAbstract
The development of information technology has triggered an increase in incidents of digital data exploitation, prompting the birth of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (UU PDP) as the main legal instrument (lex specialis). This research aims to analyze the legal certainty of personal data protection after the full enactment of the PDP Law and identify juridical obstacles in its implementation in Indonesia. The research method used is normative law (doctrine) with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The research results show that the PDP Law has provided a strong normative framework by emphasizing the rights of data subjects, the obligations of data controllers, as well as strict administrative and criminal sanctions. However, the principle of legal certainty is still hampered by the lack of formalization of the independent PDP Authority Supervisory Institution in accordance with the mandate of Article 58, as well as the incomplete completion of several crucial derivative regulations. This condition triggers temporary dualism of supervision and hampers the optimization of corporate sanctions enforcement. This research concludes that accelerating the formation of the Presidential Regulation on PDP Bodies and strengthening the competence of Data Protection Officers (DPO) in each sector is an absolute prerequisite for realizing just legal certainty in Indonesia’s digital space.
References
Admiral, A., & Pauck, M. A. (2023). Unveiling the Dark Side of Fintech: Challenges and Breaches in Protecting User Data in Indonesia’s Online Loan Service. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(2), 995-1048. 10.3280/RISS2024-002017
Devi, P. F. S., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2026). Legal Protection of Children's Privacy Rights from Global EdTech Governance Oversight. proceedings. icesy, 1(01).
Gawas, V. M. (2017). Doctrinal legal research method a guiding principle in reforming the law and legal system towards the research development. International Journal of Law, 3(5), 128-130.
Gellert, R., & Gutwirth, S. (2013). The legal construction of privacy and data protection. Computer Law & Security Review, 29(5), 522-530.
Itasari, E. R., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2021). Legal Protection Againts Violations of Human Rights That Abuse Uighur Ethnic Women in China. Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender Dan Anak, 33-48.
Majeed, N., Hilal, A., & Khan, A. N. (2023). Doctrinal research in law: Meaning, scope and methodology. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), 559-563. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00167
Mangku, D. G. S., Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Hadi, N. G. A. H. (2022, September). Digital contact tracking as a prevention of Covid-19 and the problem of data privacy protection. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2573, No. 1, p. 020011). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0104104
Maulana, M. I. A., Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2026). Evaluasi Implementasi Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi pada Kasus Kebocoran Data Pengguna E-Commerce di Indonesia:(Studi Kasus Perlindungan Data Pribadi). Hukum Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(2), 41-51.
Miller, L., Miller, R., & Dismukes, J. (2006). The critical role of information and information technology in future accelerated radical innovation. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 5(2), 63-99.
Putri, H. A. (2025). Legal Review of the use of Personal Data in the Development of Artificial Intelligence Under the Personal Data Protection Law. Jentera: Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 1-15.
Rohman, M. M., Mu’minin, N., Masuwd, M., & Elihami, E. (2024). Methodological reasoning finds law using normative studies (theory, approach and analysis of legal materials). MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 204-221.
Yuliartini, N. P. R., Mangku, D. G. S., & Sariasa, G. (2026). From algorithms to crime: A criminal law analysis of the use of bots to manipulate public opinion. BIS Humanities and Social Science, 4, V426006-V426006. 4, https://doi.org/10.31603/bishss.433
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Putu Balarama Mahesa Putra, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
























