Enforceability of Arbitration Awards and Jurisdictional Uncertainty: A Study of Kompetenz-Kompetenz and Party Autonomy in PCA Case No. 2015-40

Authors

  • Sharon Marilyn Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Gatot P. Soemartono Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.432

Keywords:

Arbitration, jurisdiction, awards enforceability

Abstract

Ideally, arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution that frequently applies in subjects of international commerce. In fact, it is the determination of an issue without resorting to the court. The very first issue of concern that needs to be established in adjudicating any matter of arbitration is jurisdiction. Without doing so, no question of a substantive issue of a case can be addressed. In this case, several issues regarding jurisdiction came into question in the PCA case No. 2015-40 involving IMFA and The Republic of Indonesia. Thus, while the jurisdictional objections filed by the respondent were unanswered, the tribunal advanced and addressed the merits of the case. It was after filing its reply; therefore, this paper shall research the effect of such jurisdictional ambiguities on the enforceability of an award.
The method in this paper is qualitative, based on existing literature, the principles of party autonomy, and kompetenz-kompetenz. The contention is that although technically possible to retain jurisdiction, it is not advisable to overlook such jurisdictional objections simply because the outcome is ambiguous and one sets a bad precedent.

References

Bayer, ______________________, Ag, C., Bayer, C., Nv, Hagglund, R., Koch, R., … Washington, D. (2016). United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Retrieved from https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/16-1530.opinion.2-27-2017.1.pdf

Benedettelli, M. V. (2013). To Bifurcate or Not To Bifurcate? That is the (Ambiguous) Question. Arbitration International, 29(3), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/29.3.493

Blackaby, N., Constantine Partasides, Redfern, A., & Hunter, M. (2009). Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford University Press, USA.

Budi Juliardi, S.H., M.Pd, Runtunuwu, B., Hendy, M., Andi Darmawansya TL., M.H, Arini, Raju, … S.H, S. (2023). METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM. CV. Gita Lentera.

Chatterjee, C. (2003). The Reality of The Party Autonomy Rule In International Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 20(Issue 6), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2003046

Gaillard, E. (2015). Sociology of international arbitration. Arbitration International, 31(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiv021

Garg, R. (2022, December 5). Jurisdiction of arbitration tribunal. Retrieved May 14, 2024, from IPleaders website: https://blog.ipleaders.in/jurisdiction-of-arbitration-tribunal/

Hanotiau, B. (2018, October 30). Making Arbitration Fit for the Future. Hong Kong Arbitration Week 2018.

JUDGMENT Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company (Appellant) v The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan (Respondent). (2010). Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0165-judgment.pdf

Kabir, S. (2016). (PDF) Methods of Data Collection. Retrieved from ResearchGate website: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325528948_Methods_of_Data_Collection

Kamanga, P. N. S. (2021). "The Power of an Arbitral Tribunal to Determine Its Own Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration." (“Separability in International Commercial Arbitration; Confluence ...”) Beijing Law Review, 12(02), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2021.122021

Kirby, J. (2015). Efficiency in International Arbitration: Whose Duty Is It? Journal of International Arbitration, 32(Issue 6), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2015032

Lenny, A. (2015, September). Search the Arbitration Law Database | ArbitrationLaw.com. Retrieved May 8, 2024, from arbitrationlaw.com website: https://arbitrationlaw.com/library/kompetenz-

Liang, J. (2018). Party Autonomy in Contractual Choice of Law in China. Cambridge University Press.

Loukas Mistelis. (2020). Efficiency—What Else? Oxford University Press EBooks, 349–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0014

Mills, A. (2020). Arbitral Jurisdiction. Oxford University Press EBooks, 70–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0003

Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Pt Remaja Rosdakarya.

NICArb. (2022, February 23). Understanding the Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle. Retrieved from NICArb website: https://blog.nicarb.org/index.php/2022/02/23/understanding-the-kompetenz-kompetenz-principle/

Nweke-Eze, S. U. (2023, December 21). Jurisdiction: Main Elements. Retrieved May 14, 2024, from globalarbitrationreview.com website: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-investment-treaty-protection-and-enforcement/second-edition/article/jurisdiction-main-elements

Schultz, T., Ortino, F., & Mitchenson, J. (2020). The Oxford handbook of international arbitration. Oxford ; New York, Ny: Oxford University Press.

Stern, T., & Robinson, J. (2004). WHEN AND HOW TO USE SECONDARY SOURCES AND PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY TO RESEARCH AND WRITE LEGAL DOCUMENTS *. Retrieved from https://www.law.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/secondarysources.pdf

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (1985). UNCITRAL model law on international commercial arbitration. United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-19

How to Cite

Marilyn, S., & P. Soemartono, G. (2024). Enforceability of Arbitration Awards and Jurisdictional Uncertainty: A Study of Kompetenz-Kompetenz and Party Autonomy in PCA Case No. 2015-40. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(4), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.432