Debtor's Legal Consequences of Approval of Motor Over Credit Without the Leasing Party's Knowledge

Authors

  • Hilman Alfiansah Faculty of Law, Buana Perjuangan University Karawang, Indonesia
  • Yuniar Rahmatiar Faculty of Law, Buana Perjuangan University Karawang, Indonesia
  • Suyono Sanjaya Faculty of Law, Buana Perjuangan University Karawang, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Abas Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.449

Keywords:

Leasing Company, Default, Fiduciary Guarantee

Abstract

The Over credit process is a method of purchasing an asset by transferring credit from the initial debtor to the new debtor. In the motorbike overcredit scheme, the first party who transfers their motorbike credit to the second party will receive compensation in the form of cash as a substitute for the down payment or what is usually called Down Payment. Meanwhile, the second party will continue the remaining installments from the previous installments. Transfer of fiduciary guarantees or over credit transfer is the process of transferring ownership of an object along with installment payments that are still on credit to an individual who is a third party. The fiduciary guarantee itself is a security right for an object in the credit process that remains in the control of the debtor. The development of leasing companies is quite rapid in Indonesia, the types of goods financed are increasingly varied, not only in the field of transportation but also expanding to the industrial, telecommunications, agricultural and other sectors. Financing carried out by the leasing party is stated in the credit agreement between the leasing party and the debtor.

References

Achmad Yusuf Sutarjo, Djuwityastuti, 2018, “Akibat Hukum Debitor Wanprestasi Pada Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen Dengan Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Disita Pihak Ketiga” (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3089 K/Pdt/2015) , Privat Law Vol.6, No. 1

Hartanto, Cut Wilda Meutia Syafiina, 2021 “Efektivitas Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Produk Kosmetik Yang Tidak Memiliki Izin Edar Balai Besar Pengawas Obat Dan Makanan Diy (Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana)”, Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Vol 4, No 1 Kadek Cinthya Dwi Lestari*, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha dan Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti, 2020, “Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan”, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2 (3)

Munir Fuady “hukum jaminan hutang” Jakarta 2013 hlm 30

Hamzah Dan Sendung Manulang, Hukum jaminan , Rineka cipta Jakarta hlm 167

R. Wiryono Projodikoro, Asas Perjanjian Hukum , Bandung: Sumur 1933 hlm 9

Warman Johan, Kredit Bank, Jakarta 2018 hlm 152

Qirom Syamsudin, pokok hukum Perjanjian beserta pengembangannya, Yogyakarta 2006 hlm9

Sutarno, Aspek-Axpek Hukum Perkreditan Puda Bank, (Jakarta: Alfabeta, 2003), hlm. 118

Mahkamah Agung RI, Masalah Leasing. Bagian Penerbitan Mahkamah Agung, Jakarta, 1989 hlm.6

Pasal 1365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Hilman Alfiansah, Rahmatiar , Y., Sanjaya , S., & Abas, M. . (2024). Debtor’s Legal Consequences of Approval of Motor Over Credit Without the Leasing Party’s Knowledge. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(4), 1052–1057. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.449

Most read articles by the same author(s)