Problems of Determining Suspect Against a Deceased Person In The Investigation Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.464Keywords:
Died; Determination; Investigation; SuspectAbstract
Bringing judicial proceedings against the body or memory of a deceased defendant was once possible, but this is no longer possible in today’s world, as criminal actions must be stopped even before a deceased complainant is named as a suspect. This research aims to examine the criminal justice system in Indonesia regulating the status of cases against the determination of a suspect in a person as a witness/reported person who has first died. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. According to the findings of the study, the current Criminal Procedure Code cannot provide an adequate answer regarding the validity of the determination of a suspect against a deceased person, because it only states that the investigation must be stopped if the suspect dies, which implies that the suspect should have been determined during the investigation process. Therefore, lawmakers should make rules regarding the mechanism for investigations when the reported or suspected guilty person dies. Because in fact, the death of a person as a reported person suspected of committing a criminal offense requires the termination of the criminal case because the legal subject who should be held accountable for the criminal offense has died.
References
Aditya Bakti.
Al-Fadel, M. (1976). The Brief in the Principles of Criminal Proceedings (4th ed., Vol. 1). Damascus: University of Damascus.
Alfitra. (2014). Hapusnya Hak &Menuntut Menjalankan Pidana. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses.
Ali, M. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Alin, F. (2017). Sistem Pidana Dan Pemidanaan di Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 3(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.33760/JCH.V3I1.6
Al-Kahwaji, A. (2002). Explanation of Criminal Procedure law (Vol. 1). Beirut: Al Halabi legal Publications.
Arief, B. N. (1998). Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Asmarawati, T. (2014). Pidana dan Pemidanaan dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia (Hukum Penitensier). Sleman: Deepublish.
Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana Pernada Media Group.
Awaeh, S. H. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Atas Tindak Pidana Judi Online Ditinjau Dari Prespektif Hukum Pidana. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 5(5), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v5i5.17708
Barlyan, N. K. (2020). Penetapan Tersangka & Praperadilan. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Cahyadi, A., & Manulang, E. F. M. (2007). Pengantar ke Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Candra, S. (2013). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana; Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional yang Akan Datang. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i1.2979
Efendi, E. (2011). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Fadlian, A. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Suatu Kerangka Teoritis. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 5(2), 10–19.
H. L. A, H. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamzah, A. (2010). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hamzah, C. M. (2014). Penjelasan Hukum (Restatement) tentang Bukti Permulaan Yang Cukup. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia (PSHK).
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2009). Asas Legalitas dan Penemuan Hukum dalam Hukum Pidana (W. Hardani, Ed.). Penerbit Erlangga.
Hosni, M. N. (1995). Explanation of the Criminal Procedure law (3rd ed.). Cairo: Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya.
Issa, H. M. A., & Al-Khseilat, A. (2019). The Impact of Death of the Accused on the Criminal Action in the Jordanian Law. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(5), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhss.v9n5p17
Lapasi, D. (2016). Penetapan Tersangka Berdasarkan Bukti Permulaan yang Cukup. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v4i2.11199
Lefort, J. (1877). Cours élémentaire de droit criminal. Paris: Ernest Thorin.
Lengkong, R. A. (2021). Penetapan Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Penyidik Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. LEX PRIVATUM, 9(8). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/35180
Lubis, F. (2020). Bunga Rampai Hukum Acara Pidana. Medan: CV. Manhaji.
Marpaung, L. (2008). Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Penyelidikan & Penyidikan). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Munib, M. A. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. JUSTITIABLE: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 60–73.
Noviansah, W. (2023). Penyidik di Kasus Mahasiswa UI Tewas Kecelakaan Jadi Tersangka Disidang Etik. Retrieved June 1, 2023, from DetikNews website: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6558639/penyidik-di-kasus-mahasiswa-ui-tewas-kecelakaan-jadi-tersangka-disidang-etik
Nur Cahya Dian Saputra & Syamsul Bahri. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Atas Gugurnya Hak Untuk Menuntut Pidana Menurut Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal LEGALITAS, 5(1).
Polishchuk, O. (2014). Dispositive Regime in Criminal Law Regulation. Law Herald, (6), 30–30.
Prodjo, W. A. (2021). Kronologi Tewasnya 6 Laskar FPI Versi Jaksa. Retrieved May 24, 2023, from KOMPAS.com website: https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2021/10/18/16405641/kronologi-tewasnya-6-laskar-fpi-versi-jaksa
Puspitasari, N. R. (2017). Penerapan Pasal 77 KUHP Tentang Gugurnya Hak Melakukan Penuntutan dalam Proses Persidangan (Kajian Yuridias Atas Produk Hukum yang Dikeluarkan Hakim Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Purbalingga). Jurnal Idea Hukum, 3(1), 507–519.
Raseuki, G., & Rizanizarli, R. (2018). Kewenangan Penyidik Menerbitkan Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan Terhadap Tersangka Yang Mengalami Gangguan Kejiwaan (Suatu Penelitian di Kepolisian Resor Kota Banda Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 2(4), 709–719.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rusianto, A. (2015). Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Surabaya: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Salem, N. M. (2009). Explanation of the Criminal Procedure law (Vol. 1). Cairo: Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya.
Sapardjaja, K. E. (2016). Perkembangan Asas Legalitas. In Demi Keadilan: Antologi Hukum Pidana dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Enam Dasawarsa Harkristuti Harkrisnowo (pp. 32–45). Jakarta: Pustaka Kemang.
Simovi?, M. M., & Karovi?, S. N. (2020). Universal Warranties of the Suspect or the Accused in Criminal Proceedings in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Effects of Physical Activity on Anthropological Status in Security Agency Per. Presented at the Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance, Arcibald Reiss Days, Serbia. Serbia: University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies.
Sofyan, A. M. (2020). Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Sugianto, H. (2018). Hukum Acara Pidana dalam praktek pradilan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Sutrisna, T. (2023). Mahasiswa UI Tewas dalam Kecelakaan Jadi Tersangka, Polisi: Kalau Tak Puas, Ajukan Praperadilan. Retrieved June 1, 2023, from Kompas.com website: https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2023/01/27/12475551/mahasiswa-ui-tewas-dalam-kecelakaan-jadi-tersangka-polisi-kalau-tak-puas
Syamsu, M. A. (2016). Penjatuhan Pidana dan Dua Prinsip Dasar Hukum Pidana (1st ed.). Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.
Tomalili, R. (2019). Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Ubaedillah, A., & Rozak, A. (2015). Demokrasi, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Masyarakat Madani. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Werluka, L. (2019). Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Pembuktian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. JURNAL BELO, 4(2), 228–248. https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol4issue2page228-248
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Jamaludin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
