Analysis of Considerations of Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances in Corruption Crime Cases (Case Study Decision Number 942 K/Pid.Sus/2022)

Authors

  • Ferdinan Januari Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Bambang Waluyo Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.505

Keywords:

Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances, Justice, Punishment

Abstract

This article is entitled Analysis of Considerations of Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances in Corruption Crime Cases (Case Study of Decision Number 942 K/Pid.Sus/2022).  This article aims to analyze the application of mitigating and aggravating circumstances in corruption cases as well as finding the influence of these on Decision Number 942K/Pid.Sus/2022.  Using normative juridical methods with a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach.  The results of this study show that there are problems regarding the application of mitigating and aggravating circumstances due to differences in the interpretations and views of each judge.  Apart from that, the influence shown by the incompatibility of the application of mitigating and aggravating circumstances can have an impact on not achieving the objectives of the sentence, including retaliation and a deterrent effect on the defendant as found in the corruption case Decision Number 942K/Pid.Sus/2022.

References

Conference of the States Parties to the Convention against Corruption, Report of the special session of the Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption Conference of the States Parties to the Convention against Corruption, Report of the special session of the Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption, https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/COSP/conference-of-the-states-parties.html, diakes pada tanggal 20 Maret 2024 pukul 13.00 WIB

Golonggom, Mohamad Nurfaizi. "Penegakan tindak pidana suap menurut ketentuan hukum pidana nasional." Lex Crimen 10, 5 (2021): 120-130.

Gorbunova, Larisa V., Ruslan V. Makarov, and Sergei A. Matveev. "Aggravating Circumstances, Significance and Correlation with Qualifying Signs." dalam Mediterranean Journal of Social Science 6, no. 3 S 7 (2015). 169-178

Hananta, Dwi. "Pertimbangan keadaan-keadaan meringankan dan memberatkan dalam penjatuhan pidana/aggravating and mitigating circumstances consideration on sentencing." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 7, 1 (2018): 87-108.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan Sidang, Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Edisi Kedua, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005)

Hotasi, Matthew Eliezer. "Analisis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Benih Bening Lobster oleh Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 942 K/Pid. Sus/2022)." (2023).

Huda, Chairul. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan (Jakarta: Kencana, 2015), 150-151.

Indah, Christina Maya. "Menggagas Cita Moral Dalam Penafsiran Hukum Hakim." Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, 1 (2019): 41-60.

Khalid, Afif. "Penafsiran hukum oleh hakim dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia." Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum 6, 11 (2014): 9-36.

Maftukhan, Ahmad Habibi, Anjar Setiawan, and Muhamad Abdul Aziz. "Keadilan, Kemanfaatan Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Putusan Batal Demi Hukum Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." Verstek 2, 2 (2014): 122-131.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2010)

Oetari, Adinda Anisa Putri Noor, and Ade Mahmud. "Kebebasan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bantuan Sosial Covid-19 Dikaitkan dengan Asas Keadilan dan Dasar Pemberatan Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan." Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 1, 2 (2021): 96-103.

Peona?u, Cosmin. "Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances. Their Impact on Judicial Individualization of Punishment." Journal of Danubian Studies and Research 5, 1 (2015): 147-159.

Safitri, Azzahra Dhea, and Supardi Supardi. "Hinaan Publik Sebagai Alasan Meringankan Pidana dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid. Sus TPK/2021/PN. Jkt. Pst)." National Conference on Law Studies (NCOLS) 5, 1 (2023): 520-534.

Transparency International, Corupption Preception Index 2023 https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023, diakses pada tanggal 20 maret 2024 pukul 16.25 WIB

Waluyo, Bambang. Pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi: Strategi dan optimalisasi (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022)

Wibowo, Ari, and Ivan Agung Widiyasmoko. "Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Pidana di Bawah Minimum Khusus: Studi Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika." Undang: Jurnal Hukum 4, 2 (2021): 345-369.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-03

How to Cite

Ferdinan Januari, & Bambang Waluyo. (2024). Analysis of Considerations of Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances in Corruption Crime Cases (Case Study Decision Number 942 K/Pid.Sus/2022). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(5), 1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.505