A Philosophical Study of The Existence of A Restorative Justice House As A Forum For Resolving Minor Criminal Cases In The Jurisdiction of The Palangka Raya District Attorney's Office
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.533Keywords:
Alternative Resolution, Minor Criminal Cases, Palangka Raya District Attorney's Office, Philosophical Study, Restorative Justice HouseAbstract
This study analyzes the existence of Restorative Justice House (Rumah Restoratif Justice) as a mechanism for resolving minor criminal cases in the jurisdiction of the Palangka Raya District Attorney's Office. The background of the problem shows an increase in the number of minor criminal cases resulting in excessive court workload and ineffective handling of conflicts in the society. In this context, Restorative Justice House emerges as an alternative solution that emphasizes restorative justice, where the main focus is the restoration of relationships between perpetrators, victims and the community. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the philosophical and practical role of Restorative Justice House in supporting the criminal justice system in Palangka Raya. This research seeks to answer the questions: What is the philosophical basis or main principle of the restorative justice house concept established by the Palangka Raya District Attorney's Office? What is the urgency of the existence of restorative justice houses in handling minor criminal cases in the jurisdiction of the Palangka Raya District Attorney's Office? The research method used was a qualitative approach with literature analysis and in-depth interviews with legal practitioners and communities involved in Restorative Justice House. The results of this study indicate that Restorative Justice House provides a practical solution to reduce the burden on the courts and strengthens the principles of restorative justice that are more inclusive and adaptive to local needs. The philosophical implications of Restorative Justice House underscore the importance of a restorative and rehabilitation-oriented approach, as opposed to a traditional retributive approach.
References
Albert Aries, 2006, Penyelesaian Perkara Pencurian Ringan dan Keadilan Restoratif, Ikatan Hakim Indonesia: Majalah Varia Peradilan, Tahun XX. No. 247.
Eva Achjani Zulfa, 2009, Keadilan Restoratif, Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Eriyantouw Wahid, 2009, Keadilan Restoratif dan Peradilan Konvensional dalam Hukum Pidana, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta.
G. Widiartana, 2014, Viktimologi: Perspektif Korban dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Jakarta.
H. Siswanto Sunarso, 2014, Viktimologi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Kent Roach, 2000, Changing Punishmen at the Turn of the Century: Restorative Justice on the Rise, Canadian Jurnal of Criminology, Number 7.
Mengenal Rumah Restorative Justice, https://nasional.tempo.co, diakses tanggal 23 April 2024.
Prija Djatmika, 2008, Penyelesaian Perkara Penghinaan dengan Sarana Pers, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Romli Atmasasmita, 2010, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Kencana Prenada Media Grup, Jakarta.
Rofiq Hidayat, Menilik 3 Peraturan Kejaksaan dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice, https://www.hukumonline.com, diakses tanggal 23 April 2024.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2003, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Cet. Ketujuh, Ed. Pertama, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.
Pedoman Kejaksaan (Perja) Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 tentang Akses Keadilan bagi Perempuan dan Anak dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana.
Pedoman Kejaksaan (Perja) Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelesaian Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Melalui Rehabilitasi Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Pelaksanaan Asas Dominus Litis Jaksa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kiki Kristanto, Fransisco Fransisco, Tomy Alfarizy, Fandra Saputra, Mira Mawarni
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).