Critical Review of Officials Making Land Deeds Who Do Not Comply With The Procedure For Making Authentic Deeds of Land Sale and Purchase Agreements

Authors

  • Riska Junita Faculty Master of Notary, University of Pasundan, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Eber Rosadiana University of Pasundan, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Denti Dwi Ayu Agustini University of Pasundan, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Aslan Noor University of Pasundan, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.696

Keywords:

Land Sale and Purchase Agreement, PPAT, Authentic Deed

Abstract

The responsibilities of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) include administrative and legal responsibilities. Procedures that are not in accordance with the regulations for making authentic deeds of land sale and purchase agreements will have an impact on the strength of the deed of agreement and even on the Land Deed Making Official himself in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 2016 concerning the Position of Land Deed Making Officials and regulations regarding the Code of Ethics for the Association of Deed Making Officials. Land. The implication of errors in the procedure for making the deed is that the PPAT was dishonorably dismissed from his position, and weakened the strength of the authentic deed of sale and purchase to become a private agreement. Factors that influence PPAT in violating the regulations for making authentic deeds, there are actions that PPAT must take in order to save the sale and purchase transaction, There is mutual trust between the parties including PPAT officials, Time factors and strong relationships cause PPAT to make authentic deeds that are not in accordance with procedures and procedures for making deeds in accordance with applicable regulations.

References

Bakri, Muhammad. 2011. Hak Menguasai Tanah oleh Negara (Paradigma Baru untuk Reforma Agraria). Malang: UB Press.

Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003).

Djulaeka. Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum (Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka, 2019).

Effendi Perangin, Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Suatu Telaah Dari Sudut Pandang Praktisi Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1994

Handri Rahardjo, Hukum Perjanjian di Indonesia, Pustaka Yustisia, Jakarta, 2009.

Herlien Budiono. Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian Dan Penerapannya Di Bidangkenotariatan, Cetakan Keempat, Citra Aditya Bakti.Bandung. 2014.

Herlin Bodiono, 2004, Artikel “Pengikatan Jual Beli Dalam Kuasa Mutlak”, Majalah Renvoi,Edisi Tahun 1, No 10,

J. Kartini Soedjendro, Perjanjian Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah yang Berpotensi Konflik, Yogyakarta, Kansisius, 2001.

J. Moleong, 2002, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif,,Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1988 ,“Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri”. Ghalia Indonesia.

Salim, Peraturan Jabatan dan Kode Etik Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT), Cet. Ke I, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok, 2019

Siahan, M.P. Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan Teori dan Praktek, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003)

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mahmudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003)

Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian, Intermasa, Jakarta, 1987

Widjawan, Dhanang. implikasi hukum pembuatan akta jual beli tanah yang Tidak sesuai dengan tata cara pembuatan akta PPAT” Case Law Jurnal of law, Vol 2 , 2021.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-14

How to Cite

Junita, R., Rosadiana, E., Agustini, D. D. A., & Noor, A. (2024). Critical Review of Officials Making Land Deeds Who Do Not Comply With The Procedure For Making Authentic Deeds of Land Sale and Purchase Agreements. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(5), 1794–1800. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.696