The Responsibility of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property in Resolving the Trademark Dispute Over 'Tempo Gelato'

Authors

  • Belliana Herlina Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Christine Kansil Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.895

Keywords:

The Effectiveness of Legislation, Trademark Dispute Resolution, The Responsibilities of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property

Abstract

The Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications aims to provide clear legal protection for legitimate trademark owners. A legitimate trademark owner is the person who first registers their trademark or service mark. In practice, conflicts often arise due to unilateral trademark registrations. This study focuses on the trademark dispute case of Tempo Gelato, where one party in a business partnership registered the trademark without the consent of the original owner. The Directorate General of Intellectual Property Ministry of Law and Human Rights Republic of Indonesia plays a crucial role in preventing unilateral registrations and ensuring that dispute resolution processes adhere to legal provisions. This study also examines the responsibilities of government agencies in cases of unilateral registration, including the dispute resolution mechanisms offered in the law and their vital role in safeguarding the exclusive rights of trademark owners to prevent abuse of the registration system.

References

Akbar, S. A., Adnan, A. M. R., & Azmi, F. A. N. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital. Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(4).

Ardianto, C. J. (2024). Peran Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DJKI) Dalam Menerima Permohonan Merek Dari Pemilik Merek Terkenal. Universitas Lampung Bandar Lampung.

Denny, D., Liegestu, Y. P., Novika, N., & Patros, A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Di Indonesia: Studi Putusan. Sapientia Et Virtus, 7(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i2.377

Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia. (2019). Modul Kekayaan Intelektual Bidang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia.

Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia. (2024). Struktur Organisasi Direktorat Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM Republik Indonesia. https://www.dgip.go.id/tentang-djki/struktur-organisasi/direktorat-merek-dan-indikasi-geografis#:~:text=Direktorat Merek dan Indikasi Geografis mempunyai tugas melaksanakan penyiapan perumusan,pelayanan teknis%2C pemeriksaan%2C sertifikasi%2C

Ferdian, M. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis Terhadap Persaingan Usaha Tidak Jujur. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara–Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma, 9(2), 74–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i2.355

Konsultan HKI. (2021). Mengajukan Sanggahan Terhadap Keberatan Pendaftaran Suatu Merek. Konsultanhki.Com. https://www.konsultanki.com/2021/07/menjawab-sanggahan-terhadap-keberatan.html

Kusumah, J. (2022). Jika Ada Sengketa, Ini Tanggung Jawab DJKI Atas Merek Terdaftar. Hukumonline.Com.

Marta, M. F. (2023). Tinjauan Pustaka (Merek). Pengadilan Agama Selatpanjang. https://www.pa-selatpanjang.go.id/id/artikel-pa-slp/1925-tinjauan-pustaka-merek.html

Matheus, J. (2021). E-Arbitration: Digitization Of Business Dispute Resolution Pada Sektor E-Commerce Dalam Menyongsong Era Industri 4.0 Di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Lex Renaissance, 6(4), 692–704.

Nurahmasari, R., Amirulloh, M., & Afriana, A. (2021). Mediasi Sebagai Kewajiban Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Pelanggaran Paten di Indonesia Demi Kepastian dan Kemanfaatan Hukum. ACTA DIURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i1.712

Ramania, H., Lie, G., & Aprilia, I. S. (2024). Tantangan Hukum Dalam Mengamankan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital Dalam Analisis Kasus Tempo Gelato. JALAKOTEK: Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology, 1(2), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.57235/jalakotek.v1i2.2387

Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2022). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Suatu Pengantar. Widina Bhakti Persada.

Sunarto, A., Adnan, M. A., Karo, C. K., & Khair, A. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Dagang Tempo Gelato. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 4(3), 389–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.4.3.7543.389-395

Downloads

Published

2024-11-11

How to Cite

Belliana Herlina, & Christine Kansil. (2024). The Responsibility of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property in Resolving the Trademark Dispute Over ’Tempo Gelato’. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.895

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Belliana Herlina, Christine Kansil

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).