Legal Responsibility of the Regional Supervisory Council of Notaries for Sanctioning a Written Reprimand to a Notary Contrary to the Norms of Article 53 Paragraph (2) of the Law on State Administrative Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.1036Keywords:
Legal Responsibility, Notary Regional Supervisory Council, Sanction of Written Reprimand, Notary, Article 53 paragraph (2) of the PTUN LawAbstract
This research aims to determine the legal responsibility of the notary regional supervisory board which has given a written warning sanction to the notary which is contrary to the norms of Article 53 paragraph (2) of the PTUN Law and to find out the legal remedies that the notary can take against the decision of the notary regional supervisory board which has been stated wrong by the PTUN according to Notarial Legal Perception. The research method used is normative juridical legal research. The results of the research show that the legal responsibility of the Notary MPW in giving written warning sanctions to notaries must be carried out carefully and under provisions aimed at maintaining the integrity of the notary profession, protecting the rights of notaries, and ensuring that the supervision process is carried out objectively and transparent. Notaries disadvantaged by MPW decisions declared wrong by the PTUN have several legal routes that can be taken to defend their rights. This step includes filing an appeal, a civil lawsuit, and efforts to rehabilitate the good name. Notaries need to follow proper legal procedures and obtain adequate legal advice to optimize the chances of success in their legal efforts. This legal route reflects justice and protection of notary rights in the notarial legal system in Indonesia
References
Chalim, N. A. (2017). Kedudukan dan Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Otentik. Jurnal Akta, 4 No. 4 Desember , 658.
Hadjon, P. W. (1998). Tentang Wewenang Pemerintahan (Bestuursbevoegdheid). Pro Justicia, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Parahyangan Bandung, XVI, No. 1, 2.
I Wayan Parsa, K. S. (2016). Implikasi Yuridis Legalitas Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Dalam Pembinaan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik. Acta Comita Journal Hukum Kenotariatan, 1 No. 2, Agustus, 131-293.
Kohar, A. (2005). Notaris DAlam Praktek Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.
Madyastuti, R. (2020). Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Dalam Pencegahan Terjadinya Pelanggaran Kewenangan dan Tugas Jabatan Notaris. Lex Renaissance, 5 No. 3 Juli .
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Purwani, D. P. (2016). Pengawasan Notaris oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris Daerah Pasca Putusan MK No. 49/PUU-X/2012. Udaya Master Law Journal, 5 No. 5, 786.
Safa'at, J. A. (2012). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Konstitusi Pers.
Tobing, G. L. (2003). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eka Aprilia, Rasji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
